Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p a chaudhary · Page 1 of about 217 results (0.184 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 06 2011

Badar Durrez Ahmed and anr. Vs. State(Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-06-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 201, 120-B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173, 313

Advocate for Appellant : Mr S.P.Singh Chaudhary; Mr Y.R. Sharma, Advs.

1. These two appeals are filed against the common judgment dated 28th January, 2009 passed in Sessions case no.37/08 by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi arising out of FIR No.51/2002 registered at Police Station...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2010

Bhagat Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 304, 307, 308, 395, 411, 427, 435, 436 and 452; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173, 173(2), 173(8) and 313

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Singh Chaudhari,; Y.R. Sharma and; Shailendra Kumar

Ajit Bharihoke, J.1. Above referred appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 22nd August 2009 in Sessions Case No. 7/2000, FIR No. 489/1984 Police Station Sarai Rohilla convicting the appellants Mangal Sain @ Billa, Bhagat...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2005

Sawinder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-09-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2006CriLJ761

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Chaudhary, Amicus Curiae

Pritam Pal, J.1. Appellants --Sawinder Singh (70 years) and his wife, Smt. Rachna (70 years), have filed this appeal against judgment and order dated 6-2-1997 whereby they were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 28 1998

Rameshwar Vs. Vth Additional District Judge, Basti and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-28-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rules 3 and 4 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2025

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Chaudhary, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. An application for substitution was filed in Suit No. 357 of 1982. By an order dated 8.1.1998 the learned trial court recorded an order that in view of stay of further proceeding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2002

Steel Tubes of India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-13-2002

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003]131STC425(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Chaudhari, Adv.

1. Heard Shri P.M. Chaudhari, learned counsel for the appellant on the question of admission.2. This order shall also govern disposal of L.P. As. Nos. 27 of 2002 (Steel Tubes India v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2004

Jagdish Chand Vs. Surinder Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-18-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2)

Reported in : (2005)139PLR509

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Chaudhary, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition filed by the landlord under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrict Act, 1949 (for brevity, 'the Act') challenges concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2007

Keshav Tyagi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 392, 411 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Punjab Police Rules - Rule 26.20

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3633; 140(2007)DLT672

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Singh Chaudhary, Adv. in Criminal Appeal No. 665 of 1999 and; V.K. Raina, Adv. in Criminal Appeal

P.K. Bhasin, J.1. These two appeals have been filed by the two appellants challenging their conviction under Sections 120-B IPC, 452/120-B, 392/120-B and 302/120-B IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi vide his judgment dated 07-09-1999...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2000

Shiv Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-28-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Third Amendment) Ordinance, 1999 - Sections 19; Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 169, 173, 207, 208, 227, 228, 239, 240, 245, 397 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, 243-F and 329

Reported in : 2000(3)WLN563

Advocate for Appellant : Mahesh Bora,; P.P. Chaudhary,; Rajesh Joshi,;

ORDERMathur, J.(1). By this group of writ petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Sec. 19 (g), 19 (gg) and Proviso (ii) of Section 19 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2011

Kalloo and Others Vs. Satti Din

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-29-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Chaudhary, Adv

1. Present contempt petition has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt Court Act for the alleged non-compliance of the order dated 03.09.2002 passed in Second Appeal No. 5 of 1995 (Satti Din v. Kallo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1996

Union of India and Others Vs. Garware Nylons Ltd. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-09-1996

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Schedule 1

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)125; AIR1996SC3509; 2003(86)ECC404; 1996(87)ELT12(SC); 1996(6)SCALE667; (1996)10SCC413; [1996]Supp5SCR629

Advocate for Appellant : P.A. Chaudhary,; A. Subba Rao,; V. K. Verma,;

ORDERK.S. Paripoornan, J.1. Special leave granted in S.L.P. (C) No. 11008 of 1988.2. The above three appeals involve a common question of law, namely, whether 'Nylon Twine' can be considered as 'Nylon Yarn' so as to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial