Advanced Search Results
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Ved Wati and ors.
Delhi
Sep-13-1993
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A
II(1993)ACC577; 1993ACJ1249; 1993IIIAD(Delhi)817; 52(1993)DLT1; 1993(27)DRJ279
J.N. Aggarwal and; O.P. Goyal, Advs
V.B. Bansal, J. (1) By this judgment, I will dispose of F.A.O. 1 10/83, Delhi Transport Corporation Versus Smt. Ved Wati & Others and F.A.O. 136/83, Smt. Ved Wati & Others versus Chattar Sain & Others,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Anguri Devi Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-07-1997
Election
Constitution of India - Article 14; Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 53, 175 and 175(1)
AIR1998P& H31; (1997)117PLR218
O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. and; Madan Dev, Adv.
Ashok Bhan, J.1. Prayer made in this petition is for striking down Explanation 2(ii) to Section 175 of the Haryana Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), being ultra vires the Constitution of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Electricals Insulation (P) Ltd. Vs. Faridabad Complex Adminis ...
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-21-1995
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 17, Rule 3
(1996)114PLR215
O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. and; Parmod Goyal, Adv.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Does the dismissal of a suit under Order 17 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 operate as res judicata? This is the short question that arises in this appeal....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Maya Construction Company and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-22-2003
Trusts and Societies
Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
AIR2004P& H35; (2004)136PLR33
O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. and; Akshav Goyal and; B.S. Rakra
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. With a view to deal with the problems of Cooperative Labour and Construction Societies, Government of Punjab vide notification dated 9.8.1979 (Annexure Rl) in CWP No. 5998 of 2000) constituted a Board consisting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhool Kumar and ors. Vs. Mr. Gurdial Singh and ors.
Delhi
Aug-31-1998
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections II-1 and 95
2001ACJ24; 1998VIAD(Delhi)536; 1998(47)DRJ618
Mr. O.P. Goyal, Adv
Usha Mehra, J. 1. These two appeals arise from a common judgment delivered by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (in short the Tribunal) touching the same facts, cause of action and question of law. Hence taken...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShama Kaur and ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and ors.
Delhi
May-19-2008
Motor VehiclesCriminal
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 160, 163A, 163A(3), 166, 168, 171, 173 and 217; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 4A(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 92A and 110A; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34
2008ACJ2453
O.P. Goyal, Adv
Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the Act') against the judgment dated 18.4.1996, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLekh Raj and anr. Vs. Suram Singh and ors.
Delhi
Jan-22-2007
Motor Vehicles
Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
2007ACJ2165
O.P. Goyal, Adv
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Appellants, parents of the deceased Ranjan Kumar, who died in an accident on 3.5.1993 seek enhancement of compensation awarded.2. The award is dated 15.5.2003. Loss of dependency to the appellants has been worked...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinder Pal Vs. Sat Narain
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-25-2004
Property
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 13(2) and 15(6)
(2004)138PLR832
O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. and; Ram Tilak, Adv.
N.K. Sud, J.1. This civil revision is directed against the order of the Appellate Authority, Rohtak dated 6.8.1986 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner-tenant against the order of the Rent Controller, Bahadurgarh dated 11.12.1985.2. Sat Narain,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagpal Steels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-31-2001
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G(3)
2001(78)ECC338; 2002(144)ELT46(P& H)
O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. and; Gargi Kumar, Adv.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. These are two petitions under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Company and its Director are the petitioners. They pray that the Appellate Tribunal be directed to refer the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-16-2001
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944; Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 10(3); Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 16 and 238(1); Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18AA, 18AA (1) and 18F; Central Excise Rule, 1944 - Rules 9, 47, 49, 49(1), 52, 52A, 53, 57AB to 57Q, 173G and 173G(1)
2001(134)ELT14(P& H)
O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by; Bhuwan Luthra, Adv.
ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether the facility available to petitioner the under the Rule 49(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (in short, the Rules) to pay central excise duty (hereinafter referred to as duty) on fortnightly-basis...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »