Advanced Search Results
Kalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Sep-05-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)78TTJ(JP.)653
Shri. O.P. Agarwal
1. This appeal preferred by the assessee arises from the order dt. 1st Jan., 1999, of the learned CIT(A), Rajasthan-I, Jaipur, for the asst.yr. 1995-96.2. Various grounds raised by the assessee relate to the controversy of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR P S Yadav Sub Inspector (Fire) vs.union of India and Ors
Delhi
Nov-24-2017
Right to Information
Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Mrs. Bharathi Raju
$~33. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Advocate. R P S YADAV SUB INSPECTOR (FIRE) + W.P.(C) 10434/2017, CM APPL. Nos. 42630-631/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDas's Friends Builders Pvt. Ltd. through Director Sri Anil Kumar Agarw ...
Allahabad
Aug-09-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 34(1), 139, 142(1), 143(1), 143(3), 145(2), 147 and 148 to 153; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 26
(2006)201CTR(All)447; [2006]280ITR77(All)
O.P. Agarwal and ;Rohit Agarwal, Advs.
Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present revision, following reliefs has been claimed.a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the slow cause notice dated 26.7.1999 issued by the respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Panchu Ram Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-20-2004
LimitationProperty
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 6, 9, 11, 11A and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
2004(3)AWC2143
S.O.P. Agarwal, ;Rohit Agarwal and ;Sanjai Srivastava, Advs.
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The petitioner claims to be the owner of plot No. 25/1 and plot No. 22 measuring 43 decimal and 20,5 decimal respectively situate at village Habibpura, Pargana Dehat Amanat. Tehsil and District Varanasi....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx. Hc/Gd Prahalad vs.union of India and Ors.
Delhi
Sep-13-2019
Land Acquisition
$~1 to 7, 9 and 10 and 13 to 61 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8203/2019 EX. HC/GD PRAHALAD ....... Petitioner Through Mr. O.P.Agarwal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakeel Ahmed Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Others
Delhi
May-26-2015
Land Acquisition
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h May, 2015 +CRL.A. 528/2012 SHAKEEL AHMED Through: ..... Appellant Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxmi Datt Patni vs.union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Aug-16-2017
Land Acquisition
4 (14.08.2017) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 12204/2016 LAXMI DATT PATNI Through: Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. Date of decision:16. h August, 2017 ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...........
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheoraj Vs. Ma Accord Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Allahabad
Feb-11-2011
Civil
Specific Relief Act - Sections 34, 38 and 41;
Shri. S.O.P. Agrawal
1. We have heard Shri S.O.P. Agarwal for the plaintiff-appellant. Shri Shashi Nandan assisted by Shri Anoop Trivedi appears for the defendant-respondents. 2. This First Appeal From Order arises out of an order passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijendra Kumar Mamodia Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Dec-17-2002
Direct Taxation
1. This appeal by the assessee arises from the order dt. 22nd Feb., 2000 of learned CIT(A), Rajasthan-II, Jaipur for the .asst. yr.1994-95. The assessee has challenged the addition of Rs. 10,64,500 on account of investment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijendra Kumar Mamodia Vs. Dy. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Dec-17-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)81TTJ(JP.)684
This appeal by the assessee arises from the order dated 22-2-2000 of learned Commissioner (Appeals), Rajasthan-II, Jaipur for the assessment year 1994-95. The assessee has challenged the addition of Rs. 10,64,500 on account of investment in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »