Advanced Search Results

Das's Friends Builders Pvt. Ltd. through Director Sri Anil Kumar Agarw ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 34(1), 139, 142(1), 143(1), 143(3), 145(2), 147 and 148 to 153; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 26

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(All)447; [2006]280ITR77(All)

Advocate for Appellant : O.P. Agarwal and ;Rohit Agarwal, Advs.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present revision, following reliefs has been claimed.a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the slow cause notice dated 26.7.1999 issued by the respondent...

Panchu Ram Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 6, 9, 11, 11A and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2143

Advocate for Appellant : S.O.P. Agarwal, ;Rohit Agarwal and ;Sanjai Srivastava, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The petitioner claims to be the owner of plot No. 25/1 and plot No. 22 measuring 43 decimal and 20,5 decimal respectively situate at village Habibpura, Pargana Dehat Amanat. Tehsil and District Varanasi....

Ex. Hc/Gd Prahalad vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~1 to 7, 9 and 10 and 13 to 61 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8203/2019 EX. HC/GD PRAHALAD ....... Petitioner Through Mr. O.P.Agarwal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA...

Shakeel Ahmed Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h May, 2015 +CRL.A. 528/2012 SHAKEEL AHMED Through: ..... Appellant Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) &...

Laxmi Datt Patni vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

4 (14.08.2017) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 12204/2016 LAXMI DATT PATNI Through: Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Adv. Date of decision:16. h August, 2017 ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...........

Kalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)78TTJ(JP.)653

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. O.P. Agarwal

1. This appeal preferred by the assessee arises from the order dt. 1st Jan., 1999, of the learned CIT(A), Rajasthan-I, Jaipur, for the asst.yr. 1995-96.2. Various grounds raised by the assessee relate to the controversy of...

Sheoraj Vs. Ma Accord Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 34, 38 and 41;

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.O.P. Agrawal

1. We have heard Shri S.O.P. Agarwal for the plaintiff-appellant. Shri Shashi Nandan assisted by Shri Anoop Trivedi appears for the defendant-respondents. 2. This First Appeal From Order arises out of an order passed by the...

R P S Yadav Sub Inspector (Fire) vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Mrs. Bharathi Raju

$~33. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Advocate. R P S YADAV SUB INSPECTOR (FIRE) + W.P.(C) 10434/2017, CM APPL. Nos. 42630-631/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND...

Bhanwar Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj147

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 8.9.1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Karauli whereby cognizance for offences under Sections 304, 498-A, 201 and 202 of the I.P.C. was taken...

M/S. Bec Strips Limited Vs. Cce, Raipur

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Mahesh Rastogi and Shri Vijay Kumar, Authorised Representative (DR) for the Revenue

Per D.N. PANDA: The appellant is not present today despite several notices. There is an application to grant further opportunity to the appellant for hearing. 2. Revenue’s submission is that the present appellant has not become...