Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: none appeared · Page 1 of about 8,920 results (0.354 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 23 2009

Horlicks Ltd. and anr. Vs. Heinz India (Pvt.) Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-2009

Subject : CivilMedia and Communication

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Specific Relief Act, 1887; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 37, 41, 41(6) and 56; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33; Central Excise Act; United Kingdom Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982; United Kingdom Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Amendment) Act, 1991; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 10, 16 to 20, 21, 22 to 25 and 151 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 9, Rules 2, 3, 5 and 8 - Order 10, Rule 4 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 15, Rules 1, 2 and 4 - Order 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT539

Advocate for Appellant : C.M. Lall,; Dushyant K. Mahant and; Kripa Pandit, Advs

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The principle of forum non convenience emerged as a concept primarily applicable to a foreign forum. The important question whether it will apply to domestic forum in India governed by Code of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 1957

Abdul Shakur and ors. Vs. Kotwaleshwar Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-19-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 100 to 101 and 103; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 52, 115, 116, 117 and 167; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 49, 49(1) and 75; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118

Reported in : AIR1958All54

Advocate for Appellant : M.H. Beg, ;Satish Chander and ;K.L. Misra, Advs.

Chowdhry, J. 1. This is a second appeal under the second proviso or, in the alternative, a revision under the first proviso, to Section 75 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920. by the three creditors Abdul...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1978

Ranbir Chandra Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-19-1978

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi241; 1978LabIC1027; 1978RLR328

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Sanghvi,; Mohinder Narain,; Manju Malhotra,;

V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) This Letters patent Appeal is directed against the order, dated 15th November, 1977, of the learned single Judge, by which the operation of the order of respondent No. 1, passed on 22-7-77...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 26 2006

District Administration Vs. Commissioner of Inquiry and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-26-2006

Subject : Civil

B.P. Katakey, J. 1. The Government of Meghalaya in exercise of the power conferred by Section 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 (Act No. 60 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), upon...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2005

Thonduri Changa Reddy Vs. Chillakuru Chandra Sekhara Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hindu Succession Act - Sections 14(1); Registration Act - Sections 17; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2006(1)ALT175

Advocate for Appellant : M. Ravaindranath Reddy, Adv.

ORDERC.V. Ramulu, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by an Order dated 14-2-2005 passed in I.A. No. 30 of 2004 in A.S. No. 17 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1966

State of U.P. Vs. Neel Kanth and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-03-1966

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5 and 9

Reported in : AIR1967All447; 1967CriLJ1250

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Kapoor, Adv.

R.N. Sharma, J.1. This is an appeal by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Hardoi, acquitting the respondents, Neel Kanth and Drigpal of the charges under Sections 399...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2007

Bali Puran and ors. Vs. Saheba Puran and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-30-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144, 145(1), 145(8) and 146

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2197; [2008(1)JCR60(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : A.R. Choudhary, Adv.

D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioners in this application have prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings pending against them in the court of the Subdivisional Magistrate, Bundu, Ranchi, in Misc. Petition No. MP.6/06/M-92 of 2006 as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2003

Bhagat Singh and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-01-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 406 and 498A

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)144; 108(2003)DLT259; I(2004)DMC22; 2003(71)DRJ530; 2004(1)JCC161

Advocate for Appellant : Anand Maheshwari, Adv

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 215/2002 u/Ss. 406/498-A/34 IPC, P.S., Prasad Nagar, Delhi. 2. Petitioner no. 1 is the husband; petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 26 2011

Deutsche Bank Ag Vs. Prithvi Information Solutions Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-26-2011

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - 433, 434, 439, 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860. - Sections 420, 405, 406, 409, 120-B 34, 433, 434

Advocate for Appellant : S.Ravi, Adv.

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J.ORDER:1. This company petition has been taken out by Deutsche Bank AG under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 95 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 seeking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2003

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Superior Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-20-2003

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 105(2003)DLT586; 2003(27)PTC63(Del); 2003(3)RAJ224

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv. and; Manmohan Singh, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. The present order disposes of is No. 6394/2003 filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC & LA. No. 6584/2003 filed by the defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial