Advanced Search Results

Om Prakash Joshi, Advocate and ors Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(4), 24(8), 35 and 321; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(3), 14, 16, 16(1), 124(2), 126, 162, 163, 165, 165(2), 165(3), 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 222, 222(1), 226, 319, 361(1), 367 and 368 ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(7) - Order 3, Rule 4(2) and Rule 4(6); General Clauses Act - Sections 13; Advocates Act, 1961 ;

Reported in : AIR2002Raj33; 2001(3)WLC199; 2001(3)WLN632

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Bhandari, Adv.

Lakshmanan, C.J. (1). The petitioners in the instant writ petition are the practicing advocates at Jodhpur. They filed the writ petition with the followingprayers:-'It is, therefore, prayed that a writ, direction or order or in the...

P. Rajender Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rules 10(1) and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494 and 498-A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 309

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD290

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pratap Narayan Sanghi, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Sinha, C.J.1. The validity of order of suspension passed as far back on 15-5-1999 against the petitioner, a Junior Checker in Security Printing Press, Hyderabad is in question in this writ petition.2. In short, the...

i.T.C. Limited Vs. Pradeep Anand and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 4, 14, 14(2), 16(1), 17, 19, 20, 20(4), 30 and 33; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 27B, 30B, 30C, 30D, 30E, 48B and 48B(1); Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 16, 16(1) and 23; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81(1), 286, 372, 373, 372(4) and 372(5); Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985; Arbitration Act, 1889 - Sections 4 and 19; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 35; Contract Act, 1872; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UC; Conciliation and Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce Rules - Rule 83; Companies (Central Governments) General Rules, 1956 - Rule 11C; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 -

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR67(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv.,; Pravin Bahadur,; Meghalee,;

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The parties to the present dispute sought to co-operate amongst themselves for furtherance of their business interest and entered into a Co-operation Agreement dated 11.09.1990. Instead of there being any co-operation, the...

D.Vijayakumari Vs. State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by Home

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : The Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 8, 147, 148, 448, 427, 506(ii); The Constitution Of India 1949 - Article 22(5); The Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 ; Tamilnadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act ; Tamilnadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, 2003 - Section 3, 4; The Tamilnadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982) ; Tamilnadu Act 14 of 1982 - Section 8

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.N.R.Elango, SC, Adv

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records related to the petitioner's husband's detention under Tamilnadu Act 14 of...

Meghnath Saikia Vs. Xinmin

Court : Guwahati

Subject : BankingCriminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhowmik

H.N. Sarma, J.1. Legality and validity of the appellate judgment and order dated 25.4.07 passed in Case No. 2867c/2000; 2868c/2000 and 2869c/ 2000 thereby affirmed the conviction but modified the sentence imposed upon the petitioner by...

Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh Vs. Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Reported in : (2009)154PLR179

Vinod K. Sharma, J.1. Plaintiff/Appellant brought a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is in possession of 11 kanals 4 marlas of land as owner with consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from dispossessing...

D.R. Yadav and anr. Vs. R.K. Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 - Sections 4, 5, 5(2), 5A, 5A(2), 55, 59(1) and 59(3); Uttar Pradesh (Regulation of Building Operations) Act, 1958; Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1959; Uttar Pradesh Palika (Centralized) Services Rules, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991 - Rules 6, 25(3) and 28; Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Service Rules, 1985 - Rules 3, 7 and 7(1); Public Service Commission (Procedure) Rules, 1970; Constitution of India - Article 309; Uttar Pradesh Planning and Development Ordinance, 1973

Reported in : AIR2003SC3935; 2003(4)AWC2600(SC); JT2003(5)SC555; 2003(5)SCALE307; (2003)7SCC110; 2004(1)SLJ19(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1903

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. and; Niranjana Singh, Adv

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Dispute of the inter se seniority between the appellants and the respondent No. 1 is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 23.5.2002 passed...

T.V. Gopalakrishnan Vs. State of Kerala, Rep. by Its Chief Secretary, ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2011(3)KLT317; 2011(3)KHC162; 2011(3)ILR(Ker)493

RamachandranNair, J. This Writ Appeal is filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge declaring that the appellant will be entitled to utilise his land situated in Kozhikkode town for commercial purpose, i.e. for construction...

Mahanagar Sudhar Samiti Vs. Akola Municipal Corporation, Through Munic ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Raskar

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Looking to the nature of controversy and as interim order has been granted by this Court, we have accepted the request of the parties to decide the matter finally at the stage...

Wipro Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1999)(63)ECC328

1. These 79 appeals are against the Order-in-Original No. 99/97-CAV, dated 16-7-1997 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, wherein the following orders have been passed :- (a) The consignments imported and allowed provisionally clearances in September,...