Advanced Search Results
Siraj Ali and ors. Vs. State and anr.
Guwahati
Feb-15-1984
Criminal
K.N. Saikia, J.1. The petitioners impugn their conviction Under Section 447/379 IPC and sentence of 10 (ten) days' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50/- each, in default simple imprisonment for 15 more days. They...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShidramappa Irappa Shivanagi Vs. Basalingappa Kushappa Kumbhar
Mumbai
Feb-26-1943
PropertyCivil
(1943)45BOMLR697
Divatia. J.1. The question arising for decision in this revisional application is whether a decree passed by the Court on evidence led by the plaintiff after the defendant's pleader withdrew for want of instructions is an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasalingappa Kushappa Kumbhar and ors. Vs. Shidramappa Irappa Shivanag ...
Mumbai
Feb-26-1943
Civil
AIR1943Bom321
Divatia, J.1. The question arising for decision in this revisional application is whether a decree passed by the Court on evidence led by the plaintiff after the defendant's pleader withdrew for want of instructions is an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re All India Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes)
Mumbai
Apr-09-1951
Labour and Industrial
(1951)53BOMLR958
Kania, C.J.1. [Mahajan J., Das J., and Bose J., concurring.] In these appeals the question whether the Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes) had jurisdiction to make the awards has been directed by the Court to be tried...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. Vs. Rajkumar Lines Limited
Mumbai
Nov-21-1969
Civil
(1970)72BOMLR271; 1970MhLJ503
Mr. Kotwal
Vaidya, J.1. [His Lordship after stating the facts, proceeded]. In view of these contentions before us, the first question that arises in these two appeals is whether the orders passed by Mr. Justice Mody in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjan Lal Verma and anr. Vs. Rawel Kaur
Delhi
Jul-20-1981
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 2(3)
AIR1982Delhi148; 20(1981)DLT361; 1981RLR593
M.L. Patney and; O.L. Rawal, Advs
T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) A suit was instituted in the court below under Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, as amended in 1976. On 23rd April 1980 the summons was tendered to the defendant, but...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Stores, Ajmer Vs. Cloth Merchants Association, Ajmer
Rajasthan
Mar-31-1964
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 5, Rule 1(2) - Order 41, Rules 17 and 19
AIR1964Raj197
M.D. Bhargava, Adv.
Modi, J.1. This is an application by Messrs. Chandra Stores, Ajmer, appellant in D. B. Civil First Appeal No. 46 of 1956, under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArunachala Goundan Vs. Katha Goundan and ors.
Chennai
Mar-11-1924
Civil
(1924)47MLJ514
Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. There were two suits before the District Munsif, the one he dismissed for default on account of the non-appearance of the plaintiff, and in the other he passed an ex parte decree on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChidambaram Chettiar, Son of Ponnayyan Chettiar and anr. Vs. R.A.S. Ra ...
Chennai
Sep-30-1938
PropertyCivil
AIR1939Mad654; (1939)1MLJ687
Abdur Rahman, J.1. These are two connected second appeals and relate to costs. They arise out of a suit for redemption filed by one Ramaswami Chettiar in the following circumstances. Originally the eastern portion of a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSrinivasa Ranga Rao Pantulu, by the Official Assignee, High Court Vs. ...
Chennai
Nov-24-1914
Civil
(1915)28MLJ67
Oldfield, J.1. I have had the advantage of reading the judgment which my learned brother is about to deliver and I agree with him that the learned Judge's dismissal of the appeal cannot be supported on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »