Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: no appearance · Page 1 of about 11,181 results (2.015 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 1984

Siraj Ali and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-15-1984

Subject : Criminal

K.N. Saikia, J.1. The petitioners impugn their conviction Under Section 447/379 IPC and sentence of 10 (ten) days' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50/- each, in default simple imprisonment for 15 more days. They...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1943

Shidramappa Irappa Shivanagi Vs. Basalingappa Kushappa Kumbhar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-1943

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR697

Divatia. J.1. The question arising for decision in this revisional application is whether a decree passed by the Court on evidence led by the plaintiff after the defendant's pleader withdrew for want of instructions is an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1951

In Re All India Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-09-1951

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1951)53BOMLR958

Kania, C.J.1. [Mahajan J., Das J., and Bose J., concurring.] In these appeals the question whether the Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes) had jurisdiction to make the awards has been directed by the Court to be tried...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 1943

Basalingappa Kushappa Kumbhar and ors. Vs. Shidramappa Irappa Shivanag ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-1943

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1943Bom321

Divatia, J.1. The question arising for decision in this revisional application is whether a decree passed by the Court on evidence led by the plaintiff after the defendant's pleader withdrew for want of instructions is an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1924

Arunachala Goundan Vs. Katha Goundan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-1924

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1924)47MLJ514

Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. There were two suits before the District Munsif, the one he dismissed for default on account of the non-appearance of the plaintiff, and in the other he passed an ex parte decree on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 1969

Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. Vs. Rajkumar Lines Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-21-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR271; 1970MhLJ503

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kotwal

Vaidya, J.1. [His Lordship after stating the facts, proceeded]. In view of these contentions before us, the first question that arises in these two appeals is whether the orders passed by Mr. Justice Mody in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1981

Arjan Lal Verma and anr. Vs. Rawel Kaur

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 2(3)

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi148; 20(1981)DLT361; 1981RLR593

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Patney and; O.L. Rawal, Advs

T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) A suit was instituted in the court below under Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, as amended in 1976. On 23rd April 1980 the summons was tendered to the defendant, but...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2003

Ripan Wadhwa Vs. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : 2003(68)DRJ477; 2003(26)PTC511(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Pravin Anand, Adv

Vikramajit Sen, J. 1. By this Order, I shall dispose off the Defendant's/Judgment Debtor's application for setting aside the ex-parte decree dated 19.2.1996 (IA No. 10507/01); application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2002

In Re: Highland Electro Appliances Private Limited;

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-05-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 235 to 251 and 391 to 394

Reported in : 2003(66)DRJ593; [2003]42SCL516(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. and; Ranjana Ray Gavai, Adv; Manis

Vikramajit Sen, J. 1. These petitions have been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, praying for sanction to be accorded to the Scheme of Amalgamation of Highland Electro Appliances Private Limited (Transferor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1938

Chidambaram Chettiar, Son of Ponnayyan Chettiar and anr. Vs. R.A.S. Ra ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-30-1938

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1939Mad654; (1939)1MLJ687

Abdur Rahman, J.1. These are two connected second appeals and relate to costs. They arise out of a suit for redemption filed by one Ramaswami Chettiar in the following circumstances. Originally the eastern portion of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial