Advanced Search Results

Balaji Property and Developers, a Partnership Firm, Registered Under t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11; ;Land Revenue Code, 1968 - Section 44; ;Indian Trust Act - Section 34; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 90 - Order 36, Rules 1, 3, 3(2), 4 and 5; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 15 and 15(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2010(2)BomCR527

Advocate for Appellant : Nitin Thakkar, Sr. Adv. and; S.N. Joshi, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 521 OF 2009 and;Party-In-Person

U.D. Salvi, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of the parties.2. One M/s. Balaji Property and Developers purchasers of the property bearing Survey No. 224/1, 224/2 and 224/3 admeasuring about 44147 square metres situate at...

Harshad Jethalal Shah and anr. and Maanish Kantilal Patel and anr. Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 144

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR11

Advocate for Appellant : Virag Tulzapurkar and ;S. Srikrishna, Advs., i/b., P.C. Mankad, Adv., ;T.N. Subramanian and ;Paresh Shah, Advs., i/b., Shah & Sanghavi and ;A.Y. Bookwala and ;Madhvi Diwan, Advs., i/b., Manisha Ka

ORDERS.U. Kamdar, J.1. By the present notice of motion the applicants are challenging clause 4 of the consent terms dated 15.4.2004 executed by and between the plaintiffs and the defendants. By prayer (b), (c) and (d)...

Ravi Prakash Khemka and anr. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 37, Rule 2

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR631; 2007(5)BomCR876; 2007(3)MhLj8

Advocate for Appellant : D.D. Madon and ;K.R. Davierwala, Advs., i/b., ;Mulla and Mulla and ;C.B. and Caroe

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The defendants are in Appeal, aggrieved by the order dated 5th September, 2005 whereby the learned single Judge directed the defendants to deposit a sum of Rs. 80 lacs in the Court within...

Ganjam Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Panther Investrade Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 3(2), 8, 9A and 9B; Arbitration Act, 1940- Sections 9A(1)

Reported in : 2003(1)BomCR330; [2004]119CompCas766(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas and ;Z.I. Andhyarunina, Advs. i./b., Crawford Bayley and Co., ;V.R. Dhond and ;C.S. Kapadia, Advs. i/b., A.N. Nasikwala, Adv.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. Heard Mr. Thakkar, learned senior counsel for the inter-vener. Intervention application is allowed.2. The petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is moved by Ganjam Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd,...

Mr. A.R. Khan Construwell and Co. Vs. Youth Education and Welfare Soci ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 36 and 36(1); Income Tax Act

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR511; 2006(1)BomCR170; (2005)107BOMLR231; 2006(2)MhLj595

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Apte, Sr. Adv. and ;S.S. Kulkarni, Adv. in Letter Patent Appeal No. 449 of 2004 in Writ Petition No. 6458 of 2003, ;S.G. Deshmukh, Adv. in Letter Patent Appeal No. 454 of 2004 in Writ Petition No

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These three LPAs are concerned with an immovable property of the first Respondent bearing Survey No. 643-b corresponding to CTS No. 614-b or final Plot No. 127 and PTR No. F/1892/at Nasik admeasuring...

Anil Govindrao Kulkarni Vs. Sangli Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : DRAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/original defendant No.6 Mr. A.G. Kulkarni, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 29th August, 2003 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of D.R.T.-I, Mumbai in Original Application...

Suresh Arjundas Bakhtiani Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 41

Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR26

Advocate for Appellant : Nitin Thakkar, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka J.1. The petitioner has filed this petition for an interim injunction seeking to restrain the first respondent, their officers, servants, representatives and agents from encashing bank guarantee bond No. 1-10, dated January 23, 1990,...

Vijaya Bank Vs. Maker Development Services Pvt. Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 28(1), 34, 34(2), 34(3), 34(4), 34(5), 35 and 37(1); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 30, 33 and 39; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Contract Act - Sections 55; U.N.C.I.T.R.A.L. Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985; U.N.C.I.T.R.A.L. Conciliation Rules, 1980; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11), 15A and 28; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR143; 2001(3)BomCR652

Advocate for Appellant : Nitin Thakkar, ;P.K. Samdani, ;J.K. Ashar and ;Kiran Shah, Advs., i/b., K. Ashar & Co.

B. B. Srikrishna. J. 1. This appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') challenges the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 6th/7th November, 2000 dismissing...

Saurabh Kalani Vs. Tata Finance Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 12, 16 and 34; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 18(8), 19(2), 22 and 22(1)

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR600; [2003]116CompCas316(Bom); [2003]42SCL702(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Nitin Thakkar, Amicus Curiae;H.N. Thakore, Adv.

ORDERD.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. In these proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a challenge is sought to be preferred to the award of a sole arbitrator dated 25th August, 2001. Two significant...

R.S. Jiwani Vs. Ircon International Ltd., a Government of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1899; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 89 and 100A; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 15, 16, 30 and 49; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 4A(1), 5, 16(6), 32, 34, 34(2), 34(4), 35, 36, 43 and 86; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act, 1963; General Clauses Act, 1897; Oil Seeds (Forward Contract Prohibition) Order, 1943; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 55 and 73; Conciliation Rules

Advocate for Appellant : Nitin Thakkar, Sr. Adv., ;Markand Gandhi, ;Gaurav Joshi, ;Kapil Moye, ;Tanvi Gandhi, ;Satyen Vora, ;Prashant Ghelani and ;Rohan Yagnik, Advs., i/b., M. Gandhi & Co. and ;S.U. Kamdar, ;Hetal Thak

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. The Law of Arbitration was earlier governed by Indian Arbitration Act, 1899. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 also provided for arbitration as Special Proceedings in the following terms:89. Arbitration. (1) Save in...