Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: nem · Page 1 of about 292 results (0.161 seconds)

May 16 2006

Astrazeneca Uk Ltd. and anr. Vs. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 19, 23, 27(2), 28, 28(2), 28(3), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 33, 107, 124, 125, 144 and 154; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 111 and 111(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 2006(32)PTC733(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.,; V.S. Yadav,; Ashok Mathur,;

Anil Kumar, J.1. This order shall dispose of plaintiffs' application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure seeking restraint against the defendant from using his registered trade...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2006

Ramesh Alias Pappu Vs. Mst. Sharda

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-06-2006

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj1105

Harbans Lal, J.1. This revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 22.2.2005 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge No. 2, Bharatpur in criminal Revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2024

Sita Soren Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : __ GAURAV AGRAWAL

Reportable 2024 INSC161IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.451 of 2019 Sita Soren …Appellant Versus Union of India …Respondent Page 1 of 135 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

May 07 1992

Sahab Singh and Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-07-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)101

M.B. Sharma, J.1. The learned Special Judge, Dacoity Affected Area, Bharatpur, has convicted each of the accused appellants, namely, Sahab Singh and Jagdish-father and son; respectively, under Section 302/34 IPC and 302 IPC; respectively. Each of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1988

Ram Lakhan Missir Vs Pandit Raghunandan Missir

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-05-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1989Pat145

1. This appeal arises out of a suit for partition. The plaintiff is the appellant. The relationship between the parties is shown in the genealogical table in schedule A of the plaint. The properties in which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1988

Ram Lakhan Missir Vs. Pandit Raghunandan Missir

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-05-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1989Pat145

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2020

Sajeesh K.S vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-14-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2020 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1942 OP(KAT).No.71 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2020