Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: nem · Page 1 of about 275 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 2006

Astrazeneca Uk Ltd. and anr. Vs. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 19, 23, 27(2), 28, 28(2), 28(3), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 33, 107, 124, 125, 144 and 154; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 111 and 111(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 2006(32)PTC733(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.,; V.S. Yadav,; Ashok Mathur,;

Anil Kumar, J.1. This order shall dispose of plaintiffs' application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure seeking restraint against the defendant from using his registered trade...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2006

Ramesh Alias Pappu Vs. Mst. Sharda

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-06-2006

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj1105

Harbans Lal, J.1. This revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 22.2.2005 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge No. 2, Bharatpur in criminal Revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2024

Sita Soren Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : __ GAURAV AGRAWAL

Reportable 2024 INSC161IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.451 of 2019 Sita Soren …Appellant Versus Union of India …Respondent Page 1 of 135 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 05 1988

Ram Lakhan Missir Vs Pandit Raghunandan Missir

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-05-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1989Pat145

1. This appeal arises out of a suit for partition. The plaintiff is the appellant. The relationship between the parties is shown in the genealogical table in schedule A of the plaint. The properties in which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1988

Ram Lakhan Missir Vs. Pandit Raghunandan Missir

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-05-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1989Pat145

1. This appeal arises out of a suit for partition. The plaintiff is the appellant. The relationship between the parties is shown in the genealogical table in schedule A of the plaint. The properties in which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1955

Shivramsa Benakosa Merwade Vs. Gurunathsa Bhavansa Kabadi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-1955

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR239

Dixit, J.1. This appeal arises from a suit to enforce a mortgage. The facts leading up to the suit may be shortly stated.2. The mortgaged property, which is house property, is more particularly described in para....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 1991

V.T. Krishnamoorthy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-13-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 11A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1183; 1991(2)KarLJ158

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Sundaraswamy, Sr. Adv. and ;K. Balakrishna, Adv.

ORDERMohan, C.J. 1. The short facts leading to this Writ Petition are as follows:-The property in question which is a building, is sought to be acquired for public purpose, to wit, for construction of HMT Ltd....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 1993

M/S. Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-09-1993

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Electrictiy (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 384; Superme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 15(1)

Reported in : AIR1994All273

Advocate for Appellant : Vinod Sinha, Adv.

ORDERR.A. Sharma, J.1. Whether petitioners, who are consumers of electricity, are liable to pay additional charges on the electricity dues, payment of which was not made on or before the due date in view of interim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1948

The Collector of Etah Vs. Nem Kuar

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-08-1948

Subject : Family Civil

Reported in : AIR1948All330

Malik, C.J.1. This appeal has been filed by the Collector of Etah as Manager of the Court of Wards in charge of the estate of Rajendra Kumar. The parties to this litigation are Jain Hindus. One...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2003

Nar Bahadur Bhandari Etc. Vs. State, Etc.

Court : Sikkim

Decided on : May-01-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2(5), 154(2), 196 and 240; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 196(2); Prevention of Corruption Act (Amendment), 1988 - Sections 13(1), 13(2) and 30; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Delhi Special Police Establisment Act, 1946 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 5(3)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2799

Advocate for Appellant : Milon Kumar Mukherjee, Sr. Adv.,; Bhaskar Raj Pradhan,;

Ripusudan Dayal, C.J.1. All these Criminal Revisions have been filed to challenge the Order dated 15-11-2002 by the learned Special Judge, P. C. Act, Sikkim at Gangtok in Criminal Case No. 8/1997 ordering the framing of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial