Advanced Search Results
Stracon India Ltd. Vs. Utv Software Communication Ltd.
Delhi
Aug-29-2001
Arbitration
Arbitration Act - Sections 7, 11, 13 and 16; Indian Arbitration and Reconciliation Act, 1996; Negotiable of the Instruments Act - Sections 138
AIR2002Delhi209; 2002(62)DRJ829
Mr. Neeraj Kaul and; Mr. Anish Dayal, Advs
ORDERJ.D. KAPOOR, J.1. Through this application under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act the petitioner has sought the appointment of the Arbitrator on the basis of the agreement dated 25.3.98. Clause 18 of the said agreement...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. V.J.A. Flynn and Mr. Shyam Sunder Rastogi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...
Delhi
Nov-26-2002
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 108, 110, 113, 118, 122, 124 and 135; Antiquities and Art Treasure Act, 1972 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 24; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 9; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(1), 143(2) and 148
2003(66)DRJ381; 2003(86)ECC129; 2003(159)ELT92(Del)
Neeraj Kaul, Sr. Adv. and; Tarun Banga, Adv
Sharda Aggarwal, J.1. Challenge in these two writ petitions CW.No. 4624/97, filed by V.J.A.Flynn and CW.No. 1985/2001, filed Shyam Sunder Rastogi, is to the validity of the show cause notice dated 2nd December, 1994, issued by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askintermedia Cable Communications Pvt. Ltd. Versus M/S Zee Turner Ltd. a ...
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Jan-15-2010
MRTP
FOR THE PETITIONERS: NEERAJ KAUL, SENIOR ADVOCATE, NAVIN CHAWLA, SHARATH SAMPATH, ADVOCATE. FOR THE RESPONDENT: MANINDER SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE, MR. SAURABH MISHRA, ARJUN NATARAJAN NITYA THAKUR, ADVOC
This review petition has been filed purported to be under Section 16(2)(f) of the TRAI Act seeking review of this Tribunal’s order dated 16.12.2009 whereby and whereunder an application for grant of injunction filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr.
Delhi
Jan-31-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 33, 33(2), 33(4), 33(5), 33(6), 33(7), 34, 34(3) and 36; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5
2003IIAD(Delhi)115; 2003(3)ARBLR284(Delhi); 103(2003)DLT82; 2003(68)DRJ50; 2003(1)RAJ625
Neeraj Kaul, Sr. Adv. and; Rahima Nath, Adv
S. Mukerjee, J.1. This execution petition involves an interesting point of law.2. M/s Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. filed an execution petition in relation to the Award dated 25th September, 2001, seeking execution thereof in the manner of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayaswals Neco Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Sep-06-2004
Commercial
Railway Claims Tribunal Act; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 83 and 84
114(2004)DLT178
Neeraj Kaul, Sr. Adv.,; Prateek Jalan and; Nirnimesh Dube
T.S. Thakur, J. 1. In this petition for a writ of certiorari, the petitioner company calls in question the legality of a demand raised by the respondents for the recovery of what is described as 'undercharge'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurinder Kumar and ors. Vs. Swarn Singh
Delhi
May-21-2008
Civil
Income Tax Act - Sections 34A; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53(A); Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17
150(2008)DLT294; 2008(104)DRJ93
Neeraj Kaul, Sr. Adv. and; Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv
S. Muralidhar, J.1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 24th January, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the plaintiff's is No. 3002/2000 under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Kamlesh Sharma Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr.
Delhi
Oct-03-2002
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 47
2003(66)DRJ237; 2003(3)SLJ394(Delhi)
Arvind Chaudhary, Adv.,; Neeraj Kaul, Sr. Adv. and; Anupam
ORDER The Special Officer exercising powers of the Corporation has vide decision No. 4128/GW/Corp. dated 27.9.1994 approved for providing medical facilities to the pensioners of Municipal Corporation of Delhi by the Corporation to the following extent:-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Finance Ltd. Vs. Viniyoga International Ltd. and ors.
Delhi
Apr-22-1999
Contract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order xxxvII
1999IVAD(Delhi)220; 79(1999)DLT342
Mr. Neeraj Kaul with; Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv
ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. This appeal by the plaintiff/appellant is directed against the order dated 19th February, 1998 of learned Single Judge ordering issue of ordinary summons in the suit filed under the provisions of Order xxxvII...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamunia Fabricators Sdn Bhd and ors. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporati ...
Delhi
Aug-13-2008
Contract
2008(2)CTLJ346(Del); 2008(105)DRJ664
Neeraj K Kaul, Sr. Adv.,; Ashok Sagar and; R. Vasanth,
Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioners have filed the present writ petition, challenging the rejection of the bid, submitted by petitioner No. 1 in respect of B-22 Field Development Project. A direction is further sought for quashing of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMillenium Delhi Broadcast Pvt. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Sep-14-2007
Land Acquisition
1. In these petitions the petitioner prays for injunction against the respondent from encashing the bank guarantees furnished by the petitioner to the respondent. Prayer is also made that the respondent be directed to return the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »