Advanced Search Results

Om Parkash and ors. Vs. Chuni Lal and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Order 26 Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 227

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv.

1. By means of this petition the petitioners (here-in-after referred to as the defendants) have challenged the order dated 24.02.2011 whereby the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Nadaun has allowed the application filed by the plaintiffs...

Prem Chand and Etc. Vs. Jagar Nathu and Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 100

Reported in : AIR2006HP78,2006(3)ShimLC177

Advocate for Appellant : Bhupender Gupta, Sr. Counsel and; Neeraj Gupta, Adv.

K.C. Sood, J.1. These two Second Appeals No. 324/1997 and 325/1997 arise out of the common judgment of the learned Additional District Judge, Solan, dated 31st July, 1997.2. The two appeals were admitted by identical orders...

Bal Krishnan Sharma Vs. Tek Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 to 147; ;Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 - Section 418; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 378(4)

Reported in : I(2007)BC138,2006CriLJ1993

Advocate for Appellant : Neeraj Gupta, Adv.

K.C. Sood, J.1. Would a cheque Issued after the date of closure of an account in a Bank fall within the mischief of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ('Act' for short) is the question...

Bal Krishan Sharma Vs. Tek Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 to 147; ;Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 1988; ;Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 - Section 418; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 378(4)

Reported in : 2006(1)ShimLC385

Advocate for Appellant : Neeraj Gupta, Adv.

K.C. Sood, J.1. Would a cheque issued after the date of closure of an account in a Bank fall within the mischief of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? ('Act' for short) is the question...

Smt. Sandhya Devi and anr. Vs. H.R.T.C. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154

Reported in : 2006(1)ShimLC203

Advocate for Appellant : Neeraj Gupta, Adv.

Deepak Gupta, J.1. This appeal filed by the claimants is directed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kullu, in Claim Petition No. 39/99, decided on 1.12.2001, whereby the claim petition filed by the...

Mohd. Islam Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4317; 93(2001)DLT764; 2001(59)DRJ426

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Naveen Thakur, Adv

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. A document as valuable as a dying declaration is supposed to be fool-proof, it must incorporate the particulars which it is supposed to contain. A dying declaration enjoys almost a sacrosanct status as...

Vineet Suri Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Suman Kapoor, Ms. Isha Shah, Mr. Tarun Sharma

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.27/2007 Reserved on:15. 05.2014 Date of decision:01. 08.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: VINEET SURI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Suman Kapoor, Advocate with Ms. Isha Shah...

Neeraj Gupta Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107 and 306

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT137; 2006(90)DRJ725

Advocate for Appellant : Vikas Arora, Adv

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This Revision Petition is directed against the order on charge dated 14.10.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge against the petitioner for having committed an offence punishable under Section 306 of...

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

G. Rohini, C.J. 1. Though based on different set of facts, the controversy in all the petitions centers on common issues relating to the exercise of legislative power and executive control in the administration of National...

Court on Its Own Motion (Air Pollution in Delhi) vs.union of India &am ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Mr. Sumer Singh Sandhu, Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Ms. Rajkhowa Divija, Mr. Ajay Di, Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Mr. Ajay Arora, Mr. Govind Kumar, Mrs. Biji Rajesh, Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Om Prakash

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1346/2015 & CM Nos.35024/2016, 640/2017, 4383- 4384/2017, 8565/2017, 18856/2017 & 26231-26233/2017 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION (AIR POLLUTION IN DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through:...