Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: navin sinha and · Page 1 of about 654 results (0.131 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 2006

Mawana Sugars Limited, a Company Duly Incorporated Under the Provision ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-20-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(2), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16 and 16(2); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rule 22

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1941

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Yashwant Varma, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The dispute in this writ petition pertains to the 7 cane centres, namely, (i) Paharpur-II; (ii) Kunda/Pinai-II; (iii) Niloha-IV; (iv) Naglashekhu-II; (v) Navipur/Lalpur-II; (vi) Nagli Sadhararipur-II; and (vii) Incholi-III. For the current crushing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2005

State Bank of India Through Its Deputy General Manager Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-18-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 33C(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC299; [2006(107)FLR898]; (2006)ILLJ625All

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. This is the third inning of litigation between the panics, cause of action of which arose in the year' 1969.2. Brief facts of this case as admitted to the parties are that respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2002

Pradeshia Industrial and Investment Corpn. of U.P. Ltd. Vs. State of U ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-23-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 451 and 456

Reported in : [2003]47SCL126(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Anurag Khanna, Advs.

ORDERSunil Ambwani, J.1. Pradeshia Industrial & Investment Corporation of U.P. Ltd. (hereinafter called as PICUP) has filed these Criminal Revision Nos. 41 of 2000 and 49 of 2000 against the Judgment and Order dated 20-12-1999 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 13 2006

Bhadauria Gram Sewa Sansthan Vs. Asstt. Commissioner, Sales Tax, Allah ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2(i) and 7D; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 49E; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5(1), 7(7) and 7(7A); Central excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A(4); Central Excise Rules - Rule 96ZO(3); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : [2006]148STC356(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.K.S. Chauhan and; Navin Sinha, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. Disagreeing and also doubting the correctness of the law laid down by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Jaya Bhatta Udyog v. State of U.P. (Civil Misc. Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2009

Vijay Stone Product and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-21-2009

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR2010All26

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Navin Sinha

1. Heard Shri Navin Sinha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Rakesh Kumar for the petitioners, Shri Govind Saran for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava for the respondent No. 4.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2004

In Re: Jaypee Cement Limited; in Re: Jaiprakash Industries Limited

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 21, 101(2), 103(2), 189, 391, 394, 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 11, 42 and 44

Reported in : [2004]122CompCas854(All); (2004)2CompLJ105(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Verma, Sr. Adv., ;R.P. Agarwal, Adv. representing JPC and JPI, ;Navin Sinha, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Mehrotra, Adv. representing HSBL, ;Pankaj Bhatia and ;M.C. Tewari, Advs. representing shareholders and

Sushil Harkauli, J.1. Company Petition No. 26 of 2003 has been filed jointly by the transferee company, namely, Jaypee Cement Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as JPC for short) and the transferor company, namely, Jaiprakash Industries Ltd....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2005

J.S. Gupta and Sons Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-01-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Central Excise Act - Sections 5A and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 5 and 151A

Reported in : 2005(100)ECC121; 2007(212)ELT22(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and ;Pankaj Bhatia, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, M/s J. S. Gupta and Sons, seek the following reliefs:'(i) issue suitable writ, Order or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2007

Hari Om S/O Sri Upendra Nath Tripathi Vs. Hakim Singh S/O Late Sri Jug ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-2007

Subject : Election

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC4185

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. K.R. Singh, Sri. Navin Sinha

Pankaj Mithal, J.1. This is an appeal under Rule 49(1) of the U.P. Kshettra Samities (Election of Prakukhs and Up-Prarnukhs and Settlement of Election Disputes) Rules, 1962 (for short, the Rules) framed under the U.P. Kshettra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2010

Govind Bhawan Karyalaya Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-23-2010

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Navin Sinha

1. The question of law, that requires consideration in these two Special Appeals, is as to whether the 'Variable Dearness Allowance' (VDA) in the notification dated 31.1.1992 issued under Section 4 of the Minimum of Wages...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2004

Durga Hotel Complex Vs. Reserve Bank of India and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-23-2004

Subject : Banking

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 19 and 35A

Advocate for Appellant : Navin Sinha and Alok Kr. Agrawal for Durga Hotel Complex, Chitranjan Sinha and Mukund Jee for State Bank of India and Seema Ali Khan, Adv. for Reserve Bank of India

Radha Mohan Prasad, J. 1. In first writ petition, petitioner has sought for direction to the State Bank of India to carry out the directions given to it by the Banking Ombudsman in his order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial