Advanced Search Results
Mawana Sugars Limited, a Company Duly Incorporated Under the Provision ...
Allahabad
Mar-20-2006
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(2), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16 and 16(2); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rule 22
2006(2)AWC1941
Navin Sinha and ;Yashwant Varma, Advs.
Vineet Saran, J.1. The dispute in this writ petition pertains to the 7 cane centres, namely, (i) Paharpur-II; (ii) Kunda/Pinai-II; (iii) Niloha-IV; (iv) Naglashekhu-II; (v) Navipur/Lalpur-II; (vi) Nagli Sadhararipur-II; and (vii) Incholi-III. For the current crushing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India Through Its Deputy General Manager Vs. Union of In ...
Allahabad
Aug-18-2005
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 33C(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11
2006(1)AWC299; [2006(107)FLR898]; (2006)ILLJ625All
Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.
Vineet Saran, J.1. This is the third inning of litigation between the panics, cause of action of which arose in the year' 1969.2. Brief facts of this case as admitted to the parties are that respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradeshia Industrial and Investment Corpn. of U.P. Ltd. Vs. State of U ...
Allahabad
Apr-23-2002
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 451 and 456
[2003]47SCL126(All)
Navin Sinha and ;Anurag Khanna, Advs.
ORDERSunil Ambwani, J.1. Pradeshia Industrial & Investment Corporation of U.P. Ltd. (hereinafter called as PICUP) has filed these Criminal Revision Nos. 41 of 2000 and 49 of 2000 against the Judgment and Order dated 20-12-1999 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhadauria Gram Sewa Sansthan Vs. Asstt. Commissioner, Sales Tax, Allah ...
Allahabad
Jan-13-2006
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2(i) and 7D; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 49E; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5(1), 7(7) and 7(7A); Central excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A(4); Central Excise Rules - Rule 96ZO(3); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3(1)
[2006]148STC356(All)
R.K.S. Chauhan and; Navin Sinha, Advs.
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. Disagreeing and also doubting the correctness of the law laid down by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Jaya Bhatta Udyog v. State of U.P. (Civil Misc. Writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Stone Product and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-21-2009
Commercial
AIR2010All26
Shri. Navin Sinha
1. Heard Shri Navin Sinha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Rakesh Kumar for the petitioners, Shri Govind Saran for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava for the respondent No. 4.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Jaypee Cement Limited; in Re: Jaiprakash Industries Limited
Allahabad
Mar-10-2004
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 21, 101(2), 103(2), 189, 391, 394, 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 11, 42 and 44
[2004]122CompCas854(All); (2004)2CompLJ105(All)
S.N. Verma, Sr. Adv., ;R.P. Agarwal, Adv. representing JPC and JPI, ;Navin Sinha, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Mehrotra, Adv. representing HSBL, ;Pankaj Bhatia and ;M.C. Tewari, Advs. representing shareholders and
Sushil Harkauli, J.1. Company Petition No. 26 of 2003 has been filed jointly by the transferee company, namely, Jaypee Cement Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as JPC for short) and the transferor company, namely, Jaiprakash Industries Ltd....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.S. Gupta and Sons Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-01-2005
Excise
Constitution of India - Article 226; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Central Excise Act - Sections 5A and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 5 and 151A
2005(100)ECC121; 2007(212)ELT22(All)
Navin Sinha and ;Pankaj Bhatia, Advs.
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, M/s J. S. Gupta and Sons, seek the following reliefs:'(i) issue suitable writ, Order or...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Om S/O Sri Upendra Nath Tripathi Vs. Hakim Singh S/O Late Sri Jug ...
Allahabad
Sep-24-2007
Election
2007(4)AWC4185
Sri. K.R. Singh, Sri. Navin Sinha
Pankaj Mithal, J.1. This is an appeal under Rule 49(1) of the U.P. Kshettra Samities (Election of Prakukhs and Up-Prarnukhs and Settlement of Election Disputes) Rules, 1962 (for short, the Rules) framed under the U.P. Kshettra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovind Bhawan Karyalaya Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Dec-23-2010
MRTP
Shri. Navin Sinha
1. The question of law, that requires consideration in these two Special Appeals, is as to whether the 'Variable Dearness Allowance' (VDA) in the notification dated 31.1.1992 issued under Section 4 of the Minimum of Wages...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Hotel Complex Vs. Reserve Bank of India and ors.
Patna
Jan-23-2004
Banking
Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 19 and 35A
Navin Sinha and Alok Kr. Agrawal for Durga Hotel Complex, Chitranjan Sinha and Mukund Jee for State Bank of India and Seema Ali Khan, Adv. for Reserve Bank of India
Radha Mohan Prasad, J. 1. In first writ petition, petitioner has sought for direction to the State Bank of India to carry out the directions given to it by the Banking Ombudsman in his order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »