Advanced Search Results
Mawana Sugars Limited, a Company Duly Incorporated Under the Provision ...
Allahabad
Mar-20-2006
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 12, 12(2), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16 and 16(2); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rule 22
2006(2)AWC1941
Navin Sinha and ;Yashwant Varma, Advs.
Vineet Saran, J.1. The dispute in this writ petition pertains to the 7 cane centres, namely, (i) Paharpur-II; (ii) Kunda/Pinai-II; (iii) Niloha-IV; (iv) Naglashekhu-II; (v) Navipur/Lalpur-II; (vi) Nagli Sadhararipur-II; and (vii) Incholi-III. For the current crushing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradeshia Industrial and Investment Corpn. of U.P. Ltd. Vs. State of U ...
Allahabad
Apr-23-2002
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 451 and 456
[2003]47SCL126(All)
Navin Sinha and ;Anurag Khanna, Advs.
ORDERSunil Ambwani, J.1. Pradeshia Industrial & Investment Corporation of U.P. Ltd. (hereinafter called as PICUP) has filed these Criminal Revision Nos. 41 of 2000 and 49 of 2000 against the Judgment and Order dated 20-12-1999 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India Through Its Deputy General Manager Vs. Union of In ...
Allahabad
Aug-18-2005
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 33C(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11
2006(1)AWC299; [2006(107)FLR898]; (2006)ILLJ625All
Navin Sinha and ;Vipin Sinha, Advs.
Vineet Saran, J.1. This is the third inning of litigation between the panics, cause of action of which arose in the year' 1969.2. Brief facts of this case as admitted to the parties are that respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhadauria Gram Sewa Sansthan Vs. Asstt. Commissioner, Sales Tax, Allah ...
Allahabad
Jan-13-2006
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2(i) and 7D; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 49E; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5(1), 7(7) and 7(7A); Central excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A(4); Central Excise Rules - Rule 96ZO(3); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3(1)
[2006]148STC356(All)
R.K.S. Chauhan and; Navin Sinha, Advs.
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. Disagreeing and also doubting the correctness of the law laid down by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Jaya Bhatta Udyog v. State of U.P. (Civil Misc. Writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Jaypee Cement Limited; in Re: Jaiprakash Industries Limited
Allahabad
Mar-10-2004
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 21, 101(2), 103(2), 189, 391, 394, 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 11, 42 and 44
[2004]122CompCas854(All); (2004)2CompLJ105(All)
S.N. Verma, Sr. Adv., ;R.P. Agarwal, Adv. representing JPC and JPI, ;Navin Sinha, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Mehrotra, Adv. representing HSBL, ;Pankaj Bhatia and ;M.C. Tewari, Advs. representing shareholders and
Sushil Harkauli, J.1. Company Petition No. 26 of 2003 has been filed jointly by the transferee company, namely, Jaypee Cement Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as JPC for short) and the transferor company, namely, Jaiprakash Industries Ltd....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.S. Gupta and Sons Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-01-2005
Excise
Constitution of India - Article 226; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Central Excise Act - Sections 5A and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 5 and 151A
2005(100)ECC121; 2007(212)ELT22(All)
Navin Sinha and ;Pankaj Bhatia, Advs.
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, M/s J. S. Gupta and Sons, seek the following reliefs:'(i) issue suitable writ, Order or...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSardar Kripal Singh Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-11-1993
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Schedule - Rules 52 and 54
[1993]201ITR563(All)
Navin Sinha, Adv.
1. Heard Sri Navin Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Shekhar Srivastava, learned counsel representing the respondents.2. House Nos. 7/113, Swarup Nagar (Pritam Niwas), Kanpur, along with land appurtenant thereto, of which the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askiqbal Ahmad and ors. Vs. Abdul Quddus Ansari and ors.
Allahabad
May-23-1984
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24
AIR1984All296
Navin Sinha, Adv.
Amitabh Banerji, J.1. This revision raises a patent question of jurisdiction although the point now urged in this Court was not raised before the Court below. 2. A proceeding under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Hotel Complex Vs. Reserve Bank of India and ors.
Patna
Jan-23-2004
Banking
Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 19 and 35A
Navin Sinha and Alok Kr. Agrawal for Durga Hotel Complex, Chitranjan Sinha and Mukund Jee for State Bank of India and Seema Ali Khan, Adv. for Reserve Bank of India
Radha Mohan Prasad, J. 1. In first writ petition, petitioner has sought for direction to the State Bank of India to carry out the directions given to it by the Banking Ombudsman in his order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumitra Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Oct-28-2002
ServiceCivil
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226
Navin Sinha and Sujeet Kumar Sinha, Advs.Shailesh Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. and Binod Bihari Sinha, Adv.
Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. This writ application was earlier filed by Hira Prasad (hereinafter referred to as the writ petitioner). After his death, his legal heirs i. e. wife and other children have been substituted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »