Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: naresh kaushik · Page 1 of about 473 results (0.075 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 22 1994

Anshad and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-22-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 379, 394 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 235(2) and 354(3); Evidence Act - Sections 27

Reported in : JT1994(3)SC324; 1994(2)SCALE653; (1994)4SCC381; [1994]3SCR642

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik,; Shankar Divate and; Lalit Kaushik, Advs

A.S. Anand, J.1. These are appeals by special leave and since they arise out of the common judgment of the High Court, they are being disposed of together. 2. Raj an (A1), Shashi (A2), Anshad (A3),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2007

B.C. Deva @ Dyava Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : JT2007(9)SC558; 2007(5)KarLJ614; 2007(9)SCALE338; 2007AIRSCW4857; (2007)3Crimes281(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)2309; 2007(5)AIRKarR449(SC).

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik,; Satish Daya Nandan,; Parag Goyal and;

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. The appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 01.03.2000 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 334/96, confirming the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Sanjiv Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 174, 176 and 374; Muslim Law

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT459

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik, Adv

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. The present appeal filed under Section 374 CrPC has been directed against the judgment dated 30/1/2003 passed in Sessions Case No. 135/1997, whereby the appellant husband of the deceased was convicted under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 20 2007

Mangi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 1960

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR222]; 2007(3)SCALE458; (2007)9SCC189; 2007AIRSCW4352

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik,; Lalita Kaushik,; B.B. Methaila,;

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Appellant herein was appointed as a Surveyor on 31.08.1979. His educational qualification then was Diploma in Mining. He did his AMIE in Mining in the year 1986. He claimed promotion...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2007

Ran Singh @ Ram Singh and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 141, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 323 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3052

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik and; Bijendra Singh, Advs. in Criminal Appeal No. 640 of 2004 and;

P.K. Bhasin, J.1. In these two appeals six accused persons have challenged their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and also under Section 323 read with Section 149 IPC vide judgment dated 27-07-2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2012

Jai Chander Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Cult ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-10-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. For the Respondents: Amit Anand, Advocate.

Dr. Veena Chhotray: 1. The Applicant, working as a temporary status casual labour under the Department of Archeological Survey of India, is aggrieved at non-regularization of his services. By way of relief, the OA seeks directions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2009

The State Rep. by Cbi, Hyderabad Vs. G. Prem Raj

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-19-2009

Subject : CriminalService

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 2, 7, 11, 13(1), 13(2), 20 and 20(3)

Reported in : AIR2010SC793; JT2009(14)SC321; 2009(14)SCALE92; (2010)1SCC398; 2009(6)LHSC3932; 2009AIRSCW7290

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik,; Ranjana Narain,; P.K. Dey and;

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. In this Appeal, the judgment of the High Court, allowing the appeal of the respondent herein and acquitting him of the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) and Section 7...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2008

K.C. Palaniswamy and anr. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 133A, 201(1), 201(1A), 276B, 278B, 278B(1), 279 and 279B; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 66; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; India Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926 - Regulation 3

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Del)202; 152(2008)DLT620; 2008(106)DRJ319

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik,; Satish Dayananda and; Amita Kalkal, Ad

S. Muralidhar, J.1. In this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ( CrPC ) two of the accused persons in a criminal complaint, CC No. 444 of 2005 titled Kamal Khanna...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2011

Sh. Ravi Kumar Uppal and Others Vs. Press Council of India Through the ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-22-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Aditi Gupta and Ms. Amita Chaudhary, Advocates. For the Respondents: Ms. Meenu Mainee on behalf of Sh. A.K. Behera, Sh. Krishan Kumar, Advocates.

DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A): 1. Shri Ravi Kumar Uppal and 60 others working in the Press Council of India (PCI) have joined together and approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2012

Deepak Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-05-2012

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. For the Respondent: H.K. Gangwani, Advocate.

DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A) 1. Shri Deepak Sharma, the applicant herein, is seeking to quash and set aside the order dated 9.6.2010 (Annex.-P1) wherein the respondents refused to reconsider /review their action on his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial