Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: naina saraf · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.022 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 04 2002

Arun Singhal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-04-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(1)WLC783

Advocate for Appellant : Naina Saraf, Adv.

Madan, J.1. Though the malter was listed for on respondents' application for vacation of stay order dated 15.10.2001 but with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being decided finally since...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2001

Director Rural Development and Another Vs. Miss Jayanti

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-13-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 15

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC320; 2001(4)WLN1

Advocate for Appellant : Naina Saraf, Adv.

ORDERLakshmanan, C.J. (1) Heard counsel for the parlies at length.(2). These Special Appeals have been filed against the order dated 26.2.2001,passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1646/2000 and other connected...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2001

D.K. Chaplot Vs. Regional Manager, National Insurance Company and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-03-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 - Rules 2 and 25(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 92(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 127

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC717; 2001(3)WLN205

Advocate for Appellant : Naina Saraf, Adv.

Sharma, J. (1). The petitioner appellant hereinafter to be called as 'the petitioner') employed as a Development Officer, Branch-II with the respondent National Insurance Company and was posted in the Divisional Office at Udaipur. He was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 22 2005

Surendra Bhatia Vs. Poonam Bhatia and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-22-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 5, 5(2), 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 371 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 8, 29A and 29B; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR2006Raj128; I(2006)DMC667; RLW2006(1)Raj612; 2006(1)WLC648

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Bhandari, Sr. Adv.,; Rizwan Ali and Naina Saraf, Advs.

V.K. Bali, J. 1. Sudarshan Bhatia, born and brought up in the State of Rajas-than, but stated to be a Canadian citizen, died on 21.4.1989 in Germany leaving behind considerable movable and immovable properties. Poonam Bhati...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2005

Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-22-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 - Rules 2 and 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 360; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 294, 341 and 509

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj770

Advocate for Appellant : Naina Sarraf, Adv.

Shiv kumar Sharma, J.1. The appellant, who was a Constable, placed on trial before learned Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Jaipur City for having hurled obscene words at a young girl Laxmi. Finding those words offensive to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2002

Vikas Soni Vs. Malaviya Regional Engineering College

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-09-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 12; Rajasthan General Clauses Act, 1955 - Sections 32(74)

Reported in : AIR2003Raj158; 2003(1)WLC793

Advocate for Appellant : Abhay Bhandari, Sr. Adv. and; C.L. Saini, Adv.

ORDERK.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioner applied for admission in Engineering Colleges of Rajasthan and Rajasthan seats of other regional engineering colleges. The petitioner submitted this form in the category of 'children of defence personnel killed' and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2003

Mohd. Hanif and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-14-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120A and 120B

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1704; 2004(1)WLC560

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv.,; V.P. Bisnoi,; N.A. Naqvi,;

Khem Chand Sharma, J.1. Since these two, appeals arise out of the judgment in Sessions case No. 10/94, therefore, both the appeals are being decided by a common judgment.2. The aforementioned two appears under Section 374...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2006

R.S.R.T.C. Vs. Lekhraj Bansal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2006)ACC60; 2006WLC(Raj)UC654

ORDERR.S. Chauhan, J.1. The unfortunate death of Deepak Bansal in an accident, an award of Rs. 3,28,305 has not deterred the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (henceforth to be referred to as the RSRTC, for short)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2006

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lekhraj Bansal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2007ACJ2270

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The unfortunate death of Deepak Bansal in an accident, an award of Rs. 3,28,305 has not deterred the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (henceforth to be referred to as 'the R.S.R.T.C for short)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2001

Smt. Pushplata Thada and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-26-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC560; 2007(3)WLN435

AR. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. These writ petitions raised a common question, as such, by consent of both the parties all the writ petitions were taken up for final hearing and are being decided by this common order.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial