Advanced Search Results

Satish Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mysore Government Servants Seniority Rules - Rule 6-A

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC661

A.S. Anand and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. Heard on merits.3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties we are satisfied that no interference with the Tribunal's order is called for insofar as it relates to...

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Railways, Mangalore Vs. Narayana ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquistion Act, 1894 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1973Kant25; AIR1973Mys25

Advocate for Appellant : N. Venkatachala, High Court Govt. Pleader

Venkataswami, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 54 of the LandAcquisition Act, and directed against an order made by the Second Additional Civil Judge, Mangalore, in O. P. No. 814 of 1966, dated 21-1-1969.2. The...

The State of Mysore and ors. Vs. Tarachand Venkatachand Shaha and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 70; Constitution of India - Article 299(1)

Reported in : AIR1973Kant333; AIR1973Mys333; (1973)2MysLJ9

Advocate for Appellant : N. Venkatachala, II Addl. Govt. Adv.

Venkataramiah, J.1. This appeal is filed against the decree passed in Special Suit No. 14 of 1967 on the file of the Civil Judge. Bagalkot. The said suit was originally instituted as Original Suit No. 17...

Vinodanand Yadav and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC44

A.M. Ahmadi,; K. Ramaswamy and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. The appellants were directly recruited as Assistant Engineers (Mechanical) in the Public Health Engineering Department of the State of Bihar. The contesting respondents were initially appointed as Engineering...

Mahendra Raj Marg Karamchari Union and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 32

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC511; 1995(2)LC294(SC)

K. Ramaswamy and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. These petitions are disposed of by a common order since the questions raised are the same. Pursuant to a bilateral agreement between the Government of India and the Government of...

Ravinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 5, 5(1)

Reported in : 1995Supp(1)SCC594

K. Ramaswamy and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel on both sides. The Municipal Committee, Nurmahal, District Jullundur in the State of Punjab, by a resolution dated 24-12-1984, decided to extend...

Prabhu Prasad Sinha Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC43

A.M. Ahmadi,; K. Ramaswamy and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. The appellant was appointed as Engineer Assistant on January 19, 1967 by the Executive Engineer of the concerned Division. Subsequently, by an order dated February 17, 1968 he...

P. Nageswara Rao and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor VehiclesOther Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act (Amendment Act 11 of 1992) - Section 3

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC693

K. Ramaswamy and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel. These appeals arise from the common judgment dated 30-7-1993 of a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 6901 and...

Anand G. Joshi Vs. Maharashtra State Financial Corporation and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995Supp(1)SCC186

A.M. Ahmadi,; M.M. Punchhi and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the applicant rightly contends that in view of the order dated November 25, 1991 the management...

Dr Damodar Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC51

A.M. Ahmadi and; N. Venkatachala, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. Heard counsel on both sides.3. We are afraid the impugned order of the Tribunal cannot be sustained. The facts clearly reveal that against the order of transfer...