Advanced Search Results

M.A.A. Raoof Vs. K.G. Lakshmipathi

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 46, 46(1) and 46(2)

Reported in : AIR1969Mad268

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Subramaniam, Adv.

Venkataraman, J. 1. This appeal raises an interesting question of the validity of attachment of certain shares belonging to the judgment-debtor. The decree-holder Lakshmipathi obtained a decree in O. S. No. 2344 of 1960, on the...

Mar Appraem Kuri Company Ltd. Vs. Tomy and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 4

Reported in : [1999]96CompCas718(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : N. Subramaniam and; M.S. Narayanan, Advs.

S. Marimuthu, J. 1. This appeal is directed questioning the judgment and decree delivered by the Additional Sub-Judge, N. Paravur, in O. S. No. 612 of 1993, dated August 31, 1994. The plaintiff is the appellant....

V. Gopalakrishna Vs. the Secretary, Board of Revenue, Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1954Mad362; (1953)1MLJ744

Advocate for Appellant : N. Subramaniam and ;M. Ramakrishna, Advs.

ORDERVenkatarama Aiyar, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash the notification of the Government of Madras dated 22-1-1953 under Section 6...

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13 OF2015Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record - Association and another … Petitioner(s) versus Union of India … Respondent(s) With |WRIT PETITION (C) No.14 OF2015| |WRIT...

Tiny Vs. Jacky

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Jijo Paul

Can a plaint be quashed under Art.226 or Art.227 of the Constitution? This important question arises for consideration in this petition. 2. This petition is filed, mainly, on the following averments: In 1962, petitioner’s father had...

The Kerala State Electricity Board Limited, vs Anilkumar P.J.

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 WA.No.1226 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED...

Ongc Ltd. Vs. Petroleum Coal Labour Union and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3727 OF2015(Arising out of SLP (C) No.5532 of 2012) ONGC LTD. ....APPELLANT VERSUS PETROLEUM COAL LABOUR UNION & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V. GOPALA GOWDA,...

R.Thiagarajan Vs. State of Tamilnadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Recruitment Rules - Article 309

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.MA.Gouthaman; Mr.M.Muthappan, Advs.

Prayer in W.P.No.7006 of 2011: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records of the respondents in G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (salary section) Department dated 26.2.2011 as...

Dennis M.Paul Vs. M.John Alias Saju

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 25TH POUSHA 193 OP(C).No. 4011 of 2012 (O) -------------------------- IA NO.5688/2012 IN OS.963/2010 OF III...

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman, Senior Adv., ;I.M. Chagla, ;Aspi Chinoy and ;J.P. Avasia, Advs., i/b., ;Bachibai Munim and Co. in Suit No. 3910 of 1997

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. The notices of motion in Suit No. 3910 of 1997 seek to challenge the legality and validity of substantial acquisitions of shares by defendants Nos. 1 to 11 in defendant No. 12-company allegedly...