Advanced Search Results

Shri Daniel Vs. State and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397; Goa, Daman and Diu Kerosene Oil (Export and Price) Control, Order, 1975 - Sections 4; Kerosen (Fixation of Ceiling Prices) Order, 1970

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR493; 1999BomCR(Cri)493

Advocate for Appellant : N. Sardessai, Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. This Criminal Revision Application arises from order dated 29th August, 1998, passed in Special Criminal Case No. 1/94 by the District and Sessions Judge, Panaji. By the impugned Order, the learned Sessions Judge...

Mrs. Ana Colaco Vs. Thomas Colaco

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 15, ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1997(3)BomCR305

Advocate for Appellant : N. Sardessai, Adv.

R.K. Batta, J.1. The petitioner (plaintiff in the suit) had claimed in the suit filed by her that there existed traditional passage from her house through the property of respondent (defendant in the suit) to go...

M/S Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Balaji Logistics Carr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sardessai

In both these matters the parties are the same and the issues are interconnected. Therefore, both the matters are taken up and being disposed of by common judgment. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties....

ing Vysa Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. State Represented by ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Oral Judgment: Rule returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties the petition is taken up on board for hearing. 2. Heard Shri N. Sardessai, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri M. Amonkar, the learned...

Menino Jose Rodrigues Vs. Labour Court, Government of Goa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Goa Daman Diu Shops and Establishments Act, 1973 - Sections 39

Reported in : [1999(82)FLR758]; (2001)IIILLJ521Bom

R.K. Batta, J.1. The short question for determination in this writ petition is whether the gratuity payable to an employee under Section 39 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Shops and Establishments Act, 1973 (hereinafter called...

Hanumant Nagvekar S/O Laldu Nagvekar Vs. State (Through Margao Police ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR741a

N.A. Britto, J.1. This revision is filed by the accused in Criminal Case No. 42/S/2002.2. There is no dispute that the accused was the driver of the KTC Bus No. GA-01-X0062 which met with an accident...

Aspaq N. Ahmed Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 313

Reported in : 2006(3)MhLj874

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. D'Souza, Adv.

N.A. Britto, J.1. The appellant herein is accused who has been convicted and sentenced by the learned Special Judge, Mapusa in Special Criminal Case No. 9/2003 under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Anti Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic...

Sangayya Panchkatti Matt Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2006)ACC52

V.M. Kanade, J.1. The appellant/original accused is challenging the judgment and order passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 7 of 2002. By the said judgment and order dated 25th May,...

Gangadhar Narsingdas Agrawal and Others Vs. Ministry of Environment an ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. Sardessai

A.P. Lavande, J. Heard Mr. D. Khambatta, Mr. D. Mehta, Mr. N. Sardessai, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. C. A. Ferreira, learned Asst. Solicitor General and Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, learned Advocate General...

Nilconta Gangadhar Sinai Amonkar, S/O Late Gangadhar Amonkar Vs. Vivek ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: Heard Shri Nitin Sardessai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri P. A. Kamat, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Rule. Heard forthwith by consent of the learned Counsel. 3. The learned...