Advanced Search Results

Malay Ganguly Vs. Medical Council of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

Reported in : 2003(10)SCALE361; (2002)10SCC93

B.N. Kirpal,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Ashok Bhan, JJ.Mr. Maninder Singh, counsel for Respondent 1 has drawn our attention to some of the salient provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956It may be desirable that...

Sharma Coal Co. Vs. Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : (2002)10SCC652

S.P. Bharucha,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.CA No. 3997 of 1999We have heard learned counsel and are of the view that the matter must stand remanded to the U.P. Trade Tax Tribunal to determine...

C.M. Iqbal Vs. Vijaya Alias Geetha

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3)

Reported in : ILR1989KAR3432; 1990(1)KarLJ59

Advocate for Appellant : N. Santosh Hegde, Adv.

ORDERRamachandriah, J.1. This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') is directed against the order dated 21-7-89 of the M.M.V. Court, Bangalore (for short 'the Magistrate')...

Bhujanga Hegde and anr. Vs. Sakarama Hegde and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1971Kant208; AIR1971Mys208; (1971)1MysLJ81

Advocate for Appellant : N. Santosh Hegde, Adv.

ORDERB. Venataswami, J. 1. This petition under Section 115, Civil Procedure Code has been Preferred by defendants 3 and 4, in Original Suit No. 6 of 1966, on the file of the Civil Judge, at Udipi....

Mohammad Tahair Vs. Syed Khaja Ali and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53-A; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 47(1)

Reported in : AIR1973Kant307; AIR1973Mys307; (1973)2MysLJ94

Advocate for Appellant : N. Santosh Hegde and ;A.M. Farooq, Advs.

Venkataswami, J.1. This is a defendant's appeal under Section 96 of the C. P. Code. The suit in question was O. S. No. 72 of 1968 on the file of the Civil Judge at Bidar. The...

Hemant Baburao Patil Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.K. Sharma; Mr. Ashutosh Dubey; Ms.Bhanita Patowary, Advs.

1. The petitioner No.1, President of National Anti Corruption Public Power, a registered association and an NGO and the association, the petitioner No.2 herein, have preferred this public interest writ petition with the following reliefs: "(a)...

Sanjay Krishnanath Phatte Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1999)9SCC239

S.Saghir Ahmed and; N. Santosh Hegde, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. On one post of Senior Auditor, appointment was to be made from the category of Ex-servicemen for which the appellant as also Respondent 5 had applied. In...

Arjun Das Vs. Rampyari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2000)10SCC61

S.P. Bharucha and; N. Santosh Hegde, JJ.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there are three options under the law for punishing a man who has violated the law as here. He also submits that...

Praveen Kumar and ors. Vs. Suresh Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2000)8SCC491

 A.P. Mishra and; N. Santosh Hegde, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. The appellants filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code for setting aside the ex parte...

National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra South) Ltd. Vs. Standard Cha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : JT2000(10)SC309; (2000)10SCC592

A.P. Mishra and; N. Santosh Hegde, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner is a subsidiary of National Textile Corporation and Respondent 1 is the landlord of the suit premises. Respondent 2 is the...