Advanced Search Results

Shri Jai Prakash Vs. Smt. Ram Roshni

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 127, 125; Hindu Marriage Act - Section 24

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. S. Dahiya, Adv.

1. This is a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 30.11.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka, in M. No. 171/2009 under Section 127 Cr.P.C. in case titled...

Madras Metropolitan Development Authority Vs. Sears Electronics Limite ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act; Original Side Rules - Order 4, Rule 1

Reported in : [2005]128CompCas545(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : N. Sampath, Adv.

A.K. Rajan, J.1. Suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 62,94,520.50 with further interest on Rs. 50,00,000 from March 16, 1993, till the date of realisation.2. The plaint averments are as follows : The plaintiff...

Venkatesh @ Seena Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395

Reported in : ILR1993KAR1218; 1992(2)KarLJ16

Advocate for Appellant : N. Sampath Kumar, Adv.

R. Ramakrishna, J.1. The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No. 17 of 1988 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur. Four other persons were arraigned as Accused Nos.2 to 5. The...

Tata Tea Limited, Velonie Estate Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Represent ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 2(3), 3, 4, 25A, 25A(1), 25A(2), 25K, 25K(2) and 25L(3); ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 1(3), 2, 9, 20, 25A(1), 25B, 25B(1), 25B(2), 25F, 25FFF, 25T, 25U and 30; ;Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act - 1953; ;Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to workmen) Act, 1981 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5(1), 5(3), 9, 18(1), 32 and 36; ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; ;Payment of Gratuity Act - Section 2 and 2A; ;Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Fund Act; ;Tamil Nadu Plantations Labour Rules, 1985 - Rules 6(4) and 69; ;Constitution of India - Articles 42 and 226

Advocate for Appellant : E.K. Nandakumar and; P. Vijayan, Advs. for; King and Pat

ORDERK. Chandru, J.I. History of indentured Labour:1.1. Tea gardens like other industrial establishments must depend on offering sufficient attractions in order to maintain their labour force. The emigrant must be convinced that Assam holds out the...

M. Ramakrishnan, Area Secretary, Communist Party of India (Marxist), C ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the concerned records relating to the order bearing G.O.Ms.No.113 dated 3.9.2015 (Ex-A) passed by...

R.Mahalakshmi vs the Tahsildar

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 9482 of 20251. R.Mahalakshmi 2.N.T.Ravi Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Tahsildar Kalavai Taluk, Ranipettai District. 2.The District Collector, Ranipettai District. Respondent(s)...

R.Mahalakshmi vs the Assistant Engineer

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA and W.M.P. No.13710 of 2025 in W.P. No.12137 of 2025 1.R.Mahalakshmi 2.N.T.Ravi ... Petitioners Vs. The Assistant Engineer,...

R.Sathyavel Vs. Kanniammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :11. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU Contempt Petition No.1171 of 2008 R.Sathyavel .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Kanniammal, President, Machanur Village Panchayat, Machanur Village & Post, Katpadi Taluk,...

S. Janaki and Another Vs. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Na ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writs of Mandamus (i) prohibiting the respondents and their subordinate officials from in any manner utilizing or claiming any right over...

S.Lingamurthy Vs The Joint Commissioner

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.Lingamurthy Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Joint CommissionerNandanam, Chennai 600035. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the 3rd respondent...