Advanced Search Results

Harbans Kaur and ors. Vs. Bhola Nath and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act - Sections 65

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)272; 57(1995)DLT101; 1995(32)DRJ262

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Sistani,; G.S. Sistani and; Bharati Patni, Advs

Mohd. Sharnim, J. (1) The appellants/defendants (hereinafter referred to as the appellants for the sake of convenience) have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order passed by the first appellate court dated September 1,1973 whereby...

Delhi Development Authority Vs. H. Dohil Construction Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 53B(2)

Reported in : ILR1984Delhi710; 1984RLR585

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Sistani,; Swantantar Kumar and; Geeta Mittal, Advs

Avadh Behari Rohtagi, J. (1) (ORAL) This is an appeal from the. decree of a learned single judge of this Court dated F 17-11-1982. The plaintiff-respondent M/s. H. Dohil Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. (the purchaser) instated...

Skytone Electricals (India) Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : ILR1982Delhi788

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Sistani,; B.S. Parthyal and ; N.K. Jaggi, Advs

G.C. Jain, J.(1) Messrs Skytone Electricals (India) Faridabad, is a partnership firm carrying on business for the manufacture of electrical goods and other allied articles. They entered into a contrect No ES-3/BULK/33/III/Skytone/1026 Paod, dated January 18,...

Anand Builoers and Anr. Vs. Driplex Water Engineerin'g (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5

Reported in : ILR1982Delhi269

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Sistani and; R.P. Kapur, Advs

Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J. (1) This is an application under sections 5 and Ii of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (the Act) for the removal of the sole arbitrator Shri S. N. Mukherjee. (2) On an application...

Madan M. Behl Vs. National Small Scale Industries Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1971CriLJ1378

ORDERPritam Singh Safeer, J.1. This a petition preferred Under Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It was on the 17th of March 1971, that I disposed of Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) No. 136 of 1970.2....

Delhi Development Authority and ors. Vs. Alkarma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1985Delhi132; 1984RLR693

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Sistani,; G.S. Sistani and; Rishikesh, Advs

B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) (ORAL). The two questions which arise for consideration in this First Appeal are (1) Whether the Engineer-Member of the appellant No. 1 can be directed to appoint an arbitrator and to refer...

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Uppal Engineering Construction Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi425; 21(1982)DLT457; ILR1982Delhi713

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Sistani and; R.L. Pal, Advs

Leila Seth, J.(1) The short point in issue in this appeal is the seope of seruitiny of a speaking award. Does the fact that the arbitrator has given a speaking award enlarge the function of the...

Lakshmi Chand Vs. Iqbal Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act - Sections 17

Reported in : 1975RLR67

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Sehgal and; N.S. Sistani, Advs

Yogeshwar Dayal, J. (1) Parties jointly bought two houes. One was in front and the other on the back. Entrance to the back was from the front house. For partition they wrote a deed marked 'A'....

Heminder Singh Bisht Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957

Reported in : 1985RLR444

Advocate for Appellant : K.L. Budhiraja,; R.K. Saini,; N.S. Sistani and;

Kirpal, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of 2 petitions being C.W. No. 225/85 and Cw 551/85 wherein the challenge is to the non-implementation of a panel which is stated to have been prepared by the respondent...

Punjab and Sindh Bank Vs. Vinkar Sahakari Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4, 5, 17, 50, 85A, 118, 131, 131A, 138 and 142; Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 60 and 82

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)537; AIR2001SC3641; 2001(4)ALLMR(SC)474; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)55; [2001]107CompCas208(SC); (2001)4CompLJ188(SC); 2002CriLJ93; JT2001(8)SC22; 2001MPLJ580(SC); RLW2001

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Sistani, Sr. Adv.,; G.S. Sistani,; Arun K. Sinha an

Thomas, J.1. Leave granted.2.This case involves a queer situation when a 'Pay Order' was dishonoured by the drawer bank. The holder thereof (Punjab and Sindh Bank) filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...