Advanced Search Results
Lakhani Sahakari Shetki Kharedi Vikri Sanstha Ltd. Vs. Moreshwar Bapu
Mumbai
Jul-22-1977
Trusts and Societies
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 91, 91(1), 91(2), 93(3) and 154; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182; Maharashtra Scheduled Foodgrains (Stocks Declaration and Procurement and Disposal Acquisition, Transport and Price Control) Order, 1966; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91
AIR1978Bom273; (1979)81BOMLR129; 1978MhLJ59
N.S. Munshi, Adv.
Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioner, Lakhani Sahakari Shetki Kharedi Vikri Sanstha, Limited at Lakhani, which is a registered Co-operative Society, has challenged in this writ petition the order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnabai and ors. Vs. Baburao and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-20-1977
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 6(1), 8, 8(3), 36, 38 and 100(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 106
AIR1978Bom290; (1978)80BOMLR582; 1978MhLJ85
N.S. Munshi, Adv.
1. The short and interesting question that arises in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioners' contention that the respondents and their predecessor-in-title by name Ashru were the tenants, is barred on account of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPyase Saheb Gulsar Chhotumiya Sawasi Etc. Vs. Dashrath Wasudeo Daff an ...
Mumbai
Jun-25-1976
Election
City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 15, 16, 63, 348, 348(6), 348(7), 348(8), 420(3), 428, 428(1) and 428(2); Representation of the People Act
AIR1977Bom91; 1977MhLJ246
N.S. Munshi , Adv. in S.C.A. No. 1253 of 1976 and ;H.S. Ghare, Adv. in S.C.A. No. 1337 of 1976
Masodkab, J.1. Both these petitions arise out of the election proceedings filed by the respondent No. 1 before the District Judge, Nagpur under Section 428 of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hanifabi Vs. Kamal and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-01-1977
Election
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Sections 14, 15(1) and 15(2); Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 15; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 37 and 82; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 31; Bombay Village Panchayats Election Rules, 1959 - Rules 8, 10, 11, 12(4), 13, 14, 43 and 47; Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 19
AIR1978Bom283; 1977MhLJ673
N.S. Munshi, Adv.
Kambli, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated 13-9-1972 passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Washim, setting aside the election of Ward No. 4 of the Malegaon Gram Panchayat held on 25-5-1970, including the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskReserve Bank Employees Association, Nagpur Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...
Mumbai
Apr-04-1968
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 350 and 439; Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Code, 1955 - Sections 263 and 264
AIR1969Bom199; (1969)71BOMLR99; 1969CriLJ711; ILR1969Bom804; 1968MhLJ725
N.S. Munshi, Adv.
ORDER1. The present applicant who was complainant has lodged this application under S. 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure to review my judgment dated 25th April 1967 passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 31 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRameshwar Bhuralal Sharma Vs. Vithal Sukhdeo Rathod and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-01-1974
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 36, 36(1), 36(2) and 124; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 54
AIR1975Bom160; 1975MhLJ107
N.S. Munshi, Adv.
ORDER1. Petitioner Rameshwar purchased an area of 2 acres 36 gunthas out of survey number 162/3 situated at village Nandura vide sale-deed dated 9-12-1954 from Ramkrishna Dattatraya, who, along with (1) Vasant (2) Ramkrishna (3) Mangabai...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinayakrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra Thorough Its Secretary, Revenu ...
Mumbai
Mar-19-1975
Property
Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 - Sections 9, 9(1) and 31; Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1959 - Rule 27
AIR1976Bom10; 1975MhLJ566
N.S. Munshi and ;V.G. Senad, Advs.
Shimpi, J. 1. Petitioner by this special Civil application prays that the order dated 27-1-1969 passed by the Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur, in a revision application filed by the petitioner dismissing his petition whereby he confirmed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDagadu Vs. Ramji and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-06-1979
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 23, 41, 43, 46, 48, 49-A, 49-B, 91, 97, 97(2), 98, 100, 100(2), 101, 102 and 125; Constitution of India - Article 227; Mamlatadar's Courts Act, 1906 - Sections 7 and 36
AIR1981Bom323; 1980MhLJ472
N.S. Munshi, Adv.
ORDER1. The material question that arises for consideration in this petition is whether the Agricultural Lands Tribunal while exercising the powers conferred upon it by Section 98 of the (hereinafter referred to as the Vidarbha Tenancy...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKundlik Tukaram Fatangale Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-03-1976
Property
Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 6 and 12; Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946; Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages (Amendment) Act, 1955
AIR1977Bom83; 1976MhLJ825
N.S. Munshi, Adv.
ORDER1. The only point that arises for determination in this petition is regarding the number of members in the family falling under the definition of 'family unit' as given under Section 4 (1) of the Maharashtra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagpalsingh Sajjansingh Vs. Digamber Tulsiram and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-13-1968
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 38, 38(7), 107, 107(2), 111, 111(1), 111(2) and 114; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Bombay Revenue Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1959 - Rules 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(4), 9(5), 9(7), 11, 11(6), 13, 25, 45 and 47(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 12; Bombay Revenue Tribunals Act
AIR1970Bom122; (1969)71BOMLR545; ILR1970Bom592; 1969MhLJ347
S.V. Natu and ;N.S. Munshi, Advs.
ORDER1. The petitioner, who is the landholder, invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, challenging an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal holding that his revision application against the order of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »