Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n s munshi · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 22 1977

Lakhani Sahakari Shetki Kharedi Vikri Sanstha Ltd. Vs. Moreshwar Bapu

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-22-1977

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 91, 91(1), 91(2), 93(3) and 154; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182; Maharashtra Scheduled Foodgrains (Stocks Declaration and Procurement and Disposal Acquisition, Transport and Price Control) Order, 1966; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91

Reported in : AIR1978Bom273; (1979)81BOMLR129; 1978MhLJ59

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi, Adv.

Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioner, Lakhani Sahakari Shetki Kharedi Vikri Sanstha, Limited at Lakhani, which is a registered Co-operative Society, has challenged in this writ petition the order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1977

Krishnabai and ors. Vs. Baburao and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-20-1977

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 6(1), 8, 8(3), 36, 38 and 100(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 106

Reported in : AIR1978Bom290; (1978)80BOMLR582; 1978MhLJ85

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi, Adv.

1. The short and interesting question that arises in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioners' contention that the respondents and their predecessor-in-title by name Ashru were the tenants, is barred on account of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1976

Pyase Saheb Gulsar Chhotumiya Sawasi Etc. Vs. Dashrath Wasudeo Daff an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-1976

Subject : Election

Acts : City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 15, 16, 63, 348, 348(6), 348(7), 348(8), 420(3), 428, 428(1) and 428(2); Representation of the People Act

Reported in : AIR1977Bom91; 1977MhLJ246

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi , Adv. in S.C.A. No. 1253 of 1976 and ;H.S. Ghare, Adv. in S.C.A. No. 1337 of 1976

Masodkab, J.1. Both these petitions arise out of the election proceedings filed by the respondent No. 1 before the District Judge, Nagpur under Section 428 of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 01 1977

Hanifabi Vs. Kamal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-01-1977

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Sections 14, 15(1) and 15(2); Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 15; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 37 and 82; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 31; Bombay Village Panchayats Election Rules, 1959 - Rules 8, 10, 11, 12(4), 13, 14, 43 and 47; Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1978Bom283; 1977MhLJ673

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi, Adv.

Kambli, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated 13-9-1972 passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Washim, setting aside the election of Ward No. 4 of the Malegaon Gram Panchayat held on 25-5-1970, including the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1968

Reserve Bank Employees Association, Nagpur Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-1968

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 350 and 439; Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Code, 1955 - Sections 263 and 264

Reported in : AIR1969Bom199; (1969)71BOMLR99; 1969CriLJ711; ILR1969Bom804; 1968MhLJ725

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi, Adv.

ORDER1. The present applicant who was complainant has lodged this application under S. 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure to review my judgment dated 25th April 1967 passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 31 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1974

Rameshwar Bhuralal Sharma Vs. Vithal Sukhdeo Rathod and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-1974

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 36, 36(1), 36(2) and 124; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 54

Reported in : AIR1975Bom160; 1975MhLJ107

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi, Adv.

ORDER1. Petitioner Rameshwar purchased an area of 2 acres 36 gunthas out of survey number 162/3 situated at village Nandura vide sale-deed dated 9-12-1954 from Ramkrishna Dattatraya, who, along with (1) Vasant (2) Ramkrishna (3) Mangabai...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1975

Vinayakrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra Thorough Its Secretary, Revenu ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-19-1975

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 - Sections 9, 9(1) and 31; Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1959 - Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1976Bom10; 1975MhLJ566

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi and ;V.G. Senad, Advs.

Shimpi, J. 1. Petitioner by this special Civil application prays that the order dated 27-1-1969 passed by the Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur, in a revision application filed by the petitioner dismissing his petition whereby he confirmed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1979

Dagadu Vs. Ramji and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-06-1979

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 23, 41, 43, 46, 48, 49-A, 49-B, 91, 97, 97(2), 98, 100, 100(2), 101, 102 and 125; Constitution of India - Article 227; Mamlatadar's Courts Act, 1906 - Sections 7 and 36

Reported in : AIR1981Bom323; 1980MhLJ472

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi, Adv.

ORDER1. The material question that arises for consideration in this petition is whether the Agricultural Lands Tribunal while exercising the powers conferred upon it by Section 98 of the (hereinafter referred to as the Vidarbha Tenancy...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1976

Kundlik Tukaram Fatangale Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-1976

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 6 and 12; Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946; Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages (Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1977Bom83; 1976MhLJ825

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Munshi, Adv.

ORDER1. The only point that arises for determination in this petition is regarding the number of members in the family falling under the definition of 'family unit' as given under Section 4 (1) of the Maharashtra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1968

Jagpalsingh Sajjansingh Vs. Digamber Tulsiram and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-13-1968

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 38, 38(7), 107, 107(2), 111, 111(1), 111(2) and 114; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Bombay Revenue Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1959 - Rules 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(4), 9(5), 9(7), 11, 11(6), 13, 25, 45 and 47(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 12; Bombay Revenue Tribunals Act

Reported in : AIR1970Bom122; (1969)71BOMLR545; ILR1970Bom592; 1969MhLJ347

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Natu and ;N.S. Munshi, Advs.

ORDER1. The petitioner, who is the landholder, invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, challenging an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal holding that his revision application against the order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial