Advanced Search Results
State Bank of India Stressed Assets Resolution Center (Sarc) and Anoth ...
DRAT Madras
Oct-22-2008
Land Acquisition
M/s. V.R. Gopalrathnam and S. Sethuraman, M/s. S. Natarajan, M/s. N.S. Manoharan and I. Lakshmana Shankar, M/s. C.T. Selvam, Kavitha Ashok and Vijayakumar Subramaniam, M/s. P.R. Balasubramaniam and V.
1. This Appeal is preferred by the Appellant Banks challenging the impugned Order passed by the DRT, Bangalore, in OA-939/1997 dated 31.1.2007, with regard to the personal liability of the Respondents 2, and 7 to 9...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Nagalingam Manthirisaba Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai
Mar-31-2015
Land Acquisition
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD).Nos.4235 of 2015 W.P.(MD).Nos.2036, 4720 and 4707 of 2015 and M.P.(Md.Nos.2, 2 & 3, 2 and 3 of 2015 W.P.(MD).No.4235 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.Venkatachalapathy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Chennai
Sep-27-1985
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Sections 4(l), 5A and 17(4)
AIR1986Mad309
N.S. Manoharan, Adv.
ORDER1. The challenge is of a notification under S. 4(l) of the Land Acquisition Act I of 1894, hereinafter referred to as the' Act'. The power of dispensing with the provisions of S. 5A of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.S. Kamakshi Chetty, Vs. the Commissioner, Aruppukottai Municipality ...
Chennai
Feb-05-2008
PropertyCivil
Madras Town Planning Act, 1920 - Sections 14 and 14(3); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 25(2), 26, 27, 27(1), 34, 35, 36, 37(2), 38 and 125; Tamil Nadu Town Planning Act, 1928
(2008)2MLJ184
N.S. Manoharan, Adv.
ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. The writ petition is filed challenging the order of the first respondent dated 09.01.2003, by which the representation of the petitioners to allot the 'open space', came to be rejected with direction to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.A. Ameerajan Sahib Vs. Deputy Collector of Central Excise
Chennai
Sep-30-1991
Excise
1992(58)ELT528(Mad)
Shri T. Chengalvarayan,; Sr. Counsel for Shri N.S. Manoharan
ORDER1. The petitioner is a dealer in tobacco liable to pay central excise duty. His place of duty was inspected and it was found that certain quantity of tobacco had been unauthorisedly removed. A show cause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Lakshmi Vs. K. Seethapathy, Technician, Baggage and Shipping Plant ...
Chennai
Dec-03-1997
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)
1997(3)CTC718
N.S. Manoharan, Adv.
ORDERK. Govindarajan, J.1. The respondent/husband filed O.P. No. 48 of 1982 on the file of the learned VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, seeking a decree for divorce under Section 13(l)(i-a) and 13(l)(i-b) of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Gandhi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Chennai
Jul-10-2007
Sales Tax/VAT
Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 255, 301, 302, 303, 303(1), 303(2) and 304
(2008)13VST390(Mad)
R. Gandhi, Sr. Counsel for ;R.G. Narendhiran, Adv., ;K.M. Vijayan, Sr. Counsel for ;La Law, ;N.S. Manoharan, ;V. Srinivasa Balu, ;T.S. Sivagnanam, ;K.K. Senthilvelan, ;G. Vijay Anand, ;P. Suseela Rani
ORDERA.P. Shah, C.J.1. All these writ petitions filed by the importers/dealers of motor vehicles challenge the constitutional validity of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 (Act 13 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Murugesan Vs. V. Vijay Sai,
Chennai
Oct-25-2006
CivilProperty
Evidence Act - Sections 73; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 - Order 8, Rule 6, 6A, 6B, 6C and 6E
2006(5)CTC560
N.S. Manoharan, Adv.
A. Kulasekaran, J.1. The Plaintiff, who lost his case before both the courts below, is the appellant in this second appeal. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are arrayed as they were arrayed in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Zubida Begum and Others Vs. Indian Bank Rep by Its Manager Guidy B ...
Chennai
Aug-28-2012
Land Acquisition
For the Appearing Parties: S. Sethuraman, K.M. Vijayan, Senior Counsel, E. Vijay Anand, S. Ramesh, P. Raghunathan, Jayesh Dolia, M/s. Aiyer and Dolia, S. Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel, M/s. N. S. Manoharan, N.V. Srinivasan, Advocates, M/s. N.V.S. Associat
(Prayer in W.P.No.15386 of 2012: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the Appellate Tribunal, Chennai to dispose of I.A.No.1378 of 2009 in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›