Advanced Search Results

Suraj Parkash Katal Vs. Santosh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10 and 26; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 15(1979)DLT30

Advocate for Appellant : N.S.D. Behl and; J.N. Aggarwal, Advs

S.S. Chadha, J.(1) Shrimati Santosh (the wife) brought a petition on 6th April, 1976 under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for judicial separation against Shri Suraj Parkash...

New India Traders and ors. Vs. Satish Swarup Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 35(1988)DLT229

Advocate for Appellant : N.S.D. Behl,; P.K. Behl and; R.B. Gupta, Advs

Sunanda Bhandare, J. (1) The respondent-landlord filed a petition for eviction on 27th March 1981 in the court of Additional Rent Controller, Delhi against the appellants under Section 14(l)(b) and (k) of the Delhi Rent Control...

Bhalla Vs. R.N. Aggarwal, District Judge, Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 97; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 15 and 15(4); Delhi Municipal Corporation (Election of Councillors) Rules, 1962 - Rules 80 and 81

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi359

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Marwah,; N.S.D. Behl and; Sat Pal, Advs

Prakash Narain, J.(1) A municipal election took place in 1971 for election of Councillors to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The petitioner herein and respondents 2 to 7 filed nomination papers for alectioa as Councillors for...

Ramesh Chand Vs. Daljit Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1992ACJ991; 48(1992)DLT338; 1992(22)DRJ617; 1992RLR138

Advocate for Appellant : N.S.D. Behl,; Rakesh Aggarwal and; G.K. Sharma, Advs

Gokal Chand Mital, C.J. (1) The appellant was a pedestrian and was run over by a three- wheeler scooter. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held that in view of the report made in the Daily Diary...