Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n pandey · Page 1 of about 526 results (0.108 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 09 1999

Ram Briksh Maurya Vs. Murlidhar Mishra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-09-1999

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27; Uttar Pradesh Secondary, Education Service Commission Rules, 1983 - Rule 4(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1999)1UPLBEC706

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Pandey and ;A.K. Yog, Advs.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. This Special Appeal has been preferred by respondent No. 4 of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 28451 of 1991 against the order dated 8th March, 1994, passed by the learned Single Judge by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2000

Amar Nath Swami Vs. Ramdeo

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24 and 24(5) - OrderVII, Rule 10 and 10A(2)(3) and B; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 407

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1110

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Pandey, Adv.

D. K. Seth, J. 1. S.C.C. Suit No. 1 of 1998 was filed before the learned Civil Judge. Basti, who has Jurisdiction to try the Small Causes Court valued upto Rs. 25,000. Initially the said suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1980

Pheroo and ors. Vs. Umrao and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-1980

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100-101 - Order 41, Rule 31

Reported in : AIR1981All27

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Pandey, Adv.

V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. This is a defendants second appeal.2. The plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession over the land in question, along with trees and bamboo clumps...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 25 2004

Charan Singh and ors. Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-25-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 21; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 17; Uttar Pradesh Indian Medicine Act, 1939 - Sections 39; Uttar Pradesh Medical Institutions (Acquisition and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1982 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR2004All373; 2004(4)AWC3186

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Tripathi, ;S.P.S. Rathore and ;B.N. Pandey, Advs.

ORDERSunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard S/Sri R. K. Tripathi, S.P.S. Rathore B. N. Pandey for petitioners and learned standing counsel. This matter has been placed before me in vacations under the Rules of the Court, after nomination...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2004

Sanjay Sinha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-06-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132(3) and 275A

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Pandey, Adv.

Navin Sinha, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel on behalf of the opposite parties.2. The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated March 18, 2000, passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1997

Sinha K.C. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Dec-02-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 88 and 92; Factories Rules, 1950 - Rule 36; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Pandey, Vijay Pratap Singh and Arun Kumar Singh, Advs.

N.K. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri P.N. Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.Y. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is the Manager of M/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2001

Ghannu Mal and ors. Vs. Additional Distt. Magistrate (C.S.)/R.C.E.O., ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-06-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 16(1) and 34(4); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 25

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2563

Advocate for Appellant : J.N. Pandey, ;B.N. Tripathi and ;Y.N Srivastava, Advs.

U.K. Dhaon, J.1. Heard Sri J. N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel, who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 1.2. The petitioners have approached this Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2002

Subhas Chand Bharati Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-14-2002

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2166

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Pandey, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 25th January, 2001 passed by the trial court decreeing the suit of landlord against the petitioner for ejectment due to arrears of rent. Against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2002

Lalu Prasad Alias Lalu Prasad Yadav Vs. State Through C.B.i. (A.H.D.)

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-10-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 273

Reported in : 2003CriLJ610

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Pandey, Sr. Adv.,; Chitranjan Sinha, Adv.,; Prabhat

ORDERDeoki Nandan Prasad, J.1. All the applications mentioned above have been heard together as the question relating to amalgamation of all the respective cases into one arisen and are being disposed of by this common order.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2001

Laldas Alias Lilardas Sahu Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Apr-19-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9, 27 and 45; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT49(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri B.N. Pandey, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 1989 (Laldas v. State of M.P.), Criminal Appeal No. 208 of 1989 (Kamal Mahar v. State of M.P.) and Criminal Appeal No. 209...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial