Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n nagaraj · Page 1 of about 60 results (0.089 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 02 2024

Mysore And Chamarajanagar District Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

- 1 - WA No.1333/2023 C/W WA NOs.1300/2023, 1322/2023 1348/2023, 1391/2023, 1392/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1994

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajalakshmi Venkatakrishnan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-17-1994

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24) and 28; Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 5

Reported in : [1995]215ITR596(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Deokinandan, Adv.

Thanikkachalam, J. 1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following question for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2018

Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-10-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

1/123 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016, W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017, W.P.Nos.27983-27994/2016, W.P.Nos.27995-28006/2016, W.P.Nos.28796/2016 & 28997 - 29007/2016, W.P.Nos.31159-31170/2016, W.P.Nos.31430-31441/2016, W.P.Nos.33906-33917/2016, W.P.Nos.34001/2016 &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 02 2009

Government of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Financ ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-2009

Subject : ConstitutionSales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(1), 9(2) to 9(4), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to (9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79(1); Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2006; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2007; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rule; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : ILR2009KAR633

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rabinathan,; Thirumalesh, Advs. in W.P. 9689 and 15084/2006,; R.V. Prasad, Adv. in W.P. 14926/2006,; B.P. Gandhi, Adv. in W.P. 67 and 69/2007,; C.R. Pandit, Adv. in W.P. 483/2007,; Atul K. Alur,

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act] and also dealers who are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2009

Philips Electronics India Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : [2009]20STT314

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rabinathan, ;M. Thirumalesh, ;R.V. Prasad, ;B.P. Gandhi, ;C.R. Pandit, ;Atul K. Alur, ;H.S. Hayath Khan Naushad, ;C. Basavaiah, ;H.B.V. Patil, ;Shalini Patil, ;M.N. Shankare Gowda, ;N. Nagaraju, ;G

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, 'the Act'] and also dealers who are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2009

Philips Electronics India Ltd. Reptd. by Its Manager - Corporate Fisca ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 12(1), 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : 2009(3)AIRKarR1; AIR2009NOC2187

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rabinathan and ;M. Thirumalesh, Advs. in WP Nos. 9689 and 15084 of 2006 and 6531 of 2007, ;R.V. Prasad, Adv. in WP No. 14926 of 2006, ;B.P. Gandhi, Adv. in WP Nos. 67 and 69 of 2007, ;C.R. Pandit,

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act and also dealers who are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2012

Shri Bengali Babu and Others Vs. Director (Local Bodies) and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Oct-18-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dr. Veena Chhotray: MA 2412/2012 has been filed by Shri N.C. Meena, the Pvt. Respondent in the OA 2449/2012. Through this MA the maintainability of the OA has been challenged with a prayer for its dismissal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2001

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : May-28-2001

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(133)ELT179Tri(Bang.)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Chandra Kumar

1. These are two appeals filed by the Revenue against the impugned Order-in-Appeal No 26/95 dated 30.11.95 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore.The Assistant Commissioner as per his Order has held that the above...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1992

United India Insurance Co. Vs. Kalavathi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-02-1992

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64VB

Reported in : 1992ACJ888; ILR1992KAR2403; 1992(3)KarLJ121

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Kambeyanda, Stdg. Counsel

Rama Jois, J1. The facts of this Appeal presented by the United India insurance Company demonstrates that the Insurance Company has to safeguard itself against the acts of its own agents and Officers in order to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1992

United India Insurance Co. Vs. Smt. Kalavati and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-02-1992

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Acts : Insurance Act, Section 64-VB; Order 41; Rule 25

Reported in : II(1992)ACC424

Rama Jois, J.1. The facts of this Appeal presented by the United India Insurance Company Demonstrates that the Insurance Company has to safeguard itself against the acts of its own agents and Officers in order to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial