Advanced Search Results
Mysore And Chamarajanagar District Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-02-2024
Land Acquisition
- 1 - WA No.1333/2023 C/W WA NOs.1300/2023, 1322/2023 1348/2023, 1391/2023, 1392/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajalakshmi Venkatakrishnan
Chennai
Nov-17-1994
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24) and 28; Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 5
[1995]215ITR596(Mad)
Deokinandan, Adv.
Thanikkachalam, J. 1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following question for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-10-2018
Land Acquisition
1/123 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016, W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017, W.P.Nos.27983-27994/2016, W.P.Nos.27995-28006/2016, W.P.Nos.28796/2016 & 28997 - 29007/2016, W.P.Nos.31159-31170/2016, W.P.Nos.31430-31441/2016, W.P.Nos.33906-33917/2016, W.P.Nos.34001/2016 &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Government of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Financ ...
Karnataka
Jan-02-2009
ConstitutionSales Tax/VAT
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(1), 9(2) to 9(4), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to (9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79(1); Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2006; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2007; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rule; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 19, 19(1) and 19(6)
ILR2009KAR633
G. Rabinathan,; Thirumalesh, Advs. in W.P. 9689 and 15084/2006,; R.V. Prasad, Adv. in W.P. 14926/2006,; B.P. Gandhi, Adv. in W.P. 67 and 69/2007,; C.R. Pandit, Adv. in W.P. 483/2007,; Atul K. Alur,
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act] and also dealers who are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhilips Electronics India Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-02-2009
Service Tax
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 19(6)
[2009]20STT314
G. Rabinathan, ;M. Thirumalesh, ;R.V. Prasad, ;B.P. Gandhi, ;C.R. Pandit, ;Atul K. Alur, ;H.S. Hayath Khan Naushad, ;C. Basavaiah, ;H.B.V. Patil, ;Shalini Patil, ;M.N. Shankare Gowda, ;N. Nagaraju, ;G
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, 'the Act'] and also dealers who are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhilips Electronics India Ltd. Reptd. by Its Manager - Corporate Fisca ...
Karnataka
Jan-02-2009
Sales Tax/VAT
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 12(1), 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6)
2009(3)AIRKarR1; AIR2009NOC2187
G. Rabinathan and ;M. Thirumalesh, Advs. in WP Nos. 9689 and 15084 of 2006 and 6531 of 2007, ;R.V. Prasad, Adv. in WP No. 14926 of 2006, ;B.P. Gandhi, Adv. in WP Nos. 67 and 69 of 2007, ;C.R. Pandit,
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act and also dealers who are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Bengali Babu and Others Vs. Director (Local Bodies) and Others
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Oct-18-2012
Land Acquisition
Dr. Veena Chhotray: MA 2412/2012 has been filed by Shri N.C. Meena, the Pvt. Respondent in the OA 2449/2012. Through this MA the maintainability of the OA has been challenged with a prayer for its dismissal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
May-28-2001
Excise
(2001)(133)ELT179Tri(Bang.)
Shri. Chandra Kumar
1. These are two appeals filed by the Revenue against the impugned Order-in-Appeal No 26/95 dated 30.11.95 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore.The Assistant Commissioner as per his Order has held that the above...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Co. Vs. Kalavathi
Karnataka
Apr-02-1992
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64VB
1992ACJ888; ILR1992KAR2403; 1992(3)KarLJ121
C.K. Kambeyanda, Stdg. Counsel
Rama Jois, J1. The facts of this Appeal presented by the United India insurance Company demonstrates that the Insurance Company has to safeguard itself against the acts of its own agents and Officers in order to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Co. Vs. Smt. Kalavati and ors.
Karnataka
Apr-02-1992
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
Insurance Act, Section 64-VB; Order 41; Rule 25
II(1992)ACC424
Rama Jois, J.1. The facts of this Appeal presented by the United India Insurance Company Demonstrates that the Insurance Company has to safeguard itself against the acts of its own agents and Officers in order to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »