Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n n tiwari · Page 1 of about 253 results (0.090 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 2004

Shyam Sunder Barnwal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-14-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Santhal Pragana Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949 - Sections 20; Bihar Stamps (Prevention of Under Valuation of Instruments) Rules, 1995; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR371(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwari and; R.R. Tiwari, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order issued by the Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Registrar, Deoghar vide Memo No. 10, dated 14.1.2004 whereby he has imposed a mandatory condition of production verification report of the Circle...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2004

Saroj Devi and ors. Vs. Manik Chand Sarawgi and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-14-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 111 and 116

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR368(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwary, Adv.

P.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J. 1. Defendant No. 2 and the legal representatives of the deceased defendant No. 1 in Title Suit No. 24 of 1996 on the file of the Munsifs Court at Ranchi are the appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2003

Bijay Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. Ranchi University and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-10-2003

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 309

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR127(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwari, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. N.N. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K. Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. In this writ application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the office...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 10 2003

Ram Pran Ram Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Bihar and Orissa Subordinate Services Discipline and Appeal, Rules, 1935 - Rules 2(1) and 10(3); Board Miscellaneous Rules - Rule 168; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR340(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwari, Adv.

ORDERTapen Sen, J. 1. Heard Mr. N.N. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears for the State Respondents.2. Petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is aggrieved by the order dated 23.12.1993 passed by the Deputy...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2003

Smt. Gulabasi Devi and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-31-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR41(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwary, Sr. Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire proceeding and the order dated 23.7.1994 passed in Miscellaneous Case No. 40/1993-94 whereby the respondent No. 2 Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa purported...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2003

Ram Naresh Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-24-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Bihar Forest Rules

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR195(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwari, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. N.N. Tiwari, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioner. Mr. R.K. Chbudhary, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 8 and Mr. Aniket, JC to SC I for the Respondent State.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2003

Food Corporation of India Vs. Munnalal Jain, Ex-handling Transport Con ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-03-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 34 and 39(1)

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR392(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwari, Sr. Counsel and; R.R. Tiwari, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. This appeal under Section 39(1)(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 at the instance of the appellant-Food Corporation of India is directed against the judgment and decree dated 14.12.1994 passed by Sub-Judge I,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2003

Chamundeshwari Corporation Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-24-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR862; [2003(2)JCR552(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwari, Sr. Adv.,; Ritu Kumar and; R.R. Tiwary,

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioner seeks appropriate direction upon the respondents to issue dispatch instruction and take delivery of 2149 Adult Weighting Scales by making payment of the price thereof as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2001

Gouri Shankar Prasad and ors. Vs. Brahmanand Singh

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-22-2001

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLI, Rule 11

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR2168

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Tiwari, Adv.

ORDERDeoki Nandan Prasad, J. 1. This second appeal is directed against the judgment dated 9.8.2000 and the decree signed on 21.8.2000 passed by the District Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj in Title Appeal No. 10 of 1997...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2004

Akhileshwar Singh and ors. and Sachindra Kumar and anr. Vs. State of B ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-22-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR261]; [2004(4)JCR582(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Verma, Adv. in LPA 707/2003,; Delip Jerath, Manoj Tandon,;

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.1. In both the appeals, as common judgment is under challenge, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. The appellants applied for appointment against Class-Ill posts under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial