Advanced Search Results
Union of India and Others Vs. Praveen Gupta and Others
Supreme Court of India
Oct-04-1996
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5-A, 6 and 17(4)
AIR1997SC170; JT1996(9)SC624; 1996(7)SCALE819; (1997)9SCC78; [1996]Supp7SCR201; 1997(1)LC78(SC)
N.N. Goswami,; B.K. Prasad and; S.P. Singh, Advs
1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.3. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court made on July 14, 1992 in L.P.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Another Vs. Pradeep Kumari and Others
Supreme Court of India
Mar-10-1995
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 11, 18, 26, 28A and 34; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984
AIR1995SC2259; 1996(6)KarLJ557; 1996(1)KLT93(SC); 1995(2)SCALE260; (1995)2SCC736; [1995]2SCR703; 1995 INSC 180
N.N. Goswamy,; B.K. Pradesh,; T.C. Shrama,;
ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. By these Review Petitions the petitioners are seeking review of the order dated October 8, 1991 whereby Civil Appeals Nos. 2320-21 of 1991 filed by the petitioners have been dismissed. The said Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Ajoy Kumar Patnaik
Supreme Court of India
Sep-08-1995
ConstitutionService
Fundamental Rule - 56
AIR1996SC280; JT1995(7)SC30; 1995LabIC2712; 1995(5)SCALE490; (1995)6SCC442; [1995]Supp3SCR449; 1996(1)SLJ138(SC)
N.N. Goswami,; C.V.S. Rao and; Y.P. Mahajan,;Adv
1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench dated July 19, 1991 made in O.A. No. 425 of 1986. The respondent's case, while working as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Karam Chand Thapar and Brs. (Coal Sales) Ltd. ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-10-2004
Commercial
Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974 - Sections 4(2), 5(2), 9, 10, 10(2), 12 and 18; Coal Mines (Conservation and Safety) Act, 1952; - Sections 13(3); Coal Mines (Conservations and Safety) Rules, 1954 - Rules 35(2), 36, 37, 40(3) and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 6 and 6(1)
(SCSuppl)2004(3)CHN144; [2004(2)JCR278(SC)]; JT2004(3)SC286; (2004)3MLJ146(SC); 2004(3)SCALE203; (2004)3SCC504
N.N. Goswami, Sr. Adv.,; Y.P. Mahajan,; Ajay Sharma and;
R.C. Lahoti, J. 1. Just bare essential facts, as ascertainable on retrieval from a jumble of facts, are set out hereinafter, as those would suffice, in our opinion, to appreciate the crux of controversy arising for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. C. Rama Swamy and Others
Supreme Court of India
Apr-09-1997
Constitution Service
All India Services (Death-cum-retirement Benefits) Amendment Rules, 1971; Indian Administrative Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1945 - Rule 5; Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954 - Rule 4
AIR1997SC2055; JT1997(4)SC605; 1997(3)SCALE528; (1997)4SCC647; [1997]3SCR760
N.N. Goswamy,; Hemant Sharma and; P. Parmeswaran, Advs
ORDERB.N. Kirpal, J.1. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the respondent was entitled to ask for an alteration of his date of birth as entered in his service record, which entry...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. V. Pundarikakshudu and Sons and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-09-2003
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration Act - Sections 15, 16, 30, 32 and 73
AIR2003SC3209; 2003(3)ARBLR168(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC175; 2003(7)SCALE323; (2003)8SCC168; [2003]47SCL809(SC)
N.N. Goswami, Sr. Adv.,; C.V.S. Rao, Adv. for; Anil Katiyar
S.B. Sinha, J.1. The appellant and the first respondent herein entered into a contract for construction of an auditorium complex at Willington Nilgiris for a sum of Rs. 64,79,982,95. The work commenced on 16.3.1979 and was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. R.K. JaIn (Raj Kumar JaIn Huf) and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income ...
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-15-1996
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1), 276C, 277, 278B and 278B(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1996]221ITR136(P& H)
N.N. Goswami,; A.P. Bhandari, Senior Advs. and; Anil Agg
Swatanter Kumar, J. 1. The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is for quashing of the complaint under Sections 276C, 277 read with Section 278B of the Income tax Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Hari Krishan Khosla (Dead) by Lrs.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-16-1992
Property
Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 - Sections 7(3), 8(1), 8(2) and 8(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 31B; Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1); Land Aquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 and 34
JT1992(5)SC574; 1992(2)SCALE621; 1993Supp(2)SCC149; [1992]Supp1SCR620; (1993)1UPLBEC145
Altaf Ahmed, Additional Solicitor General,; N.N. Goswamy,; D.V
S. Mohan, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals which are dealt with under a common judgment raise the only question of law as to whether Section 8(3)(a) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952(Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Singh Sant Ram Vs. Jasmer Singh Hardit Singh and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-11-1959
CivilProperty
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 36, 72 and 77
AIR1959P& H582
N.N. Goswami, Adv.
G.L. Chopra, J.1. The case giving rise to these two regular second appeals Nos. 282 and 283 of 1954 has had a chequered history. A small piece of agricultural land measuring about 7 Bighas and 18...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Level Limited Vs. Director General (investigation and Regist ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-10-2001
Commercial
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 10, 37 and 38(1)
AIR2001SC661; JT2001(3)SC37; 2001(1)SCALE219; [2001]1SCR318; 2001(1)LC373(SC)
N.N. Goswami, Sr. Adv.,; Aditya Narain,; Manish Mishra,;
Kirpal, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to a cease and desist order passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (for short 'the Commission') against the appellant herein. 2. It seems that certain...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »