Advanced Search Results

A.H.Q. Canteen Employees Association Vs. U.O.i.and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : [2000(86)FLR448]

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.N. Dhingra, Proxy Counse

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J. 1. Rule. In this case petitioner which is association of AHQ canteen employees has prayed for the following directions: a) direct the respondents by way of an order/writ/direction in the nature of mandamus...

Gurcharan Singh Sethi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)527

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.N. Dhingra, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. The petitioner has challenged his retirement from service w.e.f. 30.11.1989 on the ground that he has wrongly been retired as his date of birth is 29.11.1931 as per which he would have attained...

Basant Dayal Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)856; 81(1999)DLT343

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Dhingra, Adv

ORDERCW 1001/991. Heard. 2. The petitioner by way of this writ petition seeks a direction against the respondents recalling the letters dated 5th January,1999 and 15th January,1999 suspending mutation in favor of the petitioner and has...

Management of Horticulture Deptt. of Delhi Adm. Vs. Workmen Shri R. Mu ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(5) and 25F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)828; 86(2000)DLT467; (2000)IILLJ1175Del

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.N. Dhingra, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition against the Award dated 2.4.1996 passed by Labour Court-VII in I.D. No. 611/88. Vide order dated 12.9.88 dispute was referred to Labour Court for adjudication with...

Master Kunal Vs. Harsh Dev Shinghari and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act - Sections 37 and 37(1)

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT299; 2003(66)DRJ57

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Sengh and; Arun Sharma, Advs

K.S. Gupta, J. 1. I heard Sh. J.P. Sengh for plaintiff, Sh. D.C. Vohra for defendants 1, 2 & 8 and Sh. N.N. Dhingra for defendants 5 & 7 on the issue if requisite court fee...