Advanced Search Results

N.N. Bose and Nephew Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(108)ECC114

1. This is an application filed by the Customs House Agents Company, M/s. N.N. Bose & Nephew, challenging the Order of the Commissioner of Customs (Port) dated 30.3.2005, imposing a penalty of Rs. 1.00 lakh (Rupees...

Nagarmull Chaudhuri Vs. Jhabarmull Sureka

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1933Cal909

Ameer Ali, J.1. In this case there must be a decree for the plaintiff, and I assess the damages at Rs. 3,000. Para, (1) of the plaint reads as follows:The defendant, on 3rd January 1930, maliciously...

Brahma Shum Shere Jung Bahadur and anr. Vs. Chartered Bank of India, A ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 57, 63, 63(2) and 73; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 10, 85(1), 89 and 131

Reported in : AIR1956Cal399

Advocate for Appellant : N.H. Sanyal, ;S. Banerjee, ;B.K. Ghose and ;D. Choudhuri, Advs.

Bose, J. 1. This is a suit for a declaration that the accounts of the plaintiffs with the defendant No. 1 have been improperly debited with, and the plaintiffs are not liable for, the sum of...

Gokuldas and anr. Vs. Chagan Lal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1928Cal887

C.C. Ghose, J.1. This is an appeal against a decision of my learned brother Mr. Page, J., by which he dismissed the plaintiffs' suit in the circumstances hereinafter mentioned. The suit was instituted on 23rd March...

M.B. Sirkar and Sons Vs. Powell and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1956Cal630,60CWN840

Advocate for Appellant : N.N. Bose, ;Gauri Mitter and ;D. Pal, Advs.

Chakravartti, C.J.1. This is an appeal from an order of P. B. Mukhar-ji, J., dated 22-6-1955, by which the learned Judge allowed an amendment of the respondent's plaint. By that amendment, the original defendant in the...

Micro Electronics Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(24)LC179Tri(Delhi)

1. This appeal is directed against the adjudication order No.34/85-PREV. dated 2.8.1985 (issued on 6.9.85) passed by the Collector of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal, ordering the confiscation of seized goods under Section 111(d), (m) and (p)...

Iic Container Line(S) Pte Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Miscellaneous

ORDER SHEET WP No.112 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IIC CONTAINER LINE(S) PTE LTD.& ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date :...

Collector of Customs, Calcutta Vs. Sanjay Chandiram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 14 and 111; Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 - Rules 3, 4 and 8; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947; Imports (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : 1996(54)ECC1; 1995(77)ELT241(SC); JT1995(7)SC499; 1995(3)SCALE262; (1995)4SCC222; [1995]Supp1SCR19

Suhas S. Sen, J.1. M/s. Shiv Shankar International, 69/10, 72 Canning Street, Calcutta, imported the following four consignments of Zip Rolls from Singapore and filed four Bills of Entry in the Customs House, Calcutta, as follows:-(1)...

The State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sallendra Nath Bose

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311 and 361(1)

Reported in : AIR1964Cal184,68CWN203

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Bose, ;B. Das and ;S. Bose, Advs.

Mitter, J. 1. This is an appeal by the state of West Bengal and others against the issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of dismissal passed on the respondent and...

Nidhusudan Mukherjee and ors. Vs. Smt. Bibhabati Debi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR1940Cal395

Panckridge, J.1. This case raises questions of considerable difficulty with regard to the construction of the Provident Funds Act (Act 19 of 1925) and of the General Provident Fund (Bengal Services) Rules. The facts are as...