Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n muthuswamy · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.033 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 16 2009

The Superintending Engineer, Vs. Vadivelu and Bavayee

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-16-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 10 and 42; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 16, 18, 19 and 51; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 16; Telegraph Act, 1995 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 188

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ1005

Advocate for Appellant : N. Muthuswamy, Adv.

M. Duraiswamy, J.1. The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 33 of 1996 on the file of Subordinate Court, Sankagiri confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 237 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2007

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, by Its Junior Engineer O and M, Melpatti ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Tamil Nadu Revision of Tariff on Supply of Electrical Energy Act, 1978 - Sections 4

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ42

Advocate for Appellant : N. Muthuswami, Adv.

K. Mohan Ram, J.1. The unsuccessful defendant in O.S.No. 631 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Gudiyattam, has filed the above second appeal.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2007

Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Superintending Engineer, Ta ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-23-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 91 and 91(1)

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ103

Advocate for Appellant : N. Muthuswami, Adv.

S. Tamilvanan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Decree, dated 29.07.1994 made in O.S. No. 81 of 1992 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Arni.2. The respondents/defendants are the Legal Representatives...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 1952

Valchand Gulabchand Shah Vs. Manekbai Hirachand Shah and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-1952

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rules 1, 2, 15 and 15(2) - Order 32, Rule 7; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 88; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 244 and 258

Reported in : AIR1953Bom137; (1952)54BOMLR901; ILR1953Bom356

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kavalekar and ;R.G. Samant, Advs.

Rajadhyaksha, J. (1) This is an appeal under the Letters Patent from a decision of Mr. Justice Shah in First Appeal No. 284 of 1949 which confirmed the order of the Civil Judge. Senior Division, Sholapur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1990

V. Elangovan Vs. the Assistant Divisional Engineer, Madras Electricity ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-06-1990

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (1991)211MLJ1

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. Kannadasan

ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. When the miscellaneous petition came up for hearing by consent of both parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows:to direct the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2014

Subbaraya Gounder Vs. Ponnathal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-10-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:10. - 04  2014 Coram The Hon'ble TMT. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Second Appeal No.1162 of 2006 and M.P. No.1 of 2006 1. Subbaraya Gounder 2. Lakshmi .....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2007

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by Its Chairman Vs. Aries and Aries ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-2007

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 18, 55, 113 and 120; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 56 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34

Reported in : (2007)2MLJ1057

Advocate for Appellant : N. Muthuswami, Adv.

P.K. Misra, J.1. This appeal is filed by the defendant against the judgment of the learned single Judge in C.S. No. 130 of 1987, decreeing in part the claims made by the plaintiff. 2. The admitted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2008

The Executive Engineer (Distribution), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-05-2008

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126(5), 126, 126(6), 135 to 139, 153(5), 154, 172, 185, 185(1), 185(2) and 185(5); Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Supply Act, 1943; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 14; Electricity Rules; Electricity Regulations

Reported in : AIR2008Mad148; (2008)2MLJ812

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Raman, AAG for N. Muthuswami, Adv.

Elipe Dharma Rao, J.1. Since in all these matters, a common question of law is involved, ail these matters are taken up for common hearing and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1991

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Karuppa Naicker and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-1991

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1992ACJ901

Advocate for Appellant : N. Muthuswamy, Adv.

M. Srinivasan, J. 1. It is very unfortunate that the Tribunal has not taken note of the correct facts in this case. There is no dispute that one Angammal died on account of accident on 19.2.1983....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1954

Dhondhey Prasad Vs. Sewak and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-1954

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38 - Order 21, Rules 1, 2 and 15

Reported in : AIR1954All739

Advocate for Appellant : H.D. Srivastava, Adv.

Beg, J. 1. This appeal arises out of execution proceedings. 2. It would appear that a mortgage decree was passed in favour of three brothers, namely, Ram Sewak, Ram Sudhist and Ram Naresh against one Sewak,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial