Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n manoharan · Page 1 of about 168 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 17 2003

The Special Tahsildar (La) Neighbourhood Scheme Vs. Arthanari Gounder ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-17-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 and 54

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC121

Advocate for Appellant : R. Asokan, Additional Government Pleader, ;Duraiswamy, Adv. in A.S. No. 1359 and 569 of 2002 and ;N. Manoharan, Adv. in A.S. No. 754 to 760 of 2002

ORDERPrabha Sridevan, J. 1. Vast extent of lands were acquired for the purpose of Neighbourhood scheme for the construction of LIG/MIG/HIG Scheme by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board in the Village of Erode. Section 4(1) Notifications...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2007

N. Ayyasamy Vs. S.K. Chinnasamy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2007

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 243, 243(2) and 313

Reported in : IV(2008)BC645

Advocate for Appellant : N. Manoharan, Adv.

K. Mohanram, J.1. The petitioner is facing trial for the offences under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C. No. 406 of 2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. II, Erode. During...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2007

T. Tamilarasan Vs. Arokkiasamy, Thomas and Devasagayam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-22-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 17, 21, 58 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rules 27 and 28

Reported in : 2007(3)CTC456; (2007)3MLJ857

Advocate for Appellant : N. Manoharan, Adv.

P. Jyothimani, J.1. The plaintiff in the trial court is the appellant in the second appeal. The suit was filed for a permanent injunction against the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the property...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 04 2007

A. Petchimuthu Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Khadi and V ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-04-2007

Subject : ServiceCivil

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ700

Advocate for Appellant : N. Manoharan, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. In W.P. No. 11316 of 2007, the petitioner challenges the order of suspension dated 28.02.2007 on the ground that the charge memo itself is under challenge in W.P. No. 10570 of 2007 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2007

Minor Shyamala and ors. Vs. A. Madheswaran and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-05-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92A, 110A to 110F, 110(1), 165(1), 166, 166(1) and 168; Hindu Succession Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(11)

Reported in : 2009ACJ1243; AIR2008Mad1

Advocate for Appellant : Anandamoorthi and ;N. Manoharan, Advs.

S. Manikumar, J.1. The first appellant claimed herself to be the adopted minor child of the deceased. Appellants 2 and 3 are the parents of the deceased. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 5-2-2001 made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2010

S.Mangaiyarkarasi. Vs. M.Narayanan.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.N.Manoharan, Adv.

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order passed by the lower Court in I.A.No. 70 of 2006 in O.S.No.81 of 2001 dated 10.08.2006, on the file of Additional District Court / Fast...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2001

K. Marappa Gounder Vs. Cgt

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-10-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Mad)403

Advocate for Appellant : N. Manoharan, for the Assessee Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, for the Revenue

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.The question referred to us at the instance of the assessee is as to whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in fixing the value...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2026

D.Selvi Sarojini Bai Vs C.Samaya Moorthy, I.A.S

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA D.Selvi Sarojini Bai W/o. P.Simson, Plot No. 518, Secretariat Colony, Okkiam Thuraipakkam, Chennai - 600 097. ..Petitioner(s) Vs C.Samaya Moorthy, I.A.S State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2015

P.Joseph Raj Vs. 1.The District Collector,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM W.P(MD)No.8723 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 P.Joseph Raj .Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Dindugal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2013

R.Thirunavukkarasu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-05-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :05. 04.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Appeal Nos.849 to 854 of 2010 and 2066 of 2010 and Writ Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial