Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n m kachare · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.052 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 05 1994

Anant B. Kamble and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-05-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 324 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR224; (1994)96BOMLR138; 1995CriLJ2382

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Marwadi, Adv., holding for A.P. Mundargi

1. The appellants aggrieved by their conviction under S. 304-II read with S. 34 of the IPC and the sentence of 5 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/- each and one month in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1983

Meharunnishabai (Smt.) W/O. Abdul Razak and anr. Vs. Abdul Razak Moham ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1983

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 497

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR473

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv S. Mohite, Adv.;N.H. Kachare, P.P.

S.C. Pratap, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated January 13, 1982 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nasik, in Criminal Revision Application No. 181 of 1981.2. Petitioner No. 1 had filed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1982

Shahaji Dattu Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-1982

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 323; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR418

Advocate for Appellant : Shamrao G. Samant, Adv.

S.C. Pratap, J.1. In Sessions Case No. 29 of 1980, Sessions Court, Kolhapur, original accused Nos. 1 to 3 were charged with the offence of having committed murder of one Rama Govinda Patil, being offence punishable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 16 1992

Rahimtulla Khan Vs. Commissioner of Police Gr. Bom. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-16-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot-leggers and Drug Offenders Act, 1981 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR377

Advocate for Appellant : Shahbi K. Jain, Adv.

S.W. Puranik, J.1. Petitioner is the husband of detenue---Smt. Nabvat Nisha alias Baidawali who has been detained by an order dated 2-6-1992 passed by the 1st respondent under section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1982

State of Maharashtra Vs. Maganlal Harjiwan Tambodia and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-09-1982

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 9 and 20; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 6, 8 and 9

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR516

ORDER1. The State of Maharashtra has filed his revision against the order of discharge passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 17th Court, Mazgaon, Bombay, dated April 20, 1981.2. It is not necessary to go into the merits...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1982

State of Maharashtra Vs. Maganlal Harjiwan Tambodia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-09-1982

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1148; 1982MhLJ635

ORDERS.J. Deshpande, J.1. The State of Maharashtra has filed this revision against the order of discharge passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 17th Court, Mazgaon, Bombay, dated April 20. 1981.2. It is not necessary to go into...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 1978

Tata Hydro Electric Power Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal Commission ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-13-1978

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 3, 146(2) and 217

Reported in : AIR1979Bom10

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Kachare and ;D.G. Koranne, Advs.

1. The above First Appeals involve an important common question, about the rateable value of the lands, which were acquired for the appellants M/s. Tata Hydro Electric Power Supply Co. Ltd. for erecting the towers for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1978

Venkatrao Narayanrao Ambekar Vs. the Alma Sugar Mills and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-10-1978

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 6(2) and 46; Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963; ;Maharashtra Purchase Tax on Sugarcane Act, 1962 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1979Bom38

Advocate for Appellant : L.V. Kapse and ;S.J. Deshpande, Advs.;N.M. Kachare, Public Prosecutor

1. This is an appeal preferred on behalf of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee of Aurangabad challenging the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, of Aurangabad in Summary Case No. 646...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1993

William Rosario Vs. Malcom Francis Anthony Pereira and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-02-1993

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1537

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Mohite, Adv.;Malcolm Pereira, Adv., i/b., ;Wilfred Pereira and Co. and ;N.M. Kachare, A.P.P.

ORDER1. This petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenges the order dated 15-4-1988 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37th Court, Esplanade, Bombay, by which Case No. 136/I&R; of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1984

State of Maharashtra Vs. Abdul Nathu Tadvil

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-27-1984

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377(1); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 67(1)

Reported in : 1985(1)BomCR412

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Kachare, Adv.

M.S. Jamdar, J.1. The State has preferred all these appeals under section 377(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for enhancing the sentence inflicted on the respondent for the offence under section 67(1)(a) of the Bombay Prohibition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial