Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n m ganguli · Page 1 of about 93 results (0.066 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 11 2007

Hindoostan Spg. and Wvg. Mills Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Crown Mills Siddhivi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-11-2007

Subject : SICA

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 - Sections 14, 15, 16, 16(3) and 17; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O, 25O(1), 25(O)(2), 25(O)(5), 25O(6), 25(O)(7), 25(O)(8), 17 and 20; Companies Act - Sections 293(1); Evidence Act - Sections 101; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 196 and 228; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6), 21 and 226

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR376; 2007(4)BomCR568; (2008)ILLJ243Bom; 2007(5)MhLj801

Advocate for Appellant : Federal and Rashmikant, Adv. in Appeal Nos. 364/05 and 458/05; ;N.M.Ganguli and ;K.R.Chaudhary, Advs. for appellant Nos. 1 and 2 in Appeal No. 441/05

Vijay C. Daga, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 21st February, 2004 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.1097/2004; 1160/2004 and 1702/2004, out of which two are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1994

Poonvasi and ors. Vs. Crown Silk Weaving Industries and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-17-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25A, 25F, 25J, 25-O, 25-O(1), 25-(7), 25FF, 25FFA, 25FFF and 25FFF(1)

Reported in : 1994(1)MhLj847

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. M. Ganguli

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. The writ petition has been filed by the twelve workmen whose services came to an end as a result of closure of the establishment of the respondent No. 1, Crown Silk Weaving...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2001

Supertex (India) Corporation and anr. Vs. Radheshyam K. Pandey and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 5, 7 and 28

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR670; 2001(4)BomCR723; [2002(92)FLR474]

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Rele and ;Piyush Shah, Advs. in W.P. No. 1589/1997 and ;N.M. Ganguli, Adv. in W.P. No. 2395/1998

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. In the two petitions which are being disposed of by this common judgment, an Order of the Industrial Court dated 30th July 1997 on a complaint of unfair labour practices under Items 1(a),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 2005

Association of Engineering Workers Vs. V.K. Date and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 25(2), 28 and 59; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Bombay Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : [2006(108)FLR1184]; (2006)IILLJ625Bom

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Ganguli, Adv.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Association of Engineering Workers (for short, 'the Union') filed the writ petition before this Court praying therein that direction be issued to the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation Officer) to initiate conciliation proceedings...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2004

Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Private Limited Vs. Kherulla Ha ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR626; 2005(2)BomCR206; [2005(104)FLR547]; (2005)ILLJ697Bom; 2005(1)MhLj317

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama, Adv., i/b., K.P. Anilkumar

V.C. Daga, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order 28th April, 2000 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition No. 147 of 1995 confirming the order dated 7-10-1994 passed by the Presiding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2013

M/S. Glasstech Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. the Workmen Represent ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-16-2013

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Oral Judgment: 1 Rule. With the consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2 The Writ Jurisdiction of this under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked against the Award dated 30-6-2012...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2007

Fancy Corporation Limited Vs. Girdhari Mangru Yadav

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-29-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 78, 79 and 84; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR622; (2007)109BOMLR871; [2007(113)FLR953]

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Madan, Adv.

V.C. Daga, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Perused petition. 2. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order of the Labour Court in Application (BIR) No. 740 of 1984 dated 25th April,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2012

National Textile Corporation (South Maharashtra) Limited (Unit Apollo ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-13-2012

Subject : Labour and Industrial

This Petition has been filed by the Petitioner, a Government Company registered under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956, impugning the order of the Labour Court dated 23 December 2004 and the order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 1997

Ambika Silk Mills Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-21-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 21 and 28; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 30; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25-O and 10(1);

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR609; 1998(2)BomCR148; [1998(79)FLR1]; (1999)IIILLJ1095Bom; 1998(1)MhLj568

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Singhvi, ;S.A., M.M. Verma, ;P.M. Palshikar and ;N.M. Ganguli, Advs.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. These two writ petitions are between the same parties and the issues involved are inter-connected and, therefore, both the writ petitions have been heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2004

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. J.K. Chemicals Limited, a Company ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-08-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : MRTU and PULP Act - Sections 25; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 33(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR760; 2004(2)BomCR484; [2004(101)FLR90]; (2004)IILLJ798Bom

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Ganguli, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Petition, the Petitioner Maharashtra Judgment dated 19th January, 1989 passed by the Respondent No. 2 - the Presiding Officer, 1st Labour Court, Maharashtra, Bombay in the Reference (I.D.A.) No. 12 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial