Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n l jadhav · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.119 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 21 1998

Raosaheb S/O Babasaheb Kakade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 39; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961 - Sections 111(13) and 119(1)

Reported in : 1999(3)ALLMR194; 1999(3)BomCR25; 1999(2)MhLj367

Advocate for Appellant : N.L. Jadhav, Adv.

ORDERN.P. Chapalgaonker, J. 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Taken up forthwith for hearing by consent. 3. An action was initiated to remove the respondent No, 3 Sahebrao Bajirao Amte, Sarpanch of the Village Panchayat Bedarwadi, Tq. Patoda,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2011

Sow. Girika Wo Badamrao Pandit and ors. Vs. Dist. Beed. the State of M ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-2011

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Council and Nagar Panchayat Act - Section 16 (1) (K),; Maharashtra Municipal Corporations and Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships ( second Amendment ) Act, 1995 ; Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 - Section 55 B

1. The petitioner and respondent nos. 3 to 5 filled in nominations for the election of Councillor of Gevrai Municipal Council from Ward No. 2-B. 2. The objection was taken to the nomination of respondent no....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2011

Devrao S/O Kisan Lad and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-14-2011

Subject : Evidence

Acts : Indian Evidence Act - Section 73; Commission of Enquiry Act, 1952 ; Commission of Enquiry Act

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.J. Dixit And Ors.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. All the petitioners are challenging the directions of the respondent no.1-State of Maharashtra issued vide Government resolution dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 05 2013

Vinod S/O Gopichand Rathod Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Urban Develop ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Feb-05-2013

Subject : Education

R.M. Borde, J. 1 Heard Mr.N.L.Jadhav, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, Mr.S.S.Rathi, learned Counsel for Respondent No.4 and Mr.S.T.Veer, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 and 7 to 12. None...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2008

Prabhakar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-2008

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 294, 313 and 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 506

Reported in : II(2008)DMC493

Advocate for Appellant : N.L. Jadhav, Adv.

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by which the original accused challenges the judgment and order dated 15th January, 2007 rendered by the Additional Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2005

Marathwada Association for Social Services Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 82, 82(1), 82(3), 82(4), 82(5) and 83; National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 - Sections 5(1), 14, 14(1), 15(1) and 32; National Council for Teachers Education (Form of application for recognition, the lime of submission of application, determination of norms and standards for recognition of teachers education from time to time and permission to start new course or training) Regulation, 2002; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR784; 2005(3)MhLj308

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah and ;N.L. Jadhav, Advs. in W.P. No. 7676 of 2004 and ;V.G. Gangapurwala, Adv. holding for ;J.R. Patil, Adv. in W.P. No. 7677 of 2004

M.G. Gaikwad, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, petitions are heard and decided finally.2. These two petitions have been decided by this common judgment as in both petitions point involved and relief claimed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2008

Gulabbai W/O Gopaldas Gujrati Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Sec ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-09-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Consitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR184; 2008(6)MhLj679

Advocate for Appellant : N.L. Jadhav, Adv.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule, heard forthwith.2. The petitioner is the widow of Gopaldas Kanhyalal Gujrati. The late Gopaldas Kanhyalal Gujrati had participated in the Indian Independence Movement and was sentenced for six months by Dharangaon Magistrate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2011

Sangmeshwar Sugar Limited Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Dec-14-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act,1956

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Adv.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard for final disposal by consent of parties. 2. The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to challenge the orders made by Sugar Commissioner in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2002

Mirza Kadir Baig Rasul Baig Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 - Sections 7; Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rules 3(1) and 6

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR672

Advocate for Appellant : V.J. Dixit, Adv.

A.B. Naik, J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner challenges the order passed by the Collector, Parbhani, in File No. 2000-MVN-1-P-CR-5, dated 10-9-2002. In order to appreciate the points involved in this petition, following undisputed facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial