Advanced Search Results
Turner Morrison and Co., Bombay Vs. K.N. Tapuria and Others
Mumbai
Feb-10-1993
Criminal
1993(3)BomCR187; 1993CriLJ3384
K.M. Desai and ;N.K. Thakore, Advs.;B.R. Patil, A.P.P.
1. Should the law Courts play the role of a helpless spectator in a situation where corporate funds are diverted for personal use and criminally misappropriated by persons in control of the management merely because the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindus Videotronics and anr. Vs. Digambar M. Badodkar and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-13-2001
Criminal
Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 - Sections 33, 33(1), 51, 51(1) and 53; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6 and 6(1); Copyright Act - Sections 52A and 52A(2); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Central Excise Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Kerala General Sales-Tax Act
2001ALLMR(Cri)2009
N.K. Thakore, Adv.
S.S. Parkar, J.1. This group of six petitions is filed for quashing the prosecutions lodged against the petitioners under the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 and the Rules made thereunder...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepak Ratanshi Bhatia Vs. Narayan Acharya and anr.
Mumbai
Nov-27-1992
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 362 and 482
1993(1)BomCR635
N.K. Thakore, Adv.
M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This application has been preferred by the National Textile Corporation through its Senior Manager and in substance is for a relief that the earlier judgment of this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajiv Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Oct-28-2005
Criminal
Companies Act; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 14 and 17(4); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 43A and 62; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272, 273 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 43(8), 272, 273 and 420; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006CriLJ581; 2006FAJ135
N.K. Thakore and ;Prakash Naik, Advs.
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioners are the directors of a company called 'Dharampal Satyapal Limited' (for short, 'the said Company') incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, having its main office at Delhi and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarischandra Biyani Vs. Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd.
Mumbai
Oct-11-2005
Banking
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 145, 145(1) and 145(2)
I(2007)BC417; 2006(4)MhLj381
N.K. Thakore, Adv., i/b., ;Prakash Naik, Adv.
V.K. Tahilramani, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant i.e. original accused, learned advocate for respondent i.e. original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.2. The applicant is facing prosecution in Criminal Case No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohanlal Devdanbhai Choksey and ors. Vs. M.P. Mondkar and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-02-1976
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11A, 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11L, 11M, 110, 110(1), 110(2), 110(3), 111, 112, 113, 124 and 126
1988(19)LC180(Bombay)
A.K. Sen, ;S.J. Sorabjee, ;P.A. Mehta and ;N.K. Thakore, Advs.
Kantawala, C.J.1. The firm of Messrs Mohanlal Devdanbhai Choksey (Petitioner No. 1) consisting of three partners, petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 carries on business of sale and purchase of gold and silver bullion. On January 10,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMannath Balchandran Vs. Forbes Forbes Campbell and Co. Ltd., Bombay an ...
Mumbai
Nov-15-1995
Criminal
India Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193, 408, 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 256, 302 and 397
1996CriLJ2131; 1996(2)MhLj932
N.K. Thakore and ;Smt. Sarita Mishra, Advs.
ORDER1. The main petition is directed against the order dated 12th October, 1994, in Criminal Case No. 2/S of 1991 on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 40th Court, Girgaum, Bombay. The criminal application is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Bureau of Investigation, Bank Securities and Fraud Cell Vs. Mu ...
Mumbai
Mar-16-1999
Criminal
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 8; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 9(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 161, 313, 315, 345 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 109, 120-B, 405, 409, 411, 420, 467, 468 477 and 1208; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 10, 74, 76, 78, 105 and 114; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2); Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 19; Reserve Bank of India, 1934 - Sections 45-I; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5, 11(1), 21 and 35; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 234, 235, 240 and 242(1); Constitution of India
1999(3)BomCR189
V.G. Pradhan and ;R.S. Mhamane, Spl. P.P.;D.K. Rai, Asstt. Investigating Officer, ;S.R. Mishra, ;N.K. Thakore, ;Prakash Naik, ;Dinesh Purandare, ;B.N. Dalal and ;A.A. Bhore, Advs., ;H.J. Thacker and ;
ORDERM.S. Rane, J.NATURE AND BACKGROUND OF THIS PROSECUTION:1. The prosecution herein is sequel to security scam which broke out in the mid of the year 1992 in various types of security transactions alleged to be undertaken...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHiten Prasad Dalal and Others Vs. Abhay Dharmasi Narottam and Another
Mumbai
Jul-31-1998
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 243, 313, 315 and 342-A; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 6; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 13(1) and 13(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 409, 411, 467, 468 and 471
1998(5)BomCR822; 1998BomCR(Cri)43
Shirish P. Gupte, ;N.K. Thakore, ;Prakash Naik, ;Ms. Bhadra N. Dalal, ;A.A. Bhore, Advs. and ;Amit Desai, Adv., i/by ;Malvi Ranchhodas & Co.
ORDERM.S. Rane, J.1. Somewhat queer point is raised by the above named accused-applicants, which Court is required to consider, at such a stage of the trial of the above case, when prosecution has concluded its evidence,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarishma Consultant and Vs. Om Prakash Agarwal and
Mumbai
Sep-22-2009
BankingCriminal
Negotiable Instrument Act - Sections 138 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482
2009(6)MhLj1009
N.K. Thakore i/by; Prakash Naik, Advs.
V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. The group of above noted applications filed by original accused persons for quashing of criminal complaint case Under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code is being decided together in as much as identical...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »