Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n k shukla · Page 1 of about 61 results (0.109 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 25 2004

Chandrawanshi K.P. and 9 ors. Vs. National thermal Power Corporation L ... Overruled

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Mar-25-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 51; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227;

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ779CG

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Shukla,; Shailendra Shukla,; Dhirendra Mishra,;

L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. These three writ petitions relate to the same issue. Therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. Writ Petition No. 2072 of 2001 has been filed by ten individual non-executive officials...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2001

Commandant 11th Battalion and ors. Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Mar-27-2001

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Vishesh Sashastra Bal Niyam, 1973 - Rules 34 to 38, 47, 48, 50, 51 and 262 to 275-A; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulations 214, 262, 270 and 270(1); Constitution of India - Article 227; Madhya Pradesh Vishesh Sashastra Bal Adhiniyam, 1968 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 27, 27(1) and 27(2)

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT70(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Shukla, Dy. Adv. General

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to challenge the correctness, validity and propriety of the order dated 18-2-2000 passed in O.A. No. 1207/89...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2005

BadruddIn Quraishy Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Mar-29-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Haj Committee Act, 2002 - Sections 4, 18, 18(1), 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 26(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT64(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Shukla, Sr. Adv. and; Ritu Mishra, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J. 1. The petitioner was a member of the State Legislative Assembly of the State of Chhattisgarh from Bhilai Constituency. He belongs to the National Congress Party. By a Notification dated 15-9-2003 issued under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 14 2001

In Re: V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Dec-14-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 148A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT58(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Party-in-person; Ravindra Srivastava, Adv. General and; N.K. Shukla, Dy. Advocate General

ORDER1. The matter relates to conduct of an advocate regarding submission while making special request for listing a case urgently.2. Shri Tamaskar, in the court slip has mentioned in red ink as under:'If the Court slip...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1999

Smt. BhulIn Dewangan Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-1999

Subject : Election

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 21, 21(1), 21(3), 21(4), 28(3) and 35(3); Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Tatha Up-Sarpanch, Janpad Panchayat Tatha Zila Panchayat Ke President Tatha Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994 - Rule 3(3); Panchayat (Method of Service of notice and document) Rules, 1995 - Rule 3; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act - Sections 56(3); Constitution of India - Article 227; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (President and Vice-Presidents) Election Rules, 1962 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT69

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Shukla, Adv.

ORDERD.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. In the course of deciding this writ petition on merits which was filed to assail the 'No Confidence Motion' passed against the petitioner as elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Koora, Hon'ble Justice Dipak...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2011

Shiv Kumar and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Sep-12-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

(PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)1. In this petition, the petitioners seek a writ/direction to quash the order dated 18th October, 1995 (Annexure P/3) whereby applications were invited from the regular employees working...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2006

Shyamlal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Oct-10-2006

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4743

L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. Accused/appellant-Shyamlal was tried by learned Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur, in Sessions Trial No. 38/2006 for committing the murders of his fa-ther-Raghu Singh, mother Sapdai and sister Suvidha in the intervening night of 22nd/23rd September,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2014

Cement Corporation of India Ltd. Through Its Chairman-cum- Managing Di ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : May-08-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. 1. The short question involved in this appeal is: œWhether the Circular dated 02.09.2002 was applicable to the employees/members of the Petitioner- Sangh, who had opted for voluntary retirement (VR) under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2009

Vishambher Alias Genda Ram Vs. Kaththuram and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Family

Reported in : 2009(5)MPHT51(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dilip Dubey

T.P. Sharma, J.1. By this appeal, the appellant has challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 16-12-91 passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Ambikapur, in Civil Appeal No. 62-A/86, affirming the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1987

income-tax Officer Vs. Samir Builders

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Aug-03-1987

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1987)23ITD570(Ahd.)

1. These appeals, as also many others of the same group which we heard along with these appeals, are directed against the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. Ahmedabad (AAC). The common question involved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial