Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n k patil · Page 1 of about 1,983 results (0.132 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 08 1993

Vijay Mahanthesh Vidyavardhak Sangh Vs. Karnataka University

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-08-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka State Universities Act - Sections 53, 53(2), 53(4), 53(5) and 53(10); University Grant Commission Act - Sections 22 and 23

Reported in : ILR1993KAR1910; 1992(2)KarLJ388

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Patil, Adv.

ORDERVasanthakumar, J.1. Petitioner in this Writ Petition has sought the following reliefs.-a) Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing Annexure-H, dated 20.5.1992 in No. KV VIM (Samyojane) 91-92 700 issued by the first respondent herein.b) Direct...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2007

Smt. C.R. Vijayalakshmi W/O B.L. Naidu and ors. Vs. Bangalore Universi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-12-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2761; 2007(6)KarLJ302;

Advocate for Appellant : Vaishali Hegde, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. Petitioners herein, questioning the correctness of the impugned order dated 12th October 1998 bearing U.O. No. EST : WP No. 171 : 77:86 passed by first respondent vide Annexure C and the impugned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2009

Cement Sales Corporation Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-27-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 30(3), 39(1) and 69

Reported in : (2009)23VST210(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : Vani H., Adv.

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset submitted that, she does not press prayers (a) to (r) sought in the petition for the present and the instant writ petition is confined...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 14 2001

Sri Nandi Basaveshwara Swamy Devaru, Attigere Village, Davanagere Dist ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-14-2001

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 79B and 79B(1)

Reported in : 2002(3)KarLJ669

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Hegde, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Patil, J. 1. With the consent of the learned Counsels appearing for both the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing. 2. The petitioner is assailing the impugned orders in No. RRT. CR. 156/96,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2008

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Mallareddeppa S/O Bhimangouda ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-21-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 10, 10(3), 12(2), 18, 18(1) and 18(3); Land Acquisition Rules - Rule 10B

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1531; 2008(3)KarLJ501; 2008(2)KCCR717; 2008(2)AIRKarR405; AIR2008NOC1347; 2008AIHC2008(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Asha M. Kumbaragerimath, HCGP in C.R.P. No. 58 of 2007 and ;Veeresh B. Patil and ;Chaitanya Kumar, Advs. in C.R.P. No. 59 of 2007

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. Though these matters are posted for orders, with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for both parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing and is disposed of as follows:2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2008

Veerabhadrappa S/O Siddalingappa Shettar (Since Dead by Lrs. Shantawwa ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-17-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 9

Reported in : 2008(4)KarLJ736; 2008(2)KCCR710; 2008(2)AIRKarR513; AIR2008NOC1240; 2008AIHC2059(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : M.B. Naragund and ;Sona Vakkund, Advs.

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. The petitioners, being aggrieved by the order dated 28.2.2004, passed in Misc. Appeal No. 13/1998, by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn), Jamkhandi, dismissing the appeal and confirming the order dated 3.4.1998, passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2009

Marappa and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-15-2009

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1392; 2009(2)KarLJ517:AIR2009NOC2147

Advocate for Appellant : Prakash T. Hebbar, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. The petitioners, assailing the correctness of the impugned order dated 11-6-2008 passed by the First Additional District Judge, Bangalore, on I.A. No. I in M.A. No. 28 of 2005 vide Annexure-A and to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2008

National Education Foundation (a Regd. Trust) Rep. by Its Trustee, Sri ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-04-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6 and 6(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2008Kant111; ILR2008KAR1281; 2008(5)KarLJ43

Advocate for Appellant : Hemanth, Adv. for ;Ashok Haranahalli, Adv.

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. Though this matter is posted for orders, with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing and is disposed of as follows.2. Petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2008

Smt. M. Menaka and anr. Vs. Siddalingaiah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-05-2008

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1697; 2008(4)KLJ151; 2008(2)KCCR1120:2008(3)AIRKarR320:AIR2008NOC2099; 2008(4)Crimes335; 2008(4)CivilLJ401

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Kale and ;Kiran Kumar, Advs.

ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. Petitioners, being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order dated 4th February 2006 in C. Misc. No. 322/2000 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, have presented the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2008

Chikajala Gram Panchayath Vs. the State of Karnataka Revenue Departmen ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-08-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Panchayath Raj Act; Panchayath Raj Rules

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1879; 2008(5)KLJ352; 2008(2)KCCR1082; 2008(3)AIRKarR351; AIR2008NOC2135

Advocate for Appellant : M. Shivaprakash, Adv.

N.K. Patil, J.1. The petitioner-Chikajala Gram Panchayath, Chikajala Village, Jala Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, represented by its Secretary, has sought for a direction to the respondents-authorities to consider the representation submitted by petitioner vide Annexure-J and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial