Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n k pandey · Page 1 of about 92 results (0.117 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2003

Smt. Bhoori Vs. Additional Sub-divisional Magistrate/Election Tribunal ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election of Members, Pradhan and Up-Pradhan) Rules, 1994 - Rules 4(3) and 107

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC849; (2003)2UPLBEC1384

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare, ;N.K. Pandey and ;Sudha Pandey, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, senior advocate, assisted by Sri N. K. Pandey for petitioner and Sri K. A. Ansari and Rajiv Sisodia, advocates for contesting respondent No. 2. With the consent of parties,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2001

Paras Nath Singh Vs. Additional Commissioner (Admn.), Trade Tax, Luckn ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-29-2001

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2721; (2002)1UPLBEC600

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Pandey, Adv.

Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. Heard Sri N.K. Pandey appearing for the petitioner and Sri Rajni Kant Tiwari, learned standing counsel. 2. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and with the consent of the parties, the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2004

Satish Kumar Vs. Additional District Judge and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-10-2004

Subject : ElectionCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats (Election of Pramukhs and Up-Pramukhs and Settlement of Election Disputes) Rules, 1994 - Rules 35, 36, 37 and 40; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), , 1908 - Order 6, Rules 2 and 16 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC666; (2004)3UPLBEC2806

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Pandey and ;Sudha Pandey, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Satish Kumar, seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 17 1999

Brahm Dutt Sharma Vs. Commanding Officer, Ist U.P. Bt., N.C.C. and Oth ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-17-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : National Cadet Corps Rules, 1948 - Rules 22, 28 and 28(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; National Cadet Corps Act, 1948 - Sections 13, 13(2) and (3)

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2452

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Pandey, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. By an order dated 5th September, 1998, the petitioner has been relinquished of his Commission. This order has since been challenged in this writ petition. Mr. N.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2010

Srimati Sarita Devi. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-28-2010

Subject : Election

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Sharma; Mr. N.K. Pandey; Mr. Jai Singh; Ms. Sudha Pandey; Mr. Ramesh Rai; Mr. Akhilesh K. Dwivedi; Mr. Rakesh Prasad; Mr. Dinesh Prasad; Mr. Ghanshyam Singh; Mr. Ravindra Prakash Srivastava; Mr. Ram Singh; Mr. J.P. Mishra. Advs

1. All the matters are connected with each other since common questions are involved therein, as a result whereof we formulate the following points for the purpose of deciding the controversy involved in the present writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2003

Smt. Bhoori Vs. Additional Sub-divisional Officer, Election Tribunal a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-24-2003

Subject : Election

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6 , Rule 16; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC857; (2003)2UPLBEC1035

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Pandey and ;Sudha Pandey, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri N. K. Pandey for petitioner and Sri K. A. Ansari for contesting respondent No. 2.2. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 12.9.2002 passed by the Election Tribunal/Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2005

Uttar Pradeshiya Prathamik Shikahak Sangh Through Its General Secretar ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Societies Registration Act - Sections 3(2), 3A(2) and 25; Uttar Pradesh (Recognized Service Association) Rules, 1979

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC637

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Pandey and ;Sanjay Sharma, Advs.

D.P. Singh, J.1. Pleadings have been exchanged and the counsel for the parties agree that the petition may be finally disposed off under the Rules of the Court.2. Heard Sri N.K. Pandey, for the petitioner and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Mar-24-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this Writ Appeal is to an order made in W.P(MD)No.13613 of 2009, dated 24.02.2010 by which, the Writ Court, while setting aside the proceedings in R.P.No.11/06/D2, dated 10.11.2009 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2016

Surendra Rai and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-12-2016

Subject : Criminal

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 230 of 2009 ----- 1.Surendra Rai 2.Murari Rai 3.Dhrub Rai . . . . . Petitioners versus The State of Jharkhand. . . . . Opp. Party ----- For the Petitioners : M/s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1999

Zamir Ahmad Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-14-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Article9:11 AM 1/30/06 22 and 22(5)

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2261

Advocate for Appellant : N.I. Jafri and D.S. Misra, Advs.

V.K. Chaturvedi, J.1. By means of this Habeas Corpus petition, the petitioner, Zahir Ahmad has challenged his detention order dated 6-4-1999 passed by respondent No. 3, District Magistrate, Rampur under Section 3(2) of the National Security...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial