Advanced Search Results

S.P. Bhatnagar Vs. Indian Oil Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)898; 1994(30)DRJ374

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Kaul,; P.S. Shroff and; A.K. Roy, Advs

D.K. Jain, J.(1) The appetent (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) holding a Civil Engineering Degree from the Stanford university in the Usa got employed as Installation Engineer with the respondent - Indian Oil Corporation Ltd....

Qrg Enterprises and anr. Vs. Surendra Electricals and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1) and 29(5); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : 2007(98)DRJ499; LC2007(3)368

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv.,; Pratibha M. Singh and; Shruti Kakkar

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This Appeal is directed against the Order of the learned Single Judge passed on 26.4.2005 whereby the application of the Plaintiffs'/Appellants for interim relief had been rejected. The Suit had been filed by...

Naresh Khetrapal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Prisons Act - Sections 30 and 56; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT183

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Singhvi,; N.K. Kaul, Sr. Advs.,; Priya Kumar and;

Mukul Mudgal, J.CM No. 12766/20081. For the reasons recorded in the application for amendment and in view of fact that the Petitioner was never told that a vigilance enquiry was pending against him, the application for...

interglobe Aviation Limited Vs the Secretary Competition Commission of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - sections 11(1), 33(1)(d),66 ; Competition Act, 2002 (`CA'). - sections 26(1),66(1), 66(3), 66(4), 66(5)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.K. Kaul, Mr. Amit Kapur, Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Ponnam Verma, Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of the local news papers be allowed to see the order?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether the order should be reported in the Digest? ORDER1. Both writ petitions challenge...

S.P. Gupta and ors. Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Company Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 242, 244, 397, 398, 621(1A), 624, 624A, 624B and 630; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 156, 157, 196A(2), 197 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 406, 409, 420, 424, 467, 467 and 477; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas402(Delhi); 119(2005)DLT214; [2005]61SCL121(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. and; Anil Sharma, Adv

O.P. Dwivedi, J. 1. The moot point for consideration in this writ petition is whether recourse to investigation in the affairs of company under Section 235 to 242 of the Company Act is the only way...

Span Diagnostic Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Design and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 25(3), 25(4), 27, 28, 29(2), 29(3), 37, 41, 42, 47, 51, 54, 57, 59 to 63, 66, 69(3), 74, 78, 84(1) to 84(5), 85, 86, 88, 88(3), 89, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 116, 116(1), 116(2), 117, 117A, 117A(2), 117G and 158; Patents Amendment Act, 2002 - Sections 1(2), 18 and 47; Patents Amendment Act, 2005 - Sections 1(1), 1(2), 23, 60 and 61; Patents Amendment Act, 1999

Reported in : LC2009(1)22; 2008(37)PTC56(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv.,; Sagar Chandra and; Anu Bagai, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. The question which I am called upon to answer, for the moment, in the instant appeals is:Whether the appeals are maintainable and if yes, whether the same require to be transmitted to the...

Indian Institute of Banking and Finance Vs Mukul Srivastava

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Section 2(h),(d)(ii)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.K. Kaul, S,r, Mr. Sanjay Bhatt , Mr. Kishan Rawat, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes 1.The short question is...

Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Ot ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Section 7

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.K. Kaul; Mr. Suman Doval; Mr. Sumit Babbar, Advs.

1. The Petitioner seeks a direction to the Director General, Directorate of Supplies & Disposal (`DGS&D;) (Respondent No.2) and the Jute Commissioner, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India at Kolkata (Respondent No.4) to issue production control...

Denel (Proprietary) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationBanking

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 17

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv.,; Ravinder Singhania,; Tarun Dua a

Valmiki J. Mehta, J.1. The aforesaid three petitions are being disposed of by this common order inasmuch as the facts of the three cases are more or less similar. Wherever the need arises to refer to...

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Rachana Srivastava

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 14874 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(C)No.19445 of 2004) REPORTABLE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. ... APPELLANTS VERSUS KUMAON STONE CRUSHER ... RESPONDENT...