Advanced Search Results
Vasant Investment Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Company Law Board and Others
Mumbai
Dec-16-1998
Company
Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10, 43-A, 82, 108, 109, 110, 111 and 155; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Articles 20, 40 and 52; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 38 and 100; Indian Companies Act, 1913
AIR1999Bom207; 1999(1)ALLMR362; 1999(2)BomCR254a; (1999)1BOMLR916; [2000]102CompCas421(Bom)
N.H. Seervai and ;Pooniwala Advs. i/by ;Fedral & ;Rashmikant
ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. The legality and correctness of the order dated 22-5-1992 passed by the Company Law Board. Western Region Bench, Bombay is subject matter of challenge in this appeal filed under section 10(f) of Companies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShriyam Broking Intermediary Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Indi ...
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Feb-19-2008
Company
(2008)84SCL9SAT
Shri. N.H. Seervai
1. Whether the appellant is entitled to exemption from payment of registration fee for the period for which one D.D. Chaturvedi (Chaturvedi) a member of the Calcutta Stock Exchange (CSE) and a registered stock broker had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDiamond Jubilee High School Through Its Principal and Another Vs. Stat ...
Mumbai
Jul-05-2013
Education
M.S. Sonak, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable with the consent of all the parties forthwith. 2. The petitioners challenge the order dated 27th November, 2012 passed by the Principal Secretary (S.E.A.S.D.) directing the refund...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Machhindra Pandurang Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Apr-13-1989
Labour and Industrial
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 161, 323, 324, 341, 448, 504 and 506; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rule 4(1)
1989(3)BomCR501; (1989)IILLJ353Bom; 1989MhLJ505
1. The petitioner was working as Minimum Wage Inspector (Agriculture). On 16th of October 1986 the petitioner was apprehended by the Anti-Corruption Bureau for accepting illegal gratification from one E. S. Pattan Shetti of Gandhinglaj. Thereafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-19-1999
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12
[2002]109CompCas18(Bom)
F.S. Nariman, Senior Adv., ;I.M. Chagla, ;Aspi Chinoy and ;J.P. Avasia, Advs., i/b., ;Bachibai Munim and Co. in Suit No. 3910 of 1997
H.L. Gokhale, J.1. The notices of motion in Suit No. 3910 of 1997 seek to challenge the legality and validity of substantial acquisitions of shares by defendants Nos. 1 to 11 in defendant No. 12-company allegedly...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKetan Parekh Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Jul-14-2006
Land Acquisition
1. This order will dispose of a bunch of 9 Appeals nos. 2 to 10 of 2004 in which common questions of law and fact arise. Since arguments were addressed in Appeal no. 2 of 2004...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal L. Raheja of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant and Vs. Vijay B. Raheja o ...
Mumbai
Apr-25-2007
Company
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(3) and 7; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 82, 88 and 94; Specific Relief Act; Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2
2007(4)BomCR288
Aspi Chinoy, ;Janak Dwarkadas and ;P.K. Samdani, Sr. Advs. and ;P.K. Shroff, ;Subodh Joshi and ;Radhika Kalpatrai, Advs., i/b., Parimal K. Shroff and Co.
D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. This appeal arises out of an order passed by a Learned Single Judge on 14th March 2005 while disposing of a Motion for interim relief in the suit. The Plaintiffs are in appeal....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRai Bahadur Gujarmal Modi and Bros. Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated ...
Mumbai
Sep-22-2006
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10, 10(2) and 84(4); Companies (Issue of Share Certificates) Rules, 1960
2006(6)BomCR662; [2008]143CompCas156(Bom); [2006]72SCL251(Bom)
S.H. Doctor, Sr. Counsel, ;M.S. Doctor and ;Kalpesh Joshi, Advs., i/b., Malvi Ranchoddas & Co.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. We heard Mr. S.H. Doctor, the senior counsel for the Appellant; Mr. V.R. Dhond, the counsel for Respondent No. 1-Company and Mr. N.H. Seervai, the senior counsel for the Respondent No. 2. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRare (H) Minerals Private Limited Vs. the Union of India and Others
Mumbai Nagpur
Sep-17-2013
Land Acquisition
Shri. A. A. Naik
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the Notification (Revised Guidelines for Making Selection of Applicants for Grant of Off-shore Exploration Licence) issued on 29th December 2010. Considering the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskICICI Bank Limited and Another Vs. United Breweries (Holdings) Limited ...
Mumbai
Dec-03-2015
Service Tax
SUMMARY OF THE JUDGMENT: The Kingfisher Airlines Limited â“ original Defendant No.3, who is a proforma Defendant against whom no reliefs are claimed by the original Plaintiffs, had taken financial assistance from large number of Financial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »