Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n h seervai · Page 1 of about 70 results (0.072 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 16 1998

Vasant Investment Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Company Law Board and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-16-1998

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10, 43-A, 82, 108, 109, 110, 111 and 155; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Articles 20, 40 and 52; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 38 and 100; Indian Companies Act, 1913

Reported in : AIR1999Bom207; 1999(1)ALLMR362; 1999(2)BomCR254a; (1999)1BOMLR916; [2000]102CompCas421(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : N.H. Seervai and ;Pooniwala Advs. i/by ;Fedral & ;Rashmikant

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. The legality and correctness of the order dated 22-5-1992 passed by the Company Law Board. Western Region Bench, Bombay is subject matter of challenge in this appeal filed under section 10(f) of Companies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2008

Shriyam Broking Intermediary Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Indi ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Feb-19-2008

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2008)84SCL9SAT

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. N.H. Seervai

1. Whether the appellant is entitled to exemption from payment of registration fee for the period for which one D.D. Chaturvedi (Chaturvedi) a member of the Calcutta Stock Exchange (CSE) and a registered stock broker had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2013

Diamond Jubilee High School Through Its Principal and Another Vs. Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-05-2013

Subject : Education

M.S. Sonak, J. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable with the consent of all the parties forthwith. 2. The petitioners challenge the order dated 27th November, 2012 passed by the Principal Secretary (S.E.A.S.D.) directing the refund...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 13 1989

Machhindra Pandurang Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 161, 323, 324, 341, 448, 504 and 506; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rule 4(1)

Reported in : 1989(3)BomCR501; (1989)IILLJ353Bom; 1989MhLJ505

1. The petitioner was working as Minimum Wage Inspector (Agriculture). On 16th of October 1986 the petitioner was apprehended by the Anti-Corruption Bureau for accepting illegal gratification from one E. S. Pattan Shetti of Gandhinglaj. Thereafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1999

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 87, 111 and 111A; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11, 11B, 15I, 15Y and 20A; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 33, 37, 39; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 10, 11 and 12

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman, Senior Adv., ;I.M. Chagla, ;Aspi Chinoy and ;J.P. Avasia, Advs., i/b., ;Bachibai Munim and Co. in Suit No. 3910 of 1997

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. The notices of motion in Suit No. 3910 of 1997 seek to challenge the legality and validity of substantial acquisitions of shares by defendants Nos. 1 to 11 in defendant No. 12-company allegedly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2006

Ketan Parekh Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jul-14-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This order will dispose of a bunch of 9 Appeals nos. 2 to 10 of 2004 in which common questions of law and fact arise. Since arguments were addressed in Appeal no. 2 of 2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2007

Gopal L. Raheja of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant and Vs. Vijay B. Raheja o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-2007

Subject : Company

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(3) and 7; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 82, 88 and 94; Specific Relief Act; Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR288

Advocate for Appellant : Aspi Chinoy, ;Janak Dwarkadas and ;P.K. Samdani, Sr. Advs. and ;P.K. Shroff, ;Subodh Joshi and ;Radhika Kalpatrai, Advs., i/b., Parimal K. Shroff and Co.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. This appeal arises out of an order passed by a Learned Single Judge on 14th March 2005 while disposing of a Motion for interim relief in the suit. The Plaintiffs are in appeal....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2006

Rai Bahadur Gujarmal Modi and Bros. Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 10, 10(2) and 84(4); Companies (Issue of Share Certificates) Rules, 1960

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR662; [2008]143CompCas156(Bom); [2006]72SCL251(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.H. Doctor, Sr. Counsel, ;M.S. Doctor and ;Kalpesh Joshi, Advs., i/b., Malvi Ranchoddas & Co.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. We heard Mr. S.H. Doctor, the senior counsel for the Appellant; Mr. V.R. Dhond, the counsel for Respondent No. 1-Company and Mr. N.H. Seervai, the senior counsel for the Respondent No. 2. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2013

Rare (H) Minerals Private Limited Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-17-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A. A. Naik

Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the Notification (Revised Guidelines for Making Selection of Applicants for Grant of Off-shore Exploration Licence) issued on 29th December 2010. Considering the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

ICICI Bank Limited and Another Vs. United Breweries (Holdings) Limited ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Service Tax

SUMMARY OF THE JUDGMENT: The Kingfisher Airlines Limited â“ original Defendant No.3, who is a proforma Defendant against whom no reliefs are claimed by the original Plaintiffs, had taken financial assistance from large number of Financial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial