Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n ganapathy · Page 1 of about 79 results (0.095 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 09 1992

D. Veerasekaran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the D.S.P. 'Q' Branch ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2168; (1992)IMLJ24

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. Ganapathy, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition coming on for orders on Friday, the 3rd and Monday the 6th days of January, 1992, upon perusing the petition and the orders of the Designated Court under T.A.D.A. Act and the records...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1993

Engine Valves Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-06-1993

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 6(1A), 8, 8(2) and (2A) and 9(1); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 21A

Reported in : 1993(43)ECC159

Advocate for Appellant : C. Natarajan,;A.C. Muthanna and;S.V. Subramaniam, Senior Counsels,;R.L. Ramani,;N. Ganapathi and;P.S. Janarthana Raja, Advs.

Raju, J.1. The above batch of writ petitions involve the interpretation of the scope of section 8(2-A) and section 8(2)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, hereinafter referred to as 'the Central Act' and more...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 1989

R. Abdul Azeez Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-13-1989

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 12 and 12(3)

Reported in : (1990)IILLJ12Mad

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganapathy, Adv. for Pathy and ;Sundaram, Adv.

S. Mohan, Offg. C.J.1. The case before us illustrates how persons wielding judicial authority are sometimes subjected to rigorous tests; onerous enough to be engaged in the discharge of judicial functions, but if those persons are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 29 1991

Mahaboob Batcha Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-1991

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3050

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganapathy of M/s. Pathy, Adv., ;Sundaram and ;R. Jayaseelan, Advs.

ORDER1. This Criminal Revision is by the accused in C.C. 85/84 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tiruchirapalli, challenging his conviction for an offence under section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1986

Govindarajulu and Etc. Vs. Assistant Divisional Engineer,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-1986

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1960 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1988Mad188; (1987)IIMLJ243

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganapathy, Adv. for ;G. Subrarnaniam and G. Devadoss, Advs., ;Pathy, Sundaram, V. Paiakrishrian, K. Prabakarati and B. Lakshminarayana Reddy, Advs.

ORDER1. Petitionr in W.P. No. 3573 of 1981 clains to be the owner of premises No.41. south Fort Street, Vridhachalam and that it is worth Rso.150 lakhs. He claims as follows :On 2-6-1981, he received an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1988

British Physical Laboratories India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Government of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-1988

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1988(37)ELT344(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganapathy, Adv. for ;S. Venkataraman and Jyoti-Balasundaram, Advs.

Swamikkannu, J.1. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying that In the circumstances stated therein, and in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 1991

Ramalingam Vs. the District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur Dist. and Other ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-19-1991

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record of Tenancy Rights Act, 1969 - Sections 3(2) and 16-A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record of Tenancy Rights Act, 1968

Reported in : AIR1992Mad97

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganapathy, Adv.

ORDERRaju, J.1. The above appeal has been filed against the order of a learned single Judge dated 9-3-1988 whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellant seeking to quash the order of the first respondent dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1987

S.M.A. Siddique Vs. Government of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-16-1987

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947; Motor Vehicles Act

Reported in : 1989(42)ELT541(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramaswami, Adv. for N. Ganapathy, ;M.I. Meerasahib and ;Thirumoorthy, Advs.

ORDER1. This Writ Petition coming on for hearing on this day upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof the Order of the High Court, dated 23-1-1981 and made herein the records relating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2016

The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Education ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-2016

Subject : Education

(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter of Patents Act against the order dated 21.11.2014 in W.P.No.23713 of 2014) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1994

T. Suthendraraja and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-09-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(1), 39, 39A, 227 and 227(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 303, 304 and 304(2); Tada - Sections 15

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1496

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganpathi for M/s. P.I. Thirumoorthy, ;S. Kumaradevan and ;S. Doraisamy, Advs.

Arunachalam, J.1. An unfortunate episode of non-reconciliation between the defence lawyers engaged as State Brief Counsel and the State, on the quantum of fees payable to those counsel, has led to a grinding belt, of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial