Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n dinakar · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 09 1994

T. Suthendraraja and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-09-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(1), 39, 39A, 227 and 227(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 303, 304 and 304(2); Tada - Sections 15

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1496

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganpathi for M/s. P.I. Thirumoorthy, ;S. Kumaradevan and ;S. Doraisamy, Advs.

Arunachalam, J.1. An unfortunate episode of non-reconciliation between the defence lawyers engaged as State Brief Counsel and the State, on the quantum of fees payable to those counsel, has led to a grinding belt, of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1992

Anthony and Others Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1828

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai and ;Mr. Krishnan, Sr. Counsels and ;Mr. Dinakar, Adv.

Arunachalam, J.1. 11th June, 1982, was a black day in the annals of Ayyapuram Village, a hamlet of Puliyangudi. Communal disharmony, between muslims and harijans in a group, opposed to caste Hindus, had led to murder,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1991

M/S Elegant Garments Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ799Mad; (1991)IIMLJ522

ORDER1. W.M.P. No. 2760 of 1991 was filed by the petitioner in W.P. No. 2428 of 1986 pending before this Court for an order of interim injunction restraining the first respondent or his agents from demanding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 09 1982

In Re: Duraisingam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-1982

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 83 and 395(2)

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1765

Advocate for Appellant : N. Dinakar, Govt. Adv.

Natarajan, J.1. A reference having been made by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, under S. 395(2) of the Criminal P.C., the reference has been posted before us for orders. 2. Notice was given...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1989

In Re: Arumugham

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173 and 313; Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1430

Advocate for Appellant : T.G. Jeyakumar, Adv.;N. Dinakar, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Janarthanam, J.1. The accused aggrieved by the conviction and sentence has come forward with this appeal. 2. The brief facts are :- (i) The accused is a resident of Amarapoondi Melakottai village which is 12 k.m....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1989

In Re: Jeyaseelan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 307, 320, 323, 324, 326 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173 and 313

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2559

Advocate for Appellant : N. Natarajan, Adv. for Bobblie, Adv., ;R. Gothandaraman and ;K.J. Ayyappan, Advs.;N. Dinakar, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Janarthanam, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27-8-1984 of the Court of Session, Madurai North Division at Dindigul in Sessions Case No. 64 of 1984. 2. It arises from these facts : (a)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 1994

Pitchaimani and Others Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-27-1994

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1995(1)ALT(Cri)114; 1994CriLJ2606

Advocate for Appellant : N. Dinakar for M/s. K.R. Thiagarajan, Adv., ;S. Shaul Hameed and ;S. Vellusamy, Advs.

Thangamani, J. 1. Appellants are accused 1 to 3 in S.C. No. 110 of 1986 on the file of learned Sessions Judge, Tirunalveli. They were charged as under on the allegation that on account of prior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2001

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Hulasi Devi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-17-2001

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147 and 149

Reported in : II(2003)ACC103; 2002ACJ2082; 2002(4)WLN88

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Lunkar, Adv.

Panwar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 15th Feb., 1994 passed by Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Balotra (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') whereby the Tribunal passed an award of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2009

Sri. Jayaprakash Shetty Son of Sri Gopala Shetty Vs. the Union of Indi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-16-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 41 and 42

Advocate for Appellant : Subramanya Bhat, Adv. for Subba Rao and company

ORDERAravind Kumar, J.1. 2nd respondent Bank introduced a Scheme called 'Vijaya Bank (employees) Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2000 as per Circular No. 231/2000 dated 23-11-2000 which is produced at Annexure-'A'. Petitioner No. 8 who was working as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2010

K. Sulochana Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police Vigilance and A ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 55; ;Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 7, 8, 120, 420, 467 and 468; ;Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - Section 5; ;Bombay Beggars Act, 1945 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 23(1) and 23(2); ;Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 55, 56 and 122; ;Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Section 2; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 186

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ashok Kumar, Sr. Counsel for; S. Palanivelayutham, Adv.

C.T. Selvam, J.1. These appeals arise against the Judgment passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Special Judge, Nagercoil in S.C. No. 1 of 1991 dated 31.01.2002.2. Originally there were 9 accused in the case and of them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial