Advanced Search Results

Raj Kumar Bajaj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rule 443; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Goswami, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. The petitioner, namely, Shri Raj Kumar Bajaj, was served with a Notice, dated 6-6-2000, issued by the respondents directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 46.680/-, which was claimed to be...

Daler Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Advocate for Appellant : T.N. Srinivasna, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. Heard Mr. T. N. Srinivasna, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs. N. D. Sharma, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel, appearing for the respondents.2. By order, dated 27.8.2004, passed in this writ petition,...

Madanlal Mahawar and ors. Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer, Central Sect ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1965]16STC1071(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Roy, Adv.

Banerjee, J.1. At all periods material for the purpose of this Rule, the petitioners, who are three in number, and one Saraswati Mahawar used to carry on business in co-partnership under the firm name Madanlal Gajanand,...

Sudershan Doger Vs. Managing Director, H.P. Small Scale Industries Exp ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(2)ShimLC400

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. The husband of the petitioner was working as General Manager with the respondent No. 1-Corporation. He retired on 31.5.1991. The retiral benefits though were initially released to the petitioner, but were withheld subsequently.2....

N.D. Sharma Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Consumer

Mr. Justice J.M. Malik, Presiding Member: 1. Shri N.D. Sharma, the petitioner, who is an Advocate, and his wife, Late Smt. Narindra Sharma, had a joint account with Head Post Master, Head Post Office, Mandi, District...

Om Prakash Awasthi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2374

Shashi Kant Gupta, J.1. Writ Petition No. 60991 of 2006, O.P. Awasthi v. State of U.P. and Ors. inter alia, has been filed for quashing the appointment letters dated 18.5.2006 and 14.2.2006 issued in favour of...

Manu Ram Das Vs. Assam Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Fisheries Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886 - Regulation 156; Fishery Rules - Rule 15

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Bhuyan, N.D. Sharma, U. Bhuyan and S.M. Das Bhuyan, Advs.

D.N. Choudhury, J.1. The legality and validity of the order/communication dated 17-4-99, selecting the respondent No. 4. Tiken Das, for management of Charan Meen Mahal, is the subject-matter of this proceeding which arises in the following...

The Union of India (Uoi) Through the Chief Engineer and the Commander ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR346; 2006(6)MhLj703

Advocate for Appellant : R. Shetty and ;R.C. Master, Adv., i/b., T. C. Kaushik, Adv., ;R.R. Shetty and ;N. D. Sharma, Advs., i/b., T.C. Kaushik, Adv.

1. Rule in both the Petitioners. Heard forthwith. As the issue involved in these petitioners are common, they are being disposed off by a common order. 2. The Petitioners herein had invited applications for the post...

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs Vs. Ashish Vasantrao Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 76 and 80

Reported in : 2008[10]STR5

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Bharucha, ;N.D. Sharma, ;H.P. Chaturvedi and ;S.D. Bhosale, Advs.

ORDER1. Revenue is in appeal against the order of CESTAT dated 15-2-2006 2006 (3) S.T.R. 184 . By that order, for the reasons set out in para 4, the Learned Tribunal considered the power conferred on...

In Re: Imp Powers Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394, 442, 443, 446, 529A and 537; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 17(1), 18, 19(19) and 34; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : IV(2008)BC183; 2007(4)BomCR761; [2008]142CompCas481(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Chirag Balsara, Adv., i/b., ;Prashant Pandit, Adv.;N.D. Sharma and ;Bharti Mahant, Advs.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. In this proceeding, the consent of the court is sought to a scheme of an arrangement in exercise of powers conferred by Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. As on...