Advanced Search Results
Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-05-1991
Service
Chartered Accountants Act
1991Supp(2)SCC12
S. Ranganathan,; S.C. Agrawal and; N.D. Ojha, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent 3 who is the affected person and we proceed to dispose of the appeal.3. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRudra Pal Singh Vs. Ram Pal Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-28-1971
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 97 - Order 22, Rule 12; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 - Sections 20; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 49
AIR1972All67
N.D. Ojha, Adv.
ORDERR.B. Misra, J.1. These are two connectedpetitions under Article 226 of the Constitution. They arise out of a consolidation matter. As common questions of fact and law are involved in these writ petitions, it will be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamid HusaIn Vs. Ram Naresh Mallah and ors.
Allahabad
May-14-1963
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 21(1)
AIR1965All221
G.P. Bhargava and ;N.D. Ojha, Advs.
Mithan Lal, J. 1. The following question has been referred by a learned single Judge to a Division Bench. 'Whether a mortgagee under a void mortgage of an occupancy holding acquires the status of an asami...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ram Swarup Vs. Mahabir Prasad and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-11-1968
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 97, 97(1), 97(2) and 99
AIR1969All440
N.D. Ojha and ;R.N. Pandey, Advs.
ORDERJ.N. Takru, J.1. This is an objector's application in revision against an order of the learned 3rd Addl. Munsif, Allahabad, rejecting his objection.2. The brief facts, necessary for appreciating the point in controversy, are as follows;A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu and ors. Vs. Bohre Ram Ratan and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-12-1965
Civil
Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
AIR1967All264
N.D. Ojha, Adv.
S.S. Dhavan, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's second appeal from the decree of the Addl. Civil Judge of Mathura dismissing their suit for an injunction to restrain the defendant-respondent Ram Ratan from interfering with their...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.S. Vasudavan Nair Vs. Director of Vikram Sarabhai Space Center and O ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-08-1988
Service
1988Supp(1)SCC795
E.S. Venkataramiah; K.N. Singh; N.D. Ojha, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the special facts and circumstances of this case we feel that the appellant should not have been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner, Sales Tax, U.P. Vs. Arun Industries
Supreme Court of India
Jan-20-1988
Sales Tax
1988Supp(1)SCC524; 1988(70)STC1
K.N. Singh,; M.P. Thakkar and; N.D. Ojha, JJ.1. Special leave granted2. Heard learned counsel for both the sides. An important question as regards the coverage of the Notification dated March 31, 1982 granting exemption from tax...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKashmir Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Oct-05-1988
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 302
1990Supp(1)SCC133
B.C. Ray and; N.D. Ojha, JJ.1. After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find that there is any infirmity in appraisal of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Shakoor and anr. Vs. Shakura Begum (Now Dead) Through Lrs.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-09-1989
Limitation
Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 16 Rules 1, 2, 3, 4
1989Supp(2)SCC510
E.S. Venkataramiah and; N.D. Ojha, JJ.1. We are surprised to find that a number of special leave petitions which are barred by time, according to the limitation report put up by the Registry, are being assigned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChannaveerappa Gouda Vs. Land Acquisition Officer
Supreme Court of India
Apr-12-1989
Property
(1989)3SCC581
E.S. Venkataramiah,; Kuldip Singh and; N.D. Ojha, JJ..1. The only question which arises for consideration is whether the valuation of the garden land measuring 2 acres and 15 gunthas is proper or not. It is not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »