Advanced Search Results
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Mt. Kala and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Feb-08-1957
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 360, 361, 363, 366, 497 and 498; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35, 45, 101 to 104 and 133; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417 and 423
AIR1957HP42,1957CriLJ847
N.D. Gupta, Govt. Adv.
Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. The four respondents were charged with offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366, I. P. C., in the Court of Mr. Hardayal, Magistrate first class, exercising Section 30 powers, Bilaspur. The learned Magistrate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Krishnu Mal
Himachal Pradesh
Mar-25-1955
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115 - Order 41, Rules 23, 25 and 27
N.D. Gupta and; D.R. Auluwalia, Advs.
ORDERRamabhadran, J.C. 1. This was originally admitted as a second appeal, but, for reasons stated in this Court's order.dated 21-12-1954, it was held that no second appeal lies in this case. At the request of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Puran Chand
Himachal Pradesh
Dec-04-1954
Criminal
Police Act, 1861 - Section 29; ;Punjab Police Rules - Rule 17.1; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 342
1955CriLJ947
N.D. Gupta, Govt. Adv.
ORDER8. I allow the appeal, set aside the order of the Court below, convict the respondent, Puran Chand, of an offence under Section 29, Police Act, and sentence him to imprisonment till the rising of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Vs. Kishan Dayal
Himachal Pradesh
Jan-15-1952
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34 and 45; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 170(1), 423(1) and 540
AIR1952HP46
N.D. Gupta, Govt. Adv.
Chowdhry, J.C. 1. These are two Government appeals under Section 417, Criminal P. C., against the acquittal of Kishan Dayal by a first class Magistrate of Bilaspur of offences punishable under Sections 409 and 477A, I....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradeep S/O Domaji Bhanose and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Sep-13-2002
Criminal
Collierty Control Order, 1945; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7
2003BomCR(Cri)706; 2003(1)MhLj40
M.S. Gupta, Adv.
R.K. Batta, J.1. In all these applications, the applicants have been prosecuted under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Clauses 12B and 12E of Colliery Control Order, 1945. In all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask66 Rcc (Graf) 21m Task Force Vs. Smt. Geeta Gupta and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-29-1989
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A
1990ACJ370; (1990)97PLR330
Ashok Bhan, Sr. Adv. and; R.K. Garg, Adv.
S.S. Sodhi, J.1. The matter her concerns the award of Rs. 4,32,000/- as. compensation to the mother, widow and children of Sqn. Ldr. N. D. Gupta, who was run over and killed by a military, truck....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayshree Oza Vs. Rakesh Mohan and ors.
Delhi
Apr-29-1998
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 343, 344, 345-A and 347-A
1998IVAD(Delhi)770; 74(1998)DLT11; 1998(46)DRJ582
Mr. Rakesh Luthra, Sr.Adv.,; Ms. Meera Kapoor and ; Ms. Puj
J.B. Goel, J.1. The plaintiff seeks an injunction in this suit. It is alleged that she is the owner of the premises on the second floor of property No. B-107, defense Colony, New Delhi which she...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Kumar Gupta and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Apr-15-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 283(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471
[2008]144CompCas319(Mad)
Satish Parasaran, Adv.
M. Jeyapaul, J.1. The petition is filed seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in FIR No. 696 of 2007 dated November 1, 2007, on the file of the respondent police.2. The sum and substance of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBipal Lal Vs. Dass
Himachal Pradesh
May-04-1961
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 42 - Order 21, Rule 28
AIR1962HP14
Mohinder Lal, Adv.
C.B. Capoor, J.C.1. This appeal by the decree-holder is directed against an order of Shri N.D. Gupta, the then Additional Subordinate Judge Mandi whereby on a preliminary objection raised by the appellant it was held that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Gupta, and ors. Vs. the Corporation of Chennai, and ors.
Chennai
Apr-01-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Sections 92(1), 92 ; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 108(j) ; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 50, 80 ;
Mr. T.R.Rajagopalan, Adv.
1. One of the reminiscences of the colonial past, still standing as an archaeological monument in the heart of Chennai, is the Victoria Public Hall, off Poonamallee High Road near Central Railway Station. History shows that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›