Advanced Search Results

Radhey Sham Garg Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi,

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32 and 226

Reported in : 2006(91)DRJ365

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Mishra, Sr. Adv. and; Rajeev Sharma, Adv

J.M. Malik, J.1. Two important points arise for the consideration of this Court, firstly, whether the relief should be granted to the petitioner after the lapse of 15-16 years and secondly, whether the petitioner has any...

Himta Ram Vs. Mani Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991WLN(UC)123

B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for restoration of the miscellaneous petition No. 267/88 which was dismissed in default on January 11, 1988.2. A bus No....

Hemant Kumar Swamy, Under Dy. Chief Material Manager, Delhi and Anothe ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

G. George Paracken, Member (J). 1. Both these Original Applications are identical and they are being heard and disposed of by this common order. 2. The Applicants are aggrieved by the impugned Office Order No.190 dated...

A.M. Attar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Public Premises Eviction Act; Pension Act, 1871; Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 - Rules 4(2), 8, 15, 15(3) and 15(4); Railway Pension Rules - Rule 323

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR839; 2006(4)MhLj228

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Karkera, Adv.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioner was working as a Guard in Central Railway. The petitioner was allotted quarters at Byculla, Mumbai. The petitioner retired from services on 28-2-1997 on superannuation. Whilst petitioner was in service, the...

Super Rubber Enterprises Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245F(2), 276C and 277

Reported in : (1995)129CTR(Del)421; [1995]215ITR49(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Chawla, Adv

Vijender Jain, J.1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner for quashing the proceedings based on the criminal complaint dated March 11, 1991, filed against the petitioner-firm and its partners, namely, Satish Chawla, B. L....

Maina Devi Vs. Jaswant Singh (deceased by L.R's)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 146 - Order 21, Rule 16

Reported in : AIR1989Raj23

Advocate for Appellant : Satish Sharma, Adv.

ORDERN.C. Sharma, J.1. Heard Mr. Satish Sharma learned counsel for the petitioner.2. The only argument advanced by Mr. Satish Sharma was that the decree in question was passed in favour of Jaswant Singh who was the...

Daljeet Singh Alias Baljeet Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN55

N.C. Sharma, J.1. The Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary I have gone through the case diary. It appears that as back as on March 2, 1988, on the First Information Report lodged by Gurdeo...

Dinesh Chander Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN159

S.M. Jain, J.1. This revision has been filed by Dinesh Chander again-at the order of the Additional District Magistrate, Udaipur City, Udaipur, dated August 17, 1988 directing attachment of the shop (Garrage) situate at 16 Bhamashah...

Jai Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)257

N.C. Sharma, J.1. Heard Mr. Narendra Saraswat and learned public prosecutor. Non-petitioners Nos. 2 to 5 are absent despite service. It is clear from the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 20th Oct, 1987 sent...

Darbara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1989WLN(UC)61

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Dhankhar

N.C. Sharma, J.1. Heard, Shri Dhankhar, counsel for the petitioner and Shri Lokesh Sharma, Public Prosecutor for the State.2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bharatpur has held the petitioner guilty for the offence under Section 3/25 of...