Advanced Search Results
Mahesh Dutt Tewari Vs. Senior Superintendent of Police, Lucknow and or ...
Allahabad
Nov-24-1959
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2)
AIR1961All122; [1961(2)FLR454]; (1961)ILLJ431All
N. Banerji, Adv.
ORDERJagdish Sahai, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a constable in the Police Force of this State. In 1942 he was promoted to, the rank of Naik Constable and in 1945 to that of a Head...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSirur Municipality, (Ghodnadi) District Poona Vs. the Workmen, Sirur M ...
Mumbai
Apr-14-1960
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(14)
AIR1961Bom75; (1960)62BOMLR965; ILR1961Bom415; (1960)IILLJ657Bom
J.R. Lalit, Adv.
V.S. Desai, J.1. This is an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Award Part I made by the opponent No. 2, as the Industrial Tribunal of Bombay, in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCorporation of City of Nagpur Vs. N.H. Mujumdar and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-11-1957
Labour and Industrial
Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947 - Sections 2(10), 2(11), 2(12), 2(13), 2(14) and 39; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 39; Constitution of India - Article 226; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 59(2)
AIR1958Bom231; (1958)60BOMLR180; ILR1958Bom493
M.N. Phadke, Adv.
Mudholkar, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing the award made by the State Industrial Court at Nagpur on 3rd June 1957,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dhondiba Parshuram Kakade Vs. Shri Someshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ...
Mumbai
Dec-06-1974
Trusts and Societies
(1979)81BOMLR31
Lentin, J.1. Both these petitions are filed to set aside the order, dated February 16, 1974 passed by the Collector of 'Poona, viz. the respondent No. 2, directing the deletion of the names of the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Union of Commercial Employees and anr. Vs. Meher M.R. and ors ...
Mumbai
Nov-20-1958
ArbitrationLabour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 12(5), 25FF and 25FFF
(1959)61BOMLR642; (1959)IILLJ38Bom
Chainani, Ag. C.J. 1. Respondents 2, 3 and 4 were partners in a firm of solicitors, Pereira Fazalbhoy and Company. Originally there were three partners, Pereira, Amin and Fazalbhoy. A partnership deed between them was executed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Hospital Mazdoor Sabha Vs. the State of Bombay
Mumbai
Apr-05-1956
Labour and Industrial
(1956)58BOMLR769
M.C. Chagla, C.J.1. The petitioners Nos. 2 and 8 were employed in the J.J. Group of Hospitals as Ward-servants and their services were terminated, in the case of petitioner No. 2 from November 1, 1954, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Range Officer and Another Munnar Tea Garden Residency, Represented ...
Kerala
Mar-16-2016
Land Acquisition
Ashok Bhushan, C.J. 1. The Range Officer/Authorised Officer, Kerala Forest Department and the Tahsildar, Devikulam, who were respondents 1 and 2 in W.P(C) No.29534 of 2015 have come up in appeal against the judgment dated 26.10.2015...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.C. Pollard Vs. Satya Gopal Mazumdar
Kolkata
Aug-24-1943
Criminal
AIR1943Cal594
Derbyshire, C.J.1. On 25th May 1948 this Court issued a rule upon the District Magistrate of Murshidabad and upon the complainant to show cause why the conviction of the accused Pollard under Section 355, Penal Code...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBholanath Karmakar Vs. Sailendra Nath Pramanik
Kolkata
Sep-29-1983
Property
Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 2, 3 and 4
AIR1984Cal319,88CWN228
S.P. Roychowdhury and ;Amit Roy, Advs.
Anil K. Sen, J. 1. This is an appeal from an appellate decree. The subject matter of challenge is the judgment and decree dated June 19, 1978, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Midnapore in Title...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. O.K. Devaki and anr. Vs. Standard Chartered Bank and anr.
Karnataka
Jun-19-2008
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 21 and 21B; Central Excise Act - Sections 36; Customs Act - Sections 129; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 33A and 35; Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1979; Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1963; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 2(24); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 226(1A) and 227
ILR2008KAR3395; 2008(6)KarLJ33; ILR2008(3)Kar3395; 2008(6)KLJ33; 2008(3)KCCR1975; 2008(5)AIRKarR233; AIR2008NOC2523(DB)
S.P. Shankar, Sr. Counsel and; D. Vijaykumar, Adv.
ORDERDeepak Verma, J.1. Sri. S.P. Shankar, learned senior counsel with Sri. D. Vijayakumar appeared for the petitioners and Sri. Shohit H. Shetty, learned Counsel appeared for respondent No. 1 and Sri. H.S. Lingaraj, learned Counsel appeared...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »