Advanced Search Results

Kisanrao Manikrao Khopade and Another Vs. Municipal Council, Dhule and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyOther Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 175, 183, 200, 202, 207, 208, 183, 202, 322 and 328; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act - Sections 45(2); Constitution of India - Article 166

Reported in : AIR1992Bom249; 1991(4)BomCR9; (1992)94BOMLR808

Advocate for Appellant : C.J. Sawant with;P.P. Chavan, Advs.;N.B. Shah, Adv.;R.D. Soni, A.G.P.

ORDERS. W. Puranik, J.1. The petitioners are residents of Dhule and own property situate within the jurisdiction of Municipal Council, Dhule. The grievance of the petitioners is that the 1st petitioner had submitted his lay out...

Krishna Tatya Chavan and ors. Vs. Shankar Yamaji Kadam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32-G(6); Bombay Inferior Village Wants Abolition Act, 1958 - Sections 8; Bombay Inferior Village Wants Abolition (Amendment) Act, 1959

Reported in : AIR1983Bom52

Advocate for Appellant : N.B. Shah, Adv.

ORDER1. This petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India raises a pure question of law in regard to the interpretation and construction of the provision of S. 8 of the Bombay inferior village Watans...

Kumudini Ratilal Bhagat (Sou.) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1A), 29 and 145(1A)

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR634; 1987MhLJ462

Advocate for Appellant : Navin B. Shah, Adv.

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. Village Panchayat for Village Poyanad in Raigad District came to be established under section 9 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act ('the Act'). In due course on observing the procedural formalities the election...

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Vallabhbhai Dhanjibhai and Co.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

2. The assessee is a partnership firm and is engaged in the business of cutting and polishing of the rough diamonds and exporting the same. The rough diamonds are mostly purchased from outside India. During the...

Yogeshchandra Kanjibhai Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. The first grievance of the assessee in this appeal is that the learned CIT(A) is not justified in conforming the addition of Rs. 2,20,488 on account of loss by theft of ornaments.2. The assessee, an...

Yogeshchandra Kanjibhai Vs. Income Tax Officer.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)59TTJ(Ahd.)291

The first grievance of the assessee in this appeal is that the learned CIT(A) is not justified in conforming the addition of Rs. 2,20,488 on account of loss by theft of ornaments.2. The assessee, an individual,...

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Apollo Vikas Steels (P) Ltd. and ...

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)60TTJ(Ahd.)767

The common issue brought before us by the Revenue for adjudication is whether the activity of ship-breaking is an industrial undertaking, involving the activity of manufacture or production of articles or things so as to be...

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Apollo Vikas Steels (P) Ltd. and ...

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. The common issue brought before us by the Revenue for adjudication is whether the activity of ship-breaking is an industrial undertaking, involving the activity of manufacture or production of articles or things so as to...

Motilal Manrupji Solanki and ors. Vs. Ganeshmal Ramchandra Solanki

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationProperty

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR322

A.Y. Sakhare, J.1. Present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the order dated 25th April, 1991 passed by the Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Divn. Thane in Spl. Darkhast No....

R.P. Gupta and ors. Vs. B.M. Grower and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR844

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shah

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Short and neat question that falls for determination in this first appeal is whether by a provision made in the trust deed dated 6th April, 1973 that vacancy of the trustee shall be...